wangdequan/cnc_wams
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
bb71613051e8c23ac2889b8f71ab3a237687b4f5
cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md

58 KiB
Raw Blame History

2026-06-22 17:25:54 EDT - Codex execution log

User request:

  • Add a rule to agnents.md/agents rules requiring every GPT execution to write the full execution process into /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md.

Execution process:

  1. Searched the workspace for existing agent rule files with rg --files, including AGENTS.md, agents.md, and agnents.md patterns.
  2. Found existing rule file at /home/meswork/cnc_wams/wasm-port/AGENTS.md.
  3. Listed /home/meswork/cnc_wams and confirmed the workspace contains wasm-port/ and web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/.
  4. Read /home/meswork/cnc_wams/wasm-port/AGENTS.md and confirmed its scope is limited to the standalone LinuxCNC WASM simulation port under wasm-port/.
  5. Confirmed the target log directory exists: /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/.
  6. Updated /home/meswork/cnc_wams/wasm-port/AGENTS.md by adding a Working Style rule requiring the process log to be appended after every GPT/Codex execution.
  7. Reviewed the diff for /home/meswork/cnc_wams/wasm-port/AGENTS.md.
  8. Because the existing wasm-port/AGENTS.md only applies to wasm-port/, created a workspace-level /home/meswork/cnc_wams/AGENTS.md with the same logging rule so the requirement applies across the whole workspace.
  9. Appended this execution record to the requested log file.

Files changed:

  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/wasm-port/AGENTS.md
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/AGENTS.md
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md

2026-06-22 17:45:56 EDT - Codex execution log

User request:

  • Implement the detailed steps document for the working_run task, then execute according to that document.

Execution process:

  1. Read the workspace-level AGENTS.md and confirmed the required GPT/Codex process log target: /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md.
  2. Listed and read the existing working_run documentation, especially README.md, 05-run-program-implementation-detailed-steps.md, 06-run-implementation-traceability-matrix-and-next-steps.md, 07-browser-run-feedback-evidence-complete-next-steps.md, and 09-linear-units-meter-scene-complete-next-steps.md.
  3. Identified the remaining executable items after the prior RUN/browser/unit work: ABORT behavior, STEP feedback source, RUN gate assertions, INI-derived task/HAL cycle periods, and xyzbc-trt RUN status-loop symmetry.
  4. Inspected app/src/state/store.js, app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js, app/src/state/linuxcnc-task-policy.js, tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs, tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs, and tests/node/verify_linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime.mjs.
  5. Added web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/10-run-control-tests-and-ini-cycle-steps.md with detailed implementation and verification steps for the remaining working_run tasks.
  6. Updated app/src/state/store.js so task/HAL command execution and taskHalStatusLoop default cycle periods are derived from the loaded LinuxCNC INI: TASK.CYCLE_TIME -> taskPeriodNs and EMCMOT.SERVO_PERIOD -> servoPeriodNs, with the existing defaults retained only as fallback.
  7. Extended tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs to cover STOP, ABORT, STEP, INI-derived loop periods, fixture fallback exclusion, and xyzbc-trt RUN status-loop symmetry using boat-xyzbc.ngc.
  8. Extended tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs with fine-grained RUN gate assertions for machine off, not homed, manual mode, and no opened machine-file G-code.
  9. Ran node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs; result passed.
  10. Ran node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs; first run failed because the xyzbc short program completed before the status loop started. Switched the xyzbc symmetry case to the longer boat-xyzbc.ngc.
  11. Re-ran node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs; result passed.
  12. Ran the combined targeted validation: verify_run_preconditions.mjs, verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs, and verify_linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime.mjs; result passed.
  13. Ran npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build; result passed with gmoccapy_static_build=ok.
  14. Ran npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node; result passed.
  15. Updated working_run/README.md to include the new 10 document and adjusted the remaining next step to browser desktop/mobile meter-scale screenshot evidence.
  16. Appended the completion record to working_run/10-run-control-tests-and-ini-cycle-steps.md.
  17. Appended this execution record to the required GPT process log.

Files changed in this execution:

  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/10-run-control-tests-and-ini-cycle-steps.md
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/README.md
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md

Verification:

node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs: PASS
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs: PASS
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime.mjs: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node: PASS

Execution timestamp: 2026-06-22 17:55 EDT

User request:

  • Complete all remaining work according to the working_run execution status.

Execution process:

  1. Read the active workspace instructions and confirmed the required process log target: /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md.
  2. Read the current working_run status documents: README.md, 05-run-program-implementation-detailed-steps.md, 06-run-implementation-traceability-matrix-and-next-steps.md, 07-browser-run-feedback-evidence-complete-next-steps.md, 09-linear-units-meter-scene-complete-next-steps.md, and 10-run-control-tests-and-ini-cycle-steps.md.
  3. Determined that 10 had already completed ABORT/STEP/RUN-gate/INI-cycle and xyzbc symmetry coverage, leaving the 09 browser desktop/mobile meter-scale screenshot evidence and G20/G21 browser preview case as the remaining executable work.
  4. Inspected the browser evidence script qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs, the visualization code app/src/visualization/five-axis-scene.js, unit conversion helpers, interpreter unit parsing, and store program-loading flow.
  5. Updated app/src/visualization/five-axis-scene.js to expose data-three-path-bounds-meters via threePathBoundsMeters, computed from the rendered preview/executed/current-segment geometry in scene meters.
  6. Extended capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs with a meter-scene-evidence screenshot directory, meter-scale checks, mixed-unit checks, and a canvas screenshot helper for meter-scene evidence.
  7. Added browser case 08-meter-scene-desktop-mobile, which captures desktop and mobile canvas screenshots, records pixel stats and datasets, and asserts threeSceneUnits=m, nonzero threeLinearUnitScaleToMeters, threePathFitBounds=ok, meter-scale bounds, and nonblank canvas pixels.
  8. Added browser case 09-g20-g21-mixed-units-preview, which loads a local mixed-unit program using G20 then G21, verifies canonical motion contains both inch and mm, verifies the scene is still in meters, and verifies 1 inch maps to 0.0254m like 25.4 mm.
  9. Found that inserting the G20/G21 local program before the RUN case changed the active program context for 06-running-rtcp-toolpath. Fixed the evidence script by restoring the vendored impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc program before POWER/HOME/AUTO/RUN.
  10. Ran node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs; result passed with linear_unit_conversion_smoke=ok.
  11. Ran npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build; result passed with gmoccapy_static_build=ok.
  12. Ran node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs. The first run returned 0 but printed the RUN-context warning described in step 9. After the restore fix, re-ran the script and it exited 0 with no failed-case output.
  13. Read the generated JSON evidence and confirmed: meter-scene-evidence.json status=PASS, run-preconditions-feedback.json status=PASS, and all cases in toolpath-preview-cases.json were PASS, including the new 08 and 09 cases.
  14. Ran npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node; result passed, including kinematics, interpreter, INI, RUN preconditions, RUN feedback loop, task/HAL runtime, full execution boundary, machine-file staging, RTCP store, profile boundary, and linear unit conversion checks.
  15. Added web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/11-browser-meter-scene-and-mixed-units-complete.md with the completion matrix, output files, validation commands, and current conclusion.
  16. Updated working_run/README.md to include the new 11 document and mark the browser meter-scale and G20/G21 evidence as complete.
  17. Appended this execution record to the required GPT process log.

Files changed in this execution:

  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/visualization/five-axis-scene.js
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/toolpath-preview-cases.json
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/meter-scene-evidence.json
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/meter-scene-evidence/08-meter-scene-desktop.png
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/meter-scene-evidence/08-meter-scene-mobile.png
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/toolpath-preview-cases/09-g20-g21-mixed-units-preview.png
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/11-browser-meter-scene-and-mixed-units-complete.md
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/README.md
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md

Verification:

node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build: PASS
node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node: PASS

2026-06-22 working_run final completion follow-up

User request:

按“working_run”执行情况，完成剩余全部工作

Execution process:

  1. Read the workspace instruction requiring every GPT/Codex execution log to be appended to /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md.
  2. Inspected the current workspace from /home/meswork/cnc_wams.
  3. Listed web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run files and found documents 01 through 11, plus test assets and evidence files.
  4. Checked git status --short and observed an already-dirty tree containing prior implementation changes, generated screenshots/JSON, new tests, and working_run records. No unrelated files were reverted.
  5. Read 07-browser-run-feedback-evidence-complete-next-steps.md and confirmed the browser RUN feedback evidence case had been completed and the next listed work was ABORT/STEP/RUN-gate/INI-cycle/xyzbc coverage.
  6. Read 06-run-implementation-traceability-matrix-and-next-steps.md and confirmed its browser evidence and control-test items were historical open items later handled by subsequent documents.
  7. Read 08-linuxcnc-source-test-assets.md and confirmed the selected real LinuxCNC assets were xyzac-trt.ini and impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc, copied into working_run/test_linuxcnc_source.
  8. Read 09-linear-units-meter-scene-complete-next-steps.md and confirmed the remaining items were browser desktop/mobile meter-scale screenshots and a possible G20/G21 browser preview case.
  9. Read 10-run-control-tests-and-ini-cycle-steps.md and confirmed ABORT, STEP, granular RUN gates, INI-derived task/servo periods, and xyzbc RUN symmetry tests were completed and verified.
  10. Read 11-browser-meter-scene-and-mixed-units-complete.md and confirmed the browser desktop/mobile meter-scale evidence and G20/G21 mixed-units preview case were completed and verified.
  11. Read working_run/README.md and confirmed it indexed documents through 11, with the remaining boundary statement already noting browser meter and G20/G21 evidence completion.
  12. Inspected qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs and confirmed it contained meter-scene evidence and mixed-units cases.
  13. Listed node test files under web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node and confirmed the relevant tests were present, including verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs, verify_run_preconditions.mjs, and verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs.
  14. Read web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/package.json and confirmed the build and smoke:node scripts.
  15. Ran node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs; result passed: run_preconditions_ini_profile_smoke=ok, run_preconditions_kinematics_smoke=ok, run_preconditions_machine_file_smoke=ok.
  16. Ran node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs; result passed with run_feedback_status_loop_smoke=ok.
  17. Ran node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs; result passed with linear_unit_conversion_smoke=ok.
  18. Searched working_run for remaining words such as 未完成, 剩余, 后续, 下一步, TODO, pending. The hits were historical early-stage records or optional follow-ups; later documents 10 and 11 covered the actionable required items.
  19. Ran npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build; result passed with gmoccapy_static_build=ok.
  20. Ran npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node; result passed, including kinematics, interpreter, INI runtime, RUN preconditions, RUN feedback loop, task/HAL runtime, native task/HAL audit, full LinuxCNC source checks, real LinuxCNC 5-axis program cases, full execution boundary, machine-file staging, five-axis session, RTCP store, profile boundary, and linear unit conversion.
  21. Ran node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs; the browser evidence script returned exit code 0.
  22. Read qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/toolpath-preview-cases.json and confirmed all cases were PASS: 01-home-toolpath, 02-operator-demo-toolpath, 03-arc-demo-toolpath, 04-clear-preview-reference, 05-vendored-impeller-toolpath, 08-meter-scene-desktop-mobile, 09-g20-g21-mixed-units-preview, 06-running-rtcp-toolpath, and 07-run-preconditions-and-feedback.
  23. Read qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/run-preconditions-feedback.json and confirmed status=PASS.
  24. Read qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/meter-scene-evidence.json and confirmed status=PASS.
  25. Added web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/12-working-run-final-completion-record.md documenting that the required remaining working_run items are complete, mapping early historical open items to later completion documents, listing verification commands, and preserving only optional enhancements.
  26. Updated web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/README.md to include the new 12 document and state that the required working_run follow-up items have all been rechecked and passed.
  27. Appended this execution record to the required GPT process log.

Files changed in this follow-up execution:

  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/12-working-run-final-completion-record.md
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/README.md
  • /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md

Verification:

node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs: PASS
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs: PASS
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node: PASS
node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs: PASS
toolpath-preview-cases.json: all cases PASS
run-preconditions-feedback.json: PASS
meter-scene-evidence.json: PASS

2026-06-22 18:10:59 EDT working_run final recheck

User request:

按“working_run”执行情况，完成剩余全部工作

Execution process:

  1. Read the workspace AGENTS.md instruction requiring every GPT/Codex execution process log to be appended to web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md.
  2. Checked repository status with git status --short; confirmed the working tree already contained implementation, test, documentation, browser evidence, screenshot, and log changes from the ongoing working_run effort.
  3. Listed web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run and confirmed documents 01 through 12 exist, with 12-working-run-final-completion-record.md recording final completion.
  4. Read working_run/README.md, 10-run-control-tests-and-ini-cycle-steps.md, 11-browser-meter-scene-and-mixed-units-complete.md, and 12-working-run-final-completion-record.md.
  5. Determined that the actionable historical remaining items were already mapped to later completion records: 06 -> 07 for browser RUN feedback evidence, 07 -> 10 for ABORT/STEP/RUN gate/xyzbc symmetric tests, and 09/10 -> 11 for desktop/mobile meter-scene evidence and G20/G21 mixed-unit browser preview.
  6. Re-ran node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs; result passed with: run_preconditions_ini_profile_smoke=ok, run_preconditions_kinematics_smoke=ok, run_preconditions_machine_file_smoke=ok.
  7. Re-ran node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs; result passed with run_feedback_status_loop_smoke=ok.
  8. Re-ran node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs; result passed with linear_unit_conversion_smoke=ok.
  9. Re-ran npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build; result passed with gmoccapy_static_build=ok.
  10. Re-ran npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node; result passed, including kinematics, interpreter, INI runtime, RUN preconditions, RUN feedback loop, task/HAL runtime, native task/HAL audit, full LinuxCNC 5-axis source checks, real LinuxCNC 5-axis program cases, full execution boundary, machine-file staging, five-axis session, RTCP store, profile boundary, and linear unit conversion.
  11. Re-ran node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs; the browser evidence script returned exit code 0.
  12. Parsed browser evidence JSON outputs and confirmed: qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/toolpath-preview-cases.json has nine PASS cases, qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/run-preconditions-feedback.json has status=PASS, and qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/meter-scene-evidence.json has status=PASS.
  13. Confirmed no additional code edits were needed in this final recheck turn.
  14. Appended this execution process record to the required GPT process log.

Verification:

node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs: PASS
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs: PASS
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node: PASS
node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs: PASS
toolpath-preview-cases.json: nine cases PASS
run-preconditions-feedback.json: PASS
meter-scene-evidence.json: PASS

2026-06-22 18:22:46 EDT test_linuxcnc_source RUN browser report

User request:

使用“test_linuxcnc_source”中的文件，进行“run”测试。刀具路径预览、G代码执行每行过程显示、执行的刀具轨迹、实时轴值显示。截屏保存并编写测试全部过程，图文并茂写入word格式的测试文档中。

Execution process:

  1. Listed web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/test_linuxcnc_source and confirmed the test assets are xyzac-trt.ini and impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc.
  2. Inspected the existing QA browser capture and DOCX generation scripts under qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test, including capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs, generate-toolpath-preview-docx-report.mjs, and generate-docx-report.mjs.
  3. Inspected application entry/state/runtime code to confirm available browser automation APIs: window.webRtcp5AxisSimulation.stageMachineFiles, dispatch, getState, LinuxCNC source selection, RUN controls, G-code row active-line rendering, DRO rendering, and task/HAL runtime feedback state.
  4. Compared SHA-256 hashes for the test_linuxcnc_source files and the corresponding vendored LinuxCNC files: impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc hash e90f0b4b6c43809da94a8170ee1029b5afc3e1bbe9bf2ae66298a8baefad013c matched the vendored source, and xyzac-trt.ini hash 4b7fa6cb8d3e7031e769b3e0c779b586b67cfd45d715985f40d4ec23c662dc97 matched the vendored INI.
  5. Added a dedicated QA script: qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs.
  6. The script starts a local static server, launches headless Chrome, loads the app, stages machine files using the exact working_run/test_linuxcnc_source/xyzac-trt.ini text, selects the matching LinuxCNC impeller G-code source, verifies source hashes, prepares POWER/HOME/ AUTO/TCP, starts RUN, samples the live RUN state at 200ms, 500ms, 1000ms, 2000ms, and 5000ms, captures screenshots, stops the run, writes JSON evidence, and generates a DOCX report with embedded screenshots and tables.
  7. Ran node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs.
  8. The script completed with: test_linuxcnc_source_run_status=PASS.
  9. Reviewed qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json and confirmed all checks passed: test INI used, G-code hash match, toolpath preview visible, TCP/tool-axis visible, five RUN samples captured, active G-code line synced with UI, executed path visible, live axis values sourced from linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm, task/HAL cycles advanced, and STOP stopped the status loop.
  10. Confirmed screenshots were written under qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/test-linuxcnc-source-run: initial UI, staged test INI, toolpath preview, ready-before-run, five RUN samples, and stop-after-run.
  11. Confirmed the Word report was generated: qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-22.docx.
  12. Appended this execution process record to the required GPT process log.

Files created:

qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-22.docx
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/test-linuxcnc-source-run/*.png

Verification:

node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs: PASS
test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json status: PASS
RUN samples: 5
active line/UI line: 30/30, 55/55, 80/80, 105/105, 125/125
feedback source: linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm
toolpath preview points: 1498
Word report: qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-22.docx

2026-06-22 18:33:50 EDT feed-rate execution verification

User request:

G代码应该按真实的进给速度执行。请核实验证

Execution process:

  1. Inspected web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/execution-timing.js. It estimates segment durations from canonical motion distance, feed rate, profile velocity limits, and feed/rapid overrides, but its semanticBoundary is explicitly linuxcnc_canonical_motion_timing_estimate_not_planner_queue.
  2. Searched app/runtime/sdk code for feed, velocity, active line, task cycle, servo cycle, and elapsed-time handling.
  3. Reviewed qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json. The five RUN samples reported constant velocity 3600, active lines 30,55,80,105,125, task cycles 33,58,83,108,128, and servo cycles 330,580,830,1080,1280.
  4. Inspected wasm-port/runtime/sdk/src/linuxcnc-task-hal.js; runCycles forwards only cycle periods and task cycle count into lctask_run_cycles.
  5. Inspected wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp.
  6. Found enqueue_linear_move_from_line(...) appends "velocity":60 to every motion command, independent of the G-code line's F word or modal feed mode.
  7. Found lctask_run_cycles(...) enqueues one parsed program line per task cycle while interp_state == "READING", so active-line progression is cycle-count based, not elapsed-distance/feed based.
  8. Confirmed the current browser RUN evidence validates task/HAL feedback, line highlighting, execution trace, and DRO synchronization, but it does not validate real feed-rate paced execution.
  9. Appended this verification record to the required GPT process log.

Conclusion:

Current RUN is not yet verified as real feed-rate execution.
Current task/HAL WASM simulation uses fixed velocity=60 units/s
and advances program lines by task cycle, not by G-code F/feed timing.
The existing execution-timing module can estimate feed-based segment timing,
but it is not the authoritative pacing source for task/HAL RUN.

2026-06-22 18:40:24 EDT feed-rate RUN fix programming document

User request:

创建新目录，编写解决“ F 用作真实运行速”的编程文档
“当前 G-code interpreter 确实能解析 F，execution-timing.js 也能做 feed-based timing estimate；但 task/HAL RUN 执行链路没有把 G-code 的 F 用作真实运行速度，而是在 C++ wrapper 层固定用了 velocity=60。“

Execution process:

  1. Reviewed existing project directories and working_run structure to choose a new focused documentation location.
  2. Re-read source evidence in wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp, including the fixed velocity=60 in enqueue_linear_move_from_line(...) and one-line-per-task-cycle behavior in lctask_run_cycles(...).
  3. Re-read web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/execution-timing.js and web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-interpreter-runtime.js to document the existing F/feedRate parsing and timing-estimate capabilities.
  4. Created new directory: web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/feed-rate-run-fix.
  5. Added web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/feed-rate-run-fix/README.md.
  6. The document covers the current problem, source evidence, required behavior, recommended architecture, G94/G93 feed semantics, implementation targets, task/HAL motion-plan API proposal, C++ runtime state changes, elapsed-time RUN loop design, test plan, browser evidence updates, acceptance criteria, risks, and suggested implementation order.
  7. Checked the created document length with wc -l; it contains 726 lines.
  8. Appended this execution process record to the required GPT process log.

Files created:

web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/feed-rate-run-fix/README.md

2026-06-22 18:54:04 EDT feed-rate RUN implementation

User request:

按“web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/feed-rate-run-fix“工作，修复feed

Execution process:

  1. Read workspace AGENTS instructions and the feed-rate run-fix README.
  2. Inspected the existing task/HAL C++ wrapper, SDK boundary, app runtime wrappers, store RUN path, interpreter runtime, execution timing, and existing node/WASM tests.
  3. Preserved unrelated dirty worktree changes and limited direct edits to the feed RUN path and focused tests.
  4. Added interpreter feed-mode tracking for G93/G94; motion events now carry feedMode.
  5. Updated execution timing to emit startAxes, endAxes, feedMode, and per-event linear unit aware distances; added first-stage G93 inverse-time timing as durationSeconds = 60 / F.
  6. Added a task/HAL motion-plan API through: lctask_load_program_motion_plan_json, createLinuxCncTaskHalSdk().loadProgramMotionPlan(...), app direct runtime wrapper, and worker runtime wrapper.
  7. Reworked task/HAL RUN execution so a loaded motion plan advances by elapsed task time, interpolates axis pose inside the active segment, forwards the interpolated pose to motion/HAL, and sets velocity from velocityMmPerMin / 60 instead of fixed velocity=60.
  8. Kept the old text parser path only as fallback/MDI support and changed its simple F handling so it no longer blindly emits fixed velocity for parsed lines.
  9. Updated store RUN flow to build/load the task/HAL feed motion plan before EMC_TASK_PLAN_RUN, block RUN if the feed motion plan cannot be loaded, and mark applied task/HAL feedback as linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm.
  10. Added SDK-level regression coverage proving a slow long segment remains in-progress after elapsed time and reports currentVel from F-derived timing rather than fixed 60 units/s.
  11. Updated run feedback loop coverage to attach the interpreter runtime so task/HAL RUN uses the generated feed motion plan, and asserted feedback is task/HAL sourced with non-fixed velocity.
  12. Added unit/timing coverage for mixed G20/G21 linear units and G93 inverse-time feed mode.
  13. Rebuilt task/HAL WASM with the new export.
  14. Verified syntax and whitespace with node --check and git diff --check.
  15. Ran validation commands: ./wasm-port/tools/build_task_hal_wasm.sh, node wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_wasm.mjs, node wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs, node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs, node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs, node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linuxcnc_interpreter_runtime.mjs, node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs, and npm run build in web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app.

Files modified for this request:

wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp
wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.hh
wasm-port/runtime/sdk/src/linuxcnc-task-hal.js
wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs
wasm-port/tools/build_task_hal_wasm.sh
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/execution-timing.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-interpreter-runtime.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-worker-client.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-worker.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs

2026-06-22 19:01:07 EDT actual G-code feed RUN validation

User request:

使用实际程序进行验证G代码程序，按程序要求的feed执行

Execution process:

  1. Reviewed the real test program under web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/test_linuxcnc_source/impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc and confirmed it uses G93 inverse-time feed with real F318, F159, and F636 feed words.
  2. Read existing browser QA script qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs.
  3. Adjusted store timing selection so G93 programs use the feed-mode aware execution timing path instead of the optional TP planner timing samples.
  4. Added Node validation web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs.
  5. The Node validation loads the actual impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc, runs the LinuxCNC interpreter, builds feed-aware timing, loads the task/HAL motion plan, runs task/HAL cycles, and checks that task/HAL feedback velocities come from program feed timing rather than fixed 3600 mm/min.
  6. Verified actual program timing values: F159 inverse-time duration is 0.37735849056603776s, and F636 inverse-time duration is 0.09433962264150944s.
  7. Verified task/HAL feedback exposed multiple distinct velocities for the real program, including 2100, 635.748, 283.918, 59.123, 58.196, and no fixed 3600.
  8. Updated the browser QA capture to record feed evidence per sample: actual velocity, expected timing velocity, feed rate, feed mode, and segment duration.
  9. Extended the browser RUN sample points to include 17000ms, then ran: node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs.
  10. Browser validation completed with test_linuxcnc_source_run_status=PASS.
  11. Browser report files generated: /home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json and /home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-22.docx.
  12. Browser report checks passed for source hash, toolpath preview, task/HAL feedback source, non-fixed feed velocity, changing feed velocity, G93 inverse-time feed use, task/HAL cycle advance, and STOP loop shutdown.

Validation commands:

node --check qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs
node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs

Files modified or created for this validation:

web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-22.docx
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/test-linuxcnc-source-run/

2026-06-23 HTTPS deployment on 8092

User request:

网站部署成https
IP 82.156.24.101
SSH user ubuntu
Port 8092

Execution process:

  1. Read workspace instructions from /home/meswork/cnc_wams/AGENTS.md.
  2. Identified the web app under /home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app.
  3. Checked the app scripts in app/package.json; the static build command is npm run build, which runs node scripts/build-static.mjs.
  4. Ran npm run build in web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app. Result: gmoccapy_static_build=ok.
  5. Verified SSH connectivity to ubuntu@82.156.24.101 using a temporary askpass helper.
  6. Uploaded the freshly built app/dist contents as a tarball to the remote host.
  7. Extracted the tarball into /var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim and set ownership to www-data:www-data.
  8. Confirmed TLS certificate files exist on the remote host: /etc/letsencrypt/live/82.156.24.101/fullchain.pem and /etc/letsencrypt/live/82.156.24.101/privkey.pem.
  9. Updated /etc/nginx/sites-available/web-rtcp-5axis-sim to serve /var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim on listen 8092 ssl http2 and listen [::]:8092 ssl http2.
  10. Created a backup of the previous nginx site config: /etc/nginx/sites-available/web-rtcp-5axis-sim.https.bak.20260623083119.
  11. Ran sudo nginx -t. Result: configuration syntax was OK and test was successful.
  12. Restarted nginx with sudo systemctl restart nginx.
  13. Verified the remote local endpoint: curl -k https://127.0.0.1:8092/. Result: HTTP 200; response began with the app HTML document.
  14. Verified the public HTTPS endpoint from the local workspace: curl -k https://82.156.24.101:8092/. Result: HTTP 200, content type text/html, download size 410.
  15. Confirmed nginx is listening on 0.0.0.0:8092 and [::]:8092.
  16. Checked git status --short; it showed pre-existing dirty worktree changes unrelated to the deployment plus this log directory/file.

Validation commands:

npm run build
sudo nginx -t
sudo systemctl restart nginx
curl -k https://127.0.0.1:8092/
curl -k https://82.156.24.101:8092/

Deployment result:

https://82.156.24.101:8092/
public_https_status=200
content_type=text/html

2026-06-23 Public HTTPS Chrome RUN test

User request:

你测试一下“https://82.156.24.101:8092/”，使用本机的chrom.
“run”根本不好用

Execution process:

  1. Verified local browser availability: /usr/bin/google-chrome and /usr/bin/google-chrome-stable exist.
  2. Verified the public HTTPS endpoint with curl: https://82.156.24.101:8092/ returned HTTP 200, content type text/html.
  3. Read the existing QA browser automation scripts under qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/, especially run-site-test.mjs.
  4. Ran node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/run-site-test.mjs, which uses /usr/bin/google-chrome and targets https://82.156.24.101:8092/.
  5. Read the generated report qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/site-test-report.json. That broad test reported Run 程序 as PASS, but also showed Step 单步执行 as FAIL.
  6. Because the broad test could hide the user's reported RUN problem, ran a focused Puppeteer test with local Google Chrome against the same public HTTPS URL.
  7. The focused test captured screenshots under: qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/public-https-run-debug/.
  8. The focused test wrote: qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/public-https-run-debug.json.
  9. The focused test reproduced the RUN problem: runStarted=false, final runState=idle, active line stayed 1, all sampled velocities stayed 0, and executed path points stayed 1.
  10. The pre-RUN state showed powerOn=false, taskState=estop-reset, allHomed=false, mode auto, and UI status power off / clear / auto.
  11. The HOME wait timed out, so the machine never reached the expected powered and homed state.
  12. Despite those failed prerequisites, the RUN button snapshot showed disabled=false, so the UI exposes a clickable RUN button even when execution cannot actually start.
  13. There were no browser console errors, page errors, or failed requests in the focused test, so this is an application state/control-flow issue rather than an HTTPS/network loading failure.

Key evidence:

public_https_run_debug_json=/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/public-https-run-debug.json
runStarted=false
finalRunState=idle
activeLines=[1]
movingVelocityCount=0
velocities=[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
executedPoints=[1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
consoleErrorCount=0
pageErrorCount=0
requestFailureCount=0
beforeRun.status="power off / clear / auto"
beforeRun.machine.powerOn=false
beforeRun.machine.allHomed=false
beforeRun.runButton.disabled=false

Conclusion:

Confirmed: public HTTPS page loads, but RUN is not functionally usable in the
focused local-Chrome test because the machine never reaches powered/homed ready
state and the RUN button remains clickable without starting execution.

2026-06-23 RUN repair using LinuxCNC source behavior

User request:

你先参考“/home/meswork/cnc_wams/linuxcnc”的源程序处理“run”的方式，再修复这个仿真项目的“run”

Execution process:

  1. Referenced LinuxCNC source under /home/meswork/cnc_wams/linuxcnc.
  2. Read linuxcnc/src/emc/task/emctaskmain.cc and confirmed the real RUN path: machine state must be ON, task mode AUTO, interpreter state IDLE, and the machine must be homed before EMC_TASK_PLAN_RUN is accepted.
  3. Confirmed in LinuxCNC source that EMC_TASK_PLAN_RUN rejects execution when all_homed() is false and no_force_homing is not enabled.
  4. Read the Python UI command binding in linuxcnc/src/emc/usr_intf/axis/extensions/emcmodule.cc, confirming home sends EMC_JOINT_HOME and auto run sends EMC_TASK_PLAN_RUN.
  5. Fixed the web simulation state flow in web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js:
    • Loading a LinuxCNC G-code source no longer forces task mode to auto.
    • The user can power on, stay in manual mode, home, then switch to auto/run.
    • Task/HAL session initialization preserves and replays existing power/home/mode state instead of resetting the UI path to ESTOP_RESET.
    • TOGGLE_POWER updates UI state immediately before the async Task/HAL command completes.
    • HOME sends EMC_JOINT_HOME to Task/HAL and marks the machine homed in the UI state.
  6. Fixed the Task/HAL WASM shim in wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp:
    • Added EMC_JOINT_HOME handling.
    • Kept the existing feed-timed motion plan support used by the RUN feedback loop.
  7. Updated bottom controls in web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js to use gateLinuxCncTaskAction, so controls like RUN/HOME/STEP reflect LinuxCNC task policy and disabled controls show the block reason.
  8. Updated web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime.mjs so test setup no longer toggles power off after session initialization.
  9. Rebuilt Task/HAL WASM: bash wasm-port/tools/build_task_hal_wasm.sh. Result: linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm_build=ok.
  10. Ran syntax checks for changed JS files.
  11. Ran app build: npm run build. Result: gmoccapy_static_build=ok.
  12. Ran focused node regression tests:
    • node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime.mjs
    • node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
    • node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs Results passed, including linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime_smoke=ok and run_feedback_status_loop_smoke=ok.
  13. Redeployed the rebuilt static site to /var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim on 82.156.24.101.
  14. Verified remote nginx config with nginx -t and restarted nginx.
  15. Verified remote local HTTPS endpoint returned HTTP 200.
  16. Ran local Google Chrome/Puppeteer focused RUN test against https://82.156.24.101:8092/.
  17. The public HTTPS Chrome test generated: qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/public-https-run-debug.json and screenshots under qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/public-https-run-debug/.
  18. Public Chrome RUN test passed the previously failing behavior: runStarted=true, finalRunState=complete, active lines advanced from 1 to 10, velocity samples were nonzero, and feedback source was linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm.

Validation commands:

bash wasm-port/tools/build_task_hal_wasm.sh
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js
npm run build
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime.mjs
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs
curl -k https://127.0.0.1:8092/
local Google Chrome Puppeteer RUN test against https://82.156.24.101:8092/

Public Chrome evidence:

public_https_run_debug_json=/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/public-https-run-debug.json
runStarted=true
finalRunState=complete
activeLines=[1,10]
distinctActiveLineCount=2
distinctPoseCount=5
movingVelocityCount=9
velocities=[3600,2100,2100,2100,2100,2100,2100,2100,2100]
feedbackSources=["linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm"]
consoleErrorCount=0
pageErrorCount=0
requestFailureCount=0

Files changed:

web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime.mjs
wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp
wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.hh
wasm-port/runtime/sdk/src/linuxcnc-task-hal.js

2026-06-22 19:24:00 EDT toolpath preview correctness check

User request:

和对刀具预览路径是否正确？

Execution process:

  1. Inspected current browser validation report qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json.
  2. Checked the preview step 03-toolpath-preview from the report.
  3. Confirmed the loaded program is the real LinuxCNC source program configs/sim/axis/vismach/5axis/table-rotary-tilting/demos/impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc.
  4. Confirmed programExecutionSourceMode is linuxcnc-interpreter-wasm.
  5. Confirmed the canvas dataset reports threeToolpathPreviewSource=linuxcnc_interpreter_canonical_motion.
  6. Confirmed threeNoGcodeSemanticsGeneration=ok, meaning the preview layer is not generating separate G-code semantics.
  7. Read web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/visualization/five-axis-scene.js and verified buildProgramPreviewPoints(...) maps state.programExecution.motion canonical motion axes into scene meters.
  8. Verified the report shows motionEventCount=4492 and threePathPoints=1498; source inspection showed this is due to limitPoints(...) sampling with MAX_TOOLPATH_POINTS, not because the preview path uses fixture data.
  9. Confirmed preview visual evidence: threePathFitBounds=ok, threeRapidFeedVisualDistinction=ok, threeTcpMarker=sphere, threeToolAxisMarker=line, and screenshot /home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/test-linuxcnc-source-run/03-toolpath-preview.png.
  10. Appended this execution-process record to the required GPT process log.

2026-06-22 19:27:26 EDT full canonical toolpath points validation

User request:

“报告里 motionEventCount=4492，但 threePathPoints=1498“比抽样，使用实际数据

Execution process:

  1. Re-read web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/visualization/five-axis-scene.js and located the preview point limiting path: MAX_TOOLPATH_POINTS = 1600 and limitPoints(...).
  2. Confirmed the previous browser report had motionEventCount=4492 and threePathPoints=1498.
  3. Changed MAX_TOOLPATH_POINTS to Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY so preview geometry uses the full LinuxCNC canonical motion point list instead of sampled points.
  4. Updated qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs to add a report check named 刀具路径使用完整 canonical motion 点, asserting threePathPoints === motionEventCount.
  5. Ran syntax checks for the visualization and QA script.
  6. Ran npm run build in web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app; build passed.
  7. Re-ran actual browser validation: node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs.
  8. Browser validation completed with test_linuxcnc_source_run_status=PASS.
  9. Verified the refreshed report now shows: motionEventCount=4492, threePathPoints=4492, threeFeedPathPoints=4306, and threeRapidPathPoints=186.
  10. Verified the new full-point check passed with detail: threePathPoints=4492, motionEventCount=4492.
  11. Appended this execution-process record to the required GPT process log.

Validation commands:

node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/visualization/five-axis-scene.js
node --check qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs
npm run build
node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs

Files modified or regenerated:

web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/visualization/five-axis-scene.js
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-22.docx
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/test-linuxcnc-source-run/

2026-06-22 Run activeLine line-by-line fix

User request: run还是不能一行一行执行。修复程序.

Process summary:

  1. Inspected workspace rules in AGENTS.md and wasm-port/AGENTS.md; noted required process log append.
  2. Reviewed existing dirty worktree and avoided reverting unrelated existing changes.
  3. Traced Run state flow through:
    • web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
    • web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js
    • wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp
  4. Reproduced the root cause with the boat LinuxCNC source program: ordinary interpreter output had only sparse canonical motion lines 9,10, which made task/HAL Run appear to jump to the end instead of stepping through source G-code lines.
  5. Added task/HAL motion-plan support for source-line fallback segments in linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js; when canonical motion is too sparse but source G-code has executable rows, the task/HAL plan now includes per-source-line timed segments.
  6. Passed programLines from store motion-plan loading into buildTaskHalProgramMotionPlan.
  7. Updated linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp so the task/HAL runtime tracks both compact executable line count and original source line count, and no longer clamps planned source-line numbers down to the compact non-comment line count.
  8. Rebuilt task/HAL WASM with bash wasm-port/tools/build_task_hal_wasm.sh.
  9. Strengthened verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs so it waits for and asserts multiple distinct monotonic active lines, preventing a regression back to activeLines=[1,10].
  10. Verified boat fallback plan generation locally: original motion lines were 9,10, but generated task/HAL plan had 1857 source-line segments and first lines 2,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20.
  11. Ran Node/WASM regression tests successfully:
    • node wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs
    • node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs
    • node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
  12. Ran local Chrome/Puppeteer evidence against the local static app for boat-xyzac.ngc; evidence written to qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/local-chrome-boat-run-line-evidence.json.
  13. Local Chrome evidence showed local_chrome_boat_activeLines=9,10,12 and local_chrome_boat_historyLines=9,10,11,12, confirming the browser no longer shows only [1,10].
  14. Did not deploy to public https://82.156.24.101:8092/; user requested local validation first.

Validation commands:

bash wasm-port/tools/build_task_hal_wasm.sh
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
git diff --check -- web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
node wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs

Files modified or generated by this execution:

wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/local-chrome-boat-run-line-evidence.json
wasm-port/build/wasm/task-hal/linuxcnc_task_hal.js
wasm-port/build/wasm/task-hal/linuxcnc_task_hal.wasm

2026-06-22 LinuxCNC source-line task/HAL/HAL-pin run fix

User request: reference /home/meswork/cnc_wams/linuxcnc source program and fix the previous interpretation that openedLineCount was a compressed non-comment executable count. The requested behavior is that task and HAL cooperate, push line status to the frontend in real time, and line numbers fully account for comments and blank lines.

Process summary:

  1. Inspected LinuxCNC upstream source under /home/meswork/cnc_wams/linuxcnc.
  2. Confirmed LinuxCNC interpreter semantics:
    • rs274ngc_pre.cc documents that _setup.sequence_number is incremented by reads.
    • interp_convert.cc passes block->line_number into canonical motion calls such as STRAIGHT_TRAVERSE and STRAIGHT_FEED.
    • This means motion line numbers are source-file line numbers, not compressed executable-row indexes; comments and blank lines affect later source line numbers.
  3. Updated task/HAL WASM runtime state in wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp:
    • openedLineCount now reports source-file line count.
    • openedSourceLineCount also reports source-file line count.
    • Added executableLineCount for the internal compact fallback list.
    • Non-motion-plan fallback still uses executableLineCount, while motion-plan execution and completion use source-line numbers.
  4. Updated frontend task/HAL normalization in web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js:
    • exposes motionProgramLine, halProgramLine, activeLineSource, and activeLineHalSynced.
    • active line prefers task/motion status and falls back to HAL pin only if needed.
  5. Updated store feedback in web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js:
    • completion uses openedSourceLineCount || openedLineCount.
    • runtime feedback records motion/HAL pin line values and sync status so frontend evidence proves line updates are task/HAL/HAL-pin driven.
  6. Added/updated WASM SDK regression in wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs:
    • staged a program with a leading comment, blank line, comment-only line, and source moves on lines 3 and 5.
    • asserted openedLineCount=6, openedSourceLineCount=6, executableLineCount=3.
    • asserted motion status and HAL pin both report source lines 3 and 5.
  7. Strengthened web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs:
    • feedback history must come from linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm.
    • active line source must be motion-status.
    • line, motion program line, and HAL program-line pin must all match.
  8. Rebuilt task/HAL WASM.
  9. Ran Node/WASM verification successfully.
  10. Ran local Chrome/Puppeteer verification against the local static app using boat-xyzac.ngc.
  11. Browser evidence written to qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/local-chrome-boat-run-line-evidence.json.
  12. Browser evidence showed:
    • local_chrome_boat_activeLines=9,10,12
    • local_chrome_boat_historyLines=9,10,11,12
    • local_chrome_boat_task_hal_synced=true
  13. Did not deploy to public URL in this run.

Validation commands:

bash wasm-port/tools/build_task_hal_wasm.sh
node --check wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
node wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs
git diff --check -- wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/local-chrome-boat-run-line-evidence.json

Files modified or generated by this execution:

wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp
wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/local-chrome-boat-run-line-evidence.json
wasm-port/build/wasm/task-hal/linuxcnc_task_hal.js
wasm-port/build/wasm/task-hal/linuxcnc_task_hal.wasm

2026-06-22 Cloud repository sync

User request: sync the current workspace state to the cloud repository at http://154.8.160.151:3000/wangdequan/cnc_wams using the provided credentials.

Process summary:

  1. Confirmed repository root with git rev-parse --show-toplevel:
    • /home/meswork/cnc_wams
  2. Confirmed current branch with git branch --show-current:
    • master
  3. Confirmed remote configuration with git remote -v:
    • origin http://154.8.160.151:3000/wangdequan/cnc_wams (fetch)
    • origin http://154.8.160.151:3000/wangdequan/cnc_wams (push)
  4. Confirmed git user identity with git config user.name && git config user.email:
    • wangdequan
    • wangdequan@meswork.com
  5. Confirmed there were local modified and untracked files with git status --short.
  6. Staged and committed all current workspace changes:
    • command: git add -A && git commit -m "feat: sync latest run execution updates"
    • result: created commit 8d3177cb73abc588d04496b7c0890c00194a0d2b
  7. Pushed master to the cloud repository using authenticated HTTP push with masked credentials:
    • command: git push "http://wangdequan:******@154.8.160.151:3000/wangdequan/cnc_wams" master
    • result: push succeeded
    • remote update: 0b1aad3..8d3177c master -> master
  8. Verified post-push state:
    • git rev-parse HEAD returned 8d3177cb73abc588d04496b7c0890c00194a0d2b
    • git status --short returned clean output
  9. Recorded this execution log in web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md per workspace instruction.

Execution timestamp:

  • 2026-06-22 21:47:33 EDT

Validation commands:

git rev-parse --show-toplevel
git branch --show-current
git remote -v
git status --short
git config user.name && git config user.email
git add -A && git commit -m "feat: sync latest run execution updates"
git push "http://wangdequan:******@154.8.160.151:3000/wangdequan/cnc_wams" master
git rev-parse HEAD
date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z'
git status --short

Files modified or generated by this execution:

web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink