wangdequan/cnc_wams
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
37604fa5b36e0894491f96782a271b40b46cc4b2
cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md

1915 lines
90 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
## 2026-06-22 17:25:54 EDT - Codex execution log
User request:
- Add a rule to `agnents.md`/agents rules requiring every GPT execution to write
the full execution process into
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md`.
Execution process:
1. Searched the workspace for existing agent rule files with `rg --files`,
including `AGENTS.md`, `agents.md`, and `agnents.md` patterns.
2. Found existing rule file at
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/wasm-port/AGENTS.md`.
3. Listed `/home/meswork/cnc_wams` and confirmed the workspace contains
`wasm-port/` and `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/`.
4. Read `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/wasm-port/AGENTS.md` and confirmed its scope is
limited to the standalone LinuxCNC WASM simulation port under `wasm-port/`.
5. Confirmed the target log directory exists:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/`.
6. Updated `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/wasm-port/AGENTS.md` by adding a Working
Style rule requiring the process log to be appended after every GPT/Codex
execution.
7. Reviewed the diff for `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/wasm-port/AGENTS.md`.
8. Because the existing `wasm-port/AGENTS.md` only applies to `wasm-port/`,
created a workspace-level `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/AGENTS.md` with the same
logging rule so the requirement applies across the whole workspace.
9. Appended this execution record to the requested log file.
Files changed:
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/wasm-port/AGENTS.md`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/AGENTS.md`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md`
## 2026-06-22 17:45:56 EDT - Codex execution log
User request:
- Implement the detailed steps document for the `working_run` task, then execute
according to that document.
Execution process:
1. Read the workspace-level `AGENTS.md` and confirmed the required GPT/Codex
process log target:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md`.
2. Listed and read the existing `working_run` documentation, especially
`README.md`, `05-run-program-implementation-detailed-steps.md`,
`06-run-implementation-traceability-matrix-and-next-steps.md`,
`07-browser-run-feedback-evidence-complete-next-steps.md`, and
`09-linear-units-meter-scene-complete-next-steps.md`.
3. Identified the remaining executable items after the prior RUN/browser/unit
work: ABORT behavior, STEP feedback source, RUN gate assertions, INI-derived
task/HAL cycle periods, and xyzbc-trt RUN status-loop symmetry.
4. Inspected `app/src/state/store.js`,
`app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js`,
`app/src/state/linuxcnc-task-policy.js`,
`tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`,
`tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs`, and
`tests/node/verify_linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime.mjs`.
5. Added
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/10-run-control-tests-and-ini-cycle-steps.md`
with detailed implementation and verification steps for the remaining
`working_run` tasks.
6. Updated `app/src/state/store.js` so task/HAL command execution and
`taskHalStatusLoop` default cycle periods are derived from the loaded
LinuxCNC INI:
`TASK.CYCLE_TIME -> taskPeriodNs` and
`EMCMOT.SERVO_PERIOD -> servoPeriodNs`, with the existing defaults retained
only as fallback.
7. Extended `tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs` to cover STOP, ABORT,
STEP, INI-derived loop periods, fixture fallback exclusion, and xyzbc-trt
RUN status-loop symmetry using `boat-xyzbc.ngc`.
8. Extended `tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs` with fine-grained RUN gate
assertions for machine off, not homed, manual mode, and no opened machine-file
G-code.
9. Ran `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs`;
result passed.
10. Ran `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`;
first run failed because the xyzbc short program completed before the status
loop started. Switched the xyzbc symmetry case to the longer
`boat-xyzbc.ngc`.
11. Re-ran `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`;
result passed.
12. Ran the combined targeted validation:
`verify_run_preconditions.mjs`,
`verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`, and
`verify_linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime.mjs`; result passed.
13. Ran `npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build`; result passed with
`gmoccapy_static_build=ok`.
14. Ran `npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node`; result passed.
15. Updated `working_run/README.md` to include the new `10` document and adjusted
the remaining next step to browser desktop/mobile meter-scale screenshot
evidence.
16. Appended the completion record to
`working_run/10-run-control-tests-and-ini-cycle-steps.md`.
17. Appended this execution record to the required GPT process log.
Files changed in this execution:
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/10-run-control-tests-and-ini-cycle-steps.md`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/README.md`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md`
Verification:
```text
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs: PASS
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs: PASS
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime.mjs: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node: PASS
```
## 2026-06-23 03:52 EDT - 云端 8092 RUN 修复、部署和复测
User request:
- 测试并完善 `https://82.156.24.101:8092/` 的 `run` 功能。
- 使用 `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/test_linuxcnc_source` 下面的 INI/G-code 测试。
- 要求 RUN 按实际行执行、按实际 feed 执行、各轴数据正确，并在程序列表显示每行执行过程。
- 约束：只应在 `ON + AUTO + IDLE + homed` 下进入 `EMC_TASK_PLAN_RUN`，且 session 初始化不能把已 POWER/HOME 的 UI 状态重置回 off/unhomed。
Process:
1. Read workspace instructions and existing repository context:
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/AGENTS.md`
- `qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs`
- `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js`
- `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js`
- `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-machine-file-staging.js`
- `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js`
- `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`
- `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs`
2. Reviewed existing local dirty worktree and existing evidence files. Existing local report already showed local PASS, but cloud target still needed verification.
3. Ran cloud Puppeteer probe against `https://82.156.24.101:8092/`.
- Initial cloud probe output:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/cloud-run-debug-current/cloud-run-debug-current.json`
- Finding: cloud page had `Run Ready`, but after clicking it the test timed out waiting for `taskState=on/allHomed/auto/tcp`.
4. Ran a shorter cloud `Run Ready` probe:
- Output:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/cloud-run-ready-after.json`
- Finding before deploy:
- Before: `taskState=estop-reset`, `mode=manual`, `allHomed=false`.
- After `Run Ready`: `taskState=on`, `mode=auto`, `rtcpState=on`, but `allHomed=false`.
- Result: subsequent `Run` was still blocked by the homing gate.
5. Added focused regression coverage in:
- `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`
- New `verifyRunReadySequence` path validates:
- `RUN_READY` sets `powerOn=true`, `taskState=on`, `mode=auto`, `allHomed=true`, `rtcpState=on`.
- A following `RUN` enters `linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm` feedback.
- `operatorMessage` is not `run blocked: home machine first`.
6. Updated `verify_run_preconditions.mjs` to match the current explicit gate order:
- ON + manual + unhomed: `run blocked: switch to auto mode first`.
- ON + auto + unhomed: `run blocked: home machine first`.
7. Verified local node tests:
- `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`
- `run_feedback_status_loop_smoke=ok`
- `run_ready_sequence_smoke=ok`
- `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs`
- `run_preconditions_ini_profile_smoke=ok`
- `run_preconditions_kinematics_smoke=ok`
- `run_preconditions_machine_file_smoke=ok`
8. Ran full local browser evidence capture:
- Command:
`node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs`
- Result:
`test_linuxcnc_source_run_status=PASS`
- JSON:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json`
- DOCX:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-23.docx`
- Key PASS evidence:
- `test_linuxcnc_source INI used`
- `test_linuxcnc_source G-code hash matches loaded source`
- `刀具路径使用完整 canonical motion 点`
- `RUN 采样数量`
- `每行执行高亮同步`
- `程序列表显示每行执行过程`
- `执行轨迹可见`
- `实时轴值来自 task/HAL feedback`
- `RUN feed 不是固定 3600 mm/min`
- `RUN feed 随实际 G-code F/G93 段变化`
- `RUN 使用 G93 inverse-time feed`
- `task/HAL cycle 推进`
- `STOP 后 loop 停止`
9. Built static site:
- Command:
`npm run build` from `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app`
- Result:
`gmoccapy_static_build=ok`
- Build output:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/dist`
10. Created deployment tarball:
- `/tmp/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-8092-runfix-20260623.tar.gz`
11. Connected to cloud host:
- SSH target: `ubuntu@82.156.24.101`
- Confirmed nginx was listening on port `8092`.
- Confirmed nginx site root:
`/var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim`
- Noted older home copy:
`/home/ubuntu/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-8092`
12. Uploaded release tarball to:
- `/home/ubuntu/tmp/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-8092-runfix-20260623.tar.gz`
13. Deployed to nginx site:
- Backup:
`/home/ubuntu/tmp/web-rtcp-backups/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-before-runfix-20260623-154606`
- Release extraction:
`/home/ubuntu/tmp/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-8092-runfix-20260623-154606`
- Synced release into:
`/var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim`
- Ran:
`sudo nginx -t`
- Result:
`nginx: configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf test is successful`
- Reloaded nginx.
14. Ran cloud post-deploy RUN probe:
- Output:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/cloud-run-after-deploy/cloud-run-after-deploy.json`
- Key evidence:
- `03-run-ready`: `allHomed=true`, `mode=auto`, `taskState=on`, `feedback=linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm`.
- `04-run-0500`: `runState=running`, `activeLine=9`, `velocity=2100`, line text includes `running | F 2100.0 ... cycle 19/190`.
- `06-run-7000`: `runState=running`, `activeLine=11`, `velocity=283.9176`, line text includes actual axis values and cycle.
- First post-deploy probe hit Puppeteer `Node is detached from document` while clicking STOP because the button node was re-rendered during the running UI update. This was a test-click issue, not a page failure.
15. Ran cloud STOP-specific post-deploy probe using DOM re-query for the STOP button:
- Output:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/cloud-run-stop-after-deploy/cloud-run-stop-after-deploy.json`
- Key evidence:
- `01-ready`: `runState=idle`, `allHomed=true`, `feedback=linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm`, `lineText="idle | F 3600.0 ... cycle 4/40"`.
- `02-running`: `runState=running`, `activeLine=9`, `loopActive=true`, `feedback=linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm`, `velocity=2100`, line text includes `running | F 2100.0 ... cycle 34/340`.
- `03-stopped`: `runState=stopped`, `loopActive=false`, `feedback=linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm`, line text includes `stopped | F 2100.0 ... cycle 50/500`.
16. Closed SSH session.
Files modified by this execution:
```text
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-23.docx
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/test-linuxcnc-source-run/*.png
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/cloud-run-after-deploy/*
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/cloud-run-stop-after-deploy/*
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md
```
Cloud deployment result:
- Deployed updated static app to `https://82.156.24.101:8092/`.
- Confirmed `RUN_READY` no longer loses `allHomed`.
- Confirmed `RUN` enters task/HAL feedback and advances line/feed/axis execution.
- Confirmed `STOP` stops the status loop.
---
Execution timestamp: 2026-06-22 17:55 EDT
User request:
- Complete all remaining work according to the `working_run` execution status.
Execution process:
1. Read the active workspace instructions and confirmed the required process log
target:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md`.
2. Read the current `working_run` status documents:
`README.md`,
`05-run-program-implementation-detailed-steps.md`,
`06-run-implementation-traceability-matrix-and-next-steps.md`,
`07-browser-run-feedback-evidence-complete-next-steps.md`,
`09-linear-units-meter-scene-complete-next-steps.md`, and
`10-run-control-tests-and-ini-cycle-steps.md`.
3. Determined that `10` had already completed ABORT/STEP/RUN-gate/INI-cycle
and xyzbc symmetry coverage, leaving the `09` browser desktop/mobile
meter-scale screenshot evidence and G20/G21 browser preview case as the
remaining executable work.
4. Inspected the browser evidence script
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs`, the
visualization code `app/src/visualization/five-axis-scene.js`, unit conversion
helpers, interpreter unit parsing, and store program-loading flow.
5. Updated `app/src/visualization/five-axis-scene.js` to expose
`data-three-path-bounds-meters` via `threePathBoundsMeters`, computed from
the rendered preview/executed/current-segment geometry in scene meters.
6. Extended `capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs` with a
`meter-scene-evidence` screenshot directory, meter-scale checks, mixed-unit
checks, and a canvas screenshot helper for meter-scene evidence.
7. Added browser case `08-meter-scene-desktop-mobile`, which captures desktop
and mobile canvas screenshots, records pixel stats and datasets, and asserts
`threeSceneUnits=m`, nonzero `threeLinearUnitScaleToMeters`,
`threePathFitBounds=ok`, meter-scale bounds, and nonblank canvas pixels.
8. Added browser case `09-g20-g21-mixed-units-preview`, which loads a local
mixed-unit program using `G20` then `G21`, verifies canonical motion contains
both `inch` and `mm`, verifies the scene is still in meters, and verifies
`1 inch` maps to `0.0254m` like `25.4 mm`.
9. Found that inserting the G20/G21 local program before the RUN case changed
the active program context for `06-running-rtcp-toolpath`. Fixed the evidence
script by restoring the vendored `impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc` program before
POWER/HOME/AUTO/RUN.
10. Ran `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs`;
result passed with `linear_unit_conversion_smoke=ok`.
11. Ran `npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build`; result passed with
`gmoccapy_static_build=ok`.
12. Ran `node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs`.
The first run returned 0 but printed the RUN-context warning described in
step 9. After the restore fix, re-ran the script and it exited 0 with no
failed-case output.
13. Read the generated JSON evidence and confirmed:
`meter-scene-evidence.json status=PASS`,
`run-preconditions-feedback.json status=PASS`, and all cases in
`toolpath-preview-cases.json` were PASS, including the new `08` and `09`
cases.
14. Ran `npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node`; result passed,
including kinematics, interpreter, INI, RUN preconditions, RUN feedback loop,
task/HAL runtime, full execution boundary, machine-file staging, RTCP store,
profile boundary, and linear unit conversion checks.
15. Added
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/11-browser-meter-scene-and-mixed-units-complete.md`
with the completion matrix, output files, validation commands, and current
conclusion.
16. Updated `working_run/README.md` to include the new `11` document and mark
the browser meter-scale and G20/G21 evidence as complete.
17. Appended this execution record to the required GPT process log.
Files changed in this execution:
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/visualization/five-axis-scene.js`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/toolpath-preview-cases.json`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/meter-scene-evidence.json`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/meter-scene-evidence/08-meter-scene-desktop.png`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/meter-scene-evidence/08-meter-scene-mobile.png`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/toolpath-preview-cases/09-g20-g21-mixed-units-preview.png`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/11-browser-meter-scene-and-mixed-units-complete.md`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/README.md`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md`
Verification:
```text
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build: PASS
node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node: PASS
```
## 2026-06-22 working_run final completion follow-up
User request:
```text
按“working_run”执行情况，完成剩余全部工作
```
Execution process:
1. Read the workspace instruction requiring every GPT/Codex execution log to be
appended to
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md`.
2. Inspected the current workspace from `/home/meswork/cnc_wams`.
3. Listed `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run` files and found documents
`01` through `11`, plus test assets and evidence files.
4. Checked `git status --short` and observed an already-dirty tree containing
prior implementation changes, generated screenshots/JSON, new tests, and
working_run records. No unrelated files were reverted.
5. Read
`07-browser-run-feedback-evidence-complete-next-steps.md` and confirmed the
browser RUN feedback evidence case had been completed and the next listed
work was ABORT/STEP/RUN-gate/INI-cycle/xyzbc coverage.
6. Read
`06-run-implementation-traceability-matrix-and-next-steps.md` and confirmed
its browser evidence and control-test items were historical open items later
handled by subsequent documents.
7. Read
`08-linuxcnc-source-test-assets.md` and confirmed the selected real
LinuxCNC assets were `xyzac-trt.ini` and `impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`, copied
into `working_run/test_linuxcnc_source`.
8. Read
`09-linear-units-meter-scene-complete-next-steps.md` and confirmed the
remaining items were browser desktop/mobile meter-scale screenshots and a
possible G20/G21 browser preview case.
9. Read
`10-run-control-tests-and-ini-cycle-steps.md` and confirmed ABORT, STEP,
granular RUN gates, INI-derived task/servo periods, and xyzbc RUN symmetry
tests were completed and verified.
10. Read
`11-browser-meter-scene-and-mixed-units-complete.md` and confirmed the
browser desktop/mobile meter-scale evidence and G20/G21 mixed-units preview
case were completed and verified.
11. Read `working_run/README.md` and confirmed it indexed documents through
`11`, with the remaining boundary statement already noting browser meter
and G20/G21 evidence completion.
12. Inspected
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs` and
confirmed it contained meter-scene evidence and mixed-units cases.
13. Listed node test files under
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node` and confirmed the relevant tests were
present, including `verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`,
`verify_run_preconditions.mjs`, and
`verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs`.
14. Read `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/package.json` and confirmed the
`build` and `smoke:node` scripts.
15. Ran
`node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs`;
result passed:
`run_preconditions_ini_profile_smoke=ok`,
`run_preconditions_kinematics_smoke=ok`,
`run_preconditions_machine_file_smoke=ok`.
16. Ran
`node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`;
result passed with `run_feedback_status_loop_smoke=ok`.
17. Ran
`node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs`;
result passed with `linear_unit_conversion_smoke=ok`.
18. Searched `working_run` for remaining words such as `未完成`, `剩余`,
`后续`, `下一步`, `TODO`, `pending`. The hits were historical early-stage
records or optional follow-ups; later documents `10` and `11` covered the
actionable required items.
19. Ran `npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build`; result passed
with `gmoccapy_static_build=ok`.
20. Ran `npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node`; result
passed, including kinematics, interpreter, INI runtime, RUN preconditions,
RUN feedback loop, task/HAL runtime, native task/HAL audit, full LinuxCNC
source checks, real LinuxCNC 5-axis program cases, full execution boundary,
machine-file staging, five-axis session, RTCP store, profile boundary, and
linear unit conversion.
21. Ran
`node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs`;
the browser evidence script returned exit code 0.
22. Read `qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/toolpath-preview-cases.json` and
confirmed all cases were PASS:
`01-home-toolpath`,
`02-operator-demo-toolpath`,
`03-arc-demo-toolpath`,
`04-clear-preview-reference`,
`05-vendored-impeller-toolpath`,
`08-meter-scene-desktop-mobile`,
`09-g20-g21-mixed-units-preview`,
`06-running-rtcp-toolpath`,
and `07-run-preconditions-and-feedback`.
23. Read
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/run-preconditions-feedback.json` and
confirmed `status=PASS`.
24. Read
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/meter-scene-evidence.json` and
confirmed `status=PASS`.
25. Added
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/12-working-run-final-completion-record.md`
documenting that the required remaining working_run items are complete,
mapping early historical open items to later completion documents, listing
verification commands, and preserving only optional enhancements.
26. Updated `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/README.md` to include the new
`12` document and state that the required working_run follow-up items have
all been rechecked and passed.
27. Appended this execution record to the required GPT process log.
Files changed in this follow-up execution:
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/12-working-run-final-completion-record.md`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/README.md`
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md`
Verification:
```text
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs: PASS
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs: PASS
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node: PASS
node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs: PASS
toolpath-preview-cases.json: all cases PASS
run-preconditions-feedback.json: PASS
meter-scene-evidence.json: PASS
```
## 2026-06-22 18:10:59 EDT working_run final recheck
User request:
```text
按“working_run”执行情况，完成剩余全部工作
```
Execution process:
1. Read the workspace `AGENTS.md` instruction requiring every GPT/Codex
execution process log to be appended to
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md`.
2. Checked repository status with `git status --short`; confirmed the working
tree already contained implementation, test, documentation, browser evidence,
screenshot, and log changes from the ongoing `working_run` effort.
3. Listed `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run` and confirmed documents
`01` through `12` exist, with `12-working-run-final-completion-record.md`
recording final completion.
4. Read `working_run/README.md`,
`10-run-control-tests-and-ini-cycle-steps.md`,
`11-browser-meter-scene-and-mixed-units-complete.md`, and
`12-working-run-final-completion-record.md`.
5. Determined that the actionable historical remaining items were already
mapped to later completion records:
`06 -> 07` for browser RUN feedback evidence,
`07 -> 10` for ABORT/STEP/RUN gate/xyzbc symmetric tests,
and `09/10 -> 11` for desktop/mobile meter-scene evidence and G20/G21
mixed-unit browser preview.
6. Re-ran
`node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs`;
result passed with:
`run_preconditions_ini_profile_smoke=ok`,
`run_preconditions_kinematics_smoke=ok`,
`run_preconditions_machine_file_smoke=ok`.
7. Re-ran
`node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`;
result passed with `run_feedback_status_loop_smoke=ok`.
8. Re-ran
`node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs`;
result passed with `linear_unit_conversion_smoke=ok`.
9. Re-ran `npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build`;
result passed with `gmoccapy_static_build=ok`.
10. Re-ran `npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node`;
result passed, including kinematics, interpreter, INI runtime, RUN
preconditions, RUN feedback loop, task/HAL runtime, native task/HAL audit,
full LinuxCNC 5-axis source checks, real LinuxCNC 5-axis program cases,
full execution boundary, machine-file staging, five-axis session, RTCP
store, profile boundary, and linear unit conversion.
11. Re-ran
`node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs`;
the browser evidence script returned exit code 0.
12. Parsed browser evidence JSON outputs and confirmed:
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/toolpath-preview-cases.json`
has nine PASS cases,
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/run-preconditions-feedback.json`
has `status=PASS`, and
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/meter-scene-evidence.json`
has `status=PASS`.
13. Confirmed no additional code edits were needed in this final recheck turn.
14. Appended this execution process record to the required GPT process log.
Verification:
```text
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs: PASS
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs: PASS
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build: PASS
npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run smoke:node: PASS
node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs: PASS
toolpath-preview-cases.json: nine cases PASS
run-preconditions-feedback.json: PASS
meter-scene-evidence.json: PASS
```
## 2026-06-22 18:22:46 EDT test_linuxcnc_source RUN browser report
User request:
```text
使用“test_linuxcnc_source”中的文件，进行“run”测试。刀具路径预览、G代码执行每行过程显示、执行的刀具轨迹、实时轴值显示。截屏保存并编写测试全部过程，图文并茂写入word格式的测试文档中。
```
Execution process:
1. Listed `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/test_linuxcnc_source` and
confirmed the test assets are `xyzac-trt.ini` and
`impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`.
2. Inspected the existing QA browser capture and DOCX generation scripts under
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test`, including
`capture-toolpath-preview-cases.mjs`,
`generate-toolpath-preview-docx-report.mjs`, and
`generate-docx-report.mjs`.
3. Inspected application entry/state/runtime code to confirm available browser
automation APIs:
`window.webRtcp5AxisSimulation.stageMachineFiles`,
`dispatch`, `getState`, LinuxCNC source selection, RUN controls, G-code row
active-line rendering, DRO rendering, and task/HAL runtime feedback state.
4. Compared SHA-256 hashes for the `test_linuxcnc_source` files and the
corresponding vendored LinuxCNC files:
`impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc` hash
`e90f0b4b6c43809da94a8170ee1029b5afc3e1bbe9bf2ae66298a8baefad013c`
matched the vendored source, and `xyzac-trt.ini` hash
`4b7fa6cb8d3e7031e769b3e0c779b586b67cfd45d715985f40d4ec23c662dc97`
matched the vendored INI.
5. Added a dedicated QA script:
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs`.
6. The script starts a local static server, launches headless Chrome, loads the
app, stages machine files using the exact
`working_run/test_linuxcnc_source/xyzac-trt.ini` text, selects the matching
LinuxCNC impeller G-code source, verifies source hashes, prepares POWER/HOME/
AUTO/TCP, starts RUN, samples the live RUN state at 200ms, 500ms, 1000ms,
2000ms, and 5000ms, captures screenshots, stops the run, writes JSON
evidence, and generates a DOCX report with embedded screenshots and tables.
7. Ran
`node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs`.
8. The script completed with:
`test_linuxcnc_source_run_status=PASS`.
9. Reviewed
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json`
and confirmed all checks passed:
test INI used, G-code hash match, toolpath preview visible, TCP/tool-axis
visible, five RUN samples captured, active G-code line synced with UI,
executed path visible, live axis values sourced from
`linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm`, task/HAL cycles advanced, and STOP stopped
the status loop.
10. Confirmed screenshots were written under
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/test-linuxcnc-source-run`:
initial UI, staged test INI, toolpath preview, ready-before-run, five RUN
samples, and stop-after-run.
11. Confirmed the Word report was generated:
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-22.docx`.
12. Appended this execution process record to the required GPT process log.
Files created:
```text
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-22.docx
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/test-linuxcnc-source-run/*.png
```
Verification:
```text
node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs: PASS
test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json status: PASS
RUN samples: 5
active line/UI line: 30/30, 55/55, 80/80, 105/105, 125/125
feedback source: linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm
toolpath preview points: 1498
Word report: qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-22.docx
```
## 2026-06-22 18:33:50 EDT feed-rate execution verification
User request:
```text
G代码应该按真实的进给速度执行。请核实验证
```
Execution process:
1. Inspected
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/execution-timing.js`.
It estimates segment durations from canonical motion distance, feed rate,
profile velocity limits, and feed/rapid overrides, but its
`semanticBoundary` is explicitly
`linuxcnc_canonical_motion_timing_estimate_not_planner_queue`.
2. Searched app/runtime/sdk code for feed, velocity, active line, task cycle,
servo cycle, and elapsed-time handling.
3. Reviewed
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json`.
The five RUN samples reported constant velocity `3600`, active lines
`30,55,80,105,125`, task cycles `33,58,83,108,128`, and servo cycles
`330,580,830,1080,1280`.
4. Inspected `wasm-port/runtime/sdk/src/linuxcnc-task-hal.js`; `runCycles`
forwards only cycle periods and task cycle count into
`lctask_run_cycles`.
5. Inspected
`wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp`.
6. Found `enqueue_linear_move_from_line(...)` appends
`"velocity":60` to every motion command, independent of the G-code line's
`F` word or modal feed mode.
7. Found `lctask_run_cycles(...)` enqueues one parsed program line per task
cycle while `interp_state == "READING"`, so active-line progression is
cycle-count based, not elapsed-distance/feed based.
8. Confirmed the current browser RUN evidence validates task/HAL feedback,
line highlighting, execution trace, and DRO synchronization, but it does
not validate real feed-rate paced execution.
9. Appended this verification record to the required GPT process log.
Conclusion:
```text
Current RUN is not yet verified as real feed-rate execution.
Current task/HAL WASM simulation uses fixed velocity=60 units/s
and advances program lines by task cycle, not by G-code F/feed timing.
The existing execution-timing module can estimate feed-based segment timing,
but it is not the authoritative pacing source for task/HAL RUN.
```
## 2026-06-22 18:40:24 EDT feed-rate RUN fix programming document
User request:
```text
创建新目录，编写解决“ F 用作真实运行速”的编程文档
“当前 G-code interpreter 确实能解析 F，execution-timing.js 也能做 feed-based timing estimate；但 task/HAL RUN 执行链路没有把 G-code 的 F 用作真实运行速度，而是在 C++ wrapper 层固定用了 velocity=60。“
```
Execution process:
1. Reviewed existing project directories and `working_run` structure to choose
a new focused documentation location.
2. Re-read source evidence in
`wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp`,
including the fixed `velocity=60` in `enqueue_linear_move_from_line(...)`
and one-line-per-task-cycle behavior in `lctask_run_cycles(...)`.
3. Re-read `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/execution-timing.js` and
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-interpreter-runtime.js`
to document the existing F/feedRate parsing and timing-estimate capabilities.
4. Created new directory:
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/feed-rate-run-fix`.
5. Added
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/feed-rate-run-fix/README.md`.
6. The document covers the current problem, source evidence, required behavior,
recommended architecture, G94/G93 feed semantics, implementation targets,
task/HAL motion-plan API proposal, C++ runtime state changes, elapsed-time
RUN loop design, test plan, browser evidence updates, acceptance criteria,
risks, and suggested implementation order.
7. Checked the created document length with `wc -l`; it contains 726 lines.
8. Appended this execution process record to the required GPT process log.
Files created:
```text
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/feed-rate-run-fix/README.md
```
## 2026-06-22 18:54:04 EDT feed-rate RUN implementation
User request:
```text
按“web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/feed-rate-run-fix“工作，修复feed
```
Execution process:
1. Read workspace AGENTS instructions and the feed-rate run-fix README.
2. Inspected the existing task/HAL C++ wrapper, SDK boundary, app runtime
wrappers, store RUN path, interpreter runtime, execution timing, and
existing node/WASM tests.
3. Preserved unrelated dirty worktree changes and limited direct edits to the
feed RUN path and focused tests.
4. Added interpreter feed-mode tracking for `G93/G94`; motion events now carry
`feedMode`.
5. Updated execution timing to emit `startAxes`, `endAxes`, `feedMode`, and
per-event linear unit aware distances; added first-stage `G93` inverse-time
timing as `durationSeconds = 60 / F`.
6. Added a task/HAL motion-plan API through:
`lctask_load_program_motion_plan_json`,
`createLinuxCncTaskHalSdk().loadProgramMotionPlan(...)`,
app direct runtime wrapper, and worker runtime wrapper.
7. Reworked task/HAL RUN execution so a loaded motion plan advances by elapsed
task time, interpolates axis pose inside the active segment, forwards the
interpolated pose to motion/HAL, and sets velocity from
`velocityMmPerMin / 60` instead of fixed `velocity=60`.
8. Kept the old text parser path only as fallback/MDI support and changed its
simple F handling so it no longer blindly emits fixed velocity for parsed
lines.
9. Updated store RUN flow to build/load the task/HAL feed motion plan before
`EMC_TASK_PLAN_RUN`, block RUN if the feed motion plan cannot be loaded,
and mark applied task/HAL feedback as `linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm`.
10. Added SDK-level regression coverage proving a slow long segment remains
in-progress after elapsed time and reports `currentVel` from F-derived
timing rather than fixed 60 units/s.
11. Updated run feedback loop coverage to attach the interpreter runtime so
task/HAL RUN uses the generated feed motion plan, and asserted feedback is
task/HAL sourced with non-fixed velocity.
12. Added unit/timing coverage for mixed `G20/G21` linear units and `G93`
inverse-time feed mode.
13. Rebuilt task/HAL WASM with the new export.
14. Verified syntax and whitespace with `node --check` and `git diff --check`.
15. Ran validation commands:
`./wasm-port/tools/build_task_hal_wasm.sh`,
`node wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_wasm.mjs`,
`node wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs`,
`node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`,
`node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs`,
`node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linuxcnc_interpreter_runtime.mjs`,
`node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs`,
and `npm run build` in `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app`.
Files modified for this request:
```text
wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp
wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.hh
wasm-port/runtime/sdk/src/linuxcnc-task-hal.js
wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs
wasm-port/tools/build_task_hal_wasm.sh
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/execution-timing.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-interpreter-runtime.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-worker-client.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-worker.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linear_unit_conversion.mjs
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
```
## 2026-06-22 19:01:07 EDT actual G-code feed RUN validation
User request:
```text
使用实际程序进行验证G代码程序，按程序要求的feed执行
```
Execution process:
1. Reviewed the real test program under
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/test_linuxcnc_source/impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`
and confirmed it uses `G93` inverse-time feed with real `F318`, `F159`,
and `F636` feed words.
2. Read existing browser QA script
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs`.
3. Adjusted store timing selection so `G93` programs use the feed-mode aware
execution timing path instead of the optional TP planner timing samples.
4. Added Node validation
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs`.
5. The Node validation loads the actual `impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`, runs the
LinuxCNC interpreter, builds feed-aware timing, loads the task/HAL motion
plan, runs task/HAL cycles, and checks that task/HAL feedback velocities
come from program feed timing rather than fixed `3600 mm/min`.
6. Verified actual program timing values:
`F159` inverse-time duration is `0.37735849056603776s`, and `F636`
inverse-time duration is `0.09433962264150944s`.
7. Verified task/HAL feedback exposed multiple distinct velocities for the
real program, including `2100`, `635.748`, `283.918`, `59.123`, `58.196`,
and no fixed `3600`.
8. Updated the browser QA capture to record feed evidence per sample:
actual velocity, expected timing velocity, feed rate, feed mode, and segment
duration.
9. Extended the browser RUN sample points to include `17000ms`, then ran:
`node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs`.
10. Browser validation completed with `test_linuxcnc_source_run_status=PASS`.
11. Browser report files generated:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json`
and
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-22.docx`.
12. Browser report checks passed for source hash, toolpath preview, task/HAL
feedback source, non-fixed feed velocity, changing feed velocity, G93
inverse-time feed use, task/HAL cycle advance, and STOP loop shutdown.
Validation commands:
```text
node --check qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs
node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs
```
Files modified or created for this validation:
```text
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-22.docx
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/test-linuxcnc-source-run/
```
## 2026-06-23 HTTPS deployment on 8092
User request:
```text
网站部署成https
IP 82.156.24.101
SSH user ubuntu
Port 8092
```
Execution process:
1. Read workspace instructions from `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/AGENTS.md`.
2. Identified the web app under
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app`.
3. Checked the app scripts in `app/package.json`; the static build command is
`npm run build`, which runs `node scripts/build-static.mjs`.
4. Ran `npm run build` in `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app`.
Result: `gmoccapy_static_build=ok`.
5. Verified SSH connectivity to `ubuntu@82.156.24.101` using a temporary
askpass helper.
6. Uploaded the freshly built `app/dist` contents as a tarball to the remote
host.
7. Extracted the tarball into `/var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim` and set ownership
to `www-data:www-data`.
8. Confirmed TLS certificate files exist on the remote host:
`/etc/letsencrypt/live/82.156.24.101/fullchain.pem` and
`/etc/letsencrypt/live/82.156.24.101/privkey.pem`.
9. Updated `/etc/nginx/sites-available/web-rtcp-5axis-sim` to serve
`/var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim` on `listen 8092 ssl http2` and
`listen [::]:8092 ssl http2`.
10. Created a backup of the previous nginx site config:
`/etc/nginx/sites-available/web-rtcp-5axis-sim.https.bak.20260623083119`.
11. Ran `sudo nginx -t`.
Result: configuration syntax was OK and test was successful.
12. Restarted nginx with `sudo systemctl restart nginx`.
13. Verified the remote local endpoint:
`curl -k https://127.0.0.1:8092/`.
Result: HTTP `200`; response began with the app HTML document.
14. Verified the public HTTPS endpoint from the local workspace:
`curl -k https://82.156.24.101:8092/`.
Result: HTTP `200`, content type `text/html`, download size `410`.
15. Confirmed nginx is listening on `0.0.0.0:8092` and `[::]:8092`.
16. Checked `git status --short`; it showed pre-existing dirty worktree
changes unrelated to the deployment plus this log directory/file.
Validation commands:
```text
npm run build
sudo nginx -t
sudo systemctl restart nginx
curl -k https://127.0.0.1:8092/
curl -k https://82.156.24.101:8092/
```
Deployment result:
```text
https://82.156.24.101:8092/
public_https_status=200
content_type=text/html
```
## 2026-06-23 Public HTTPS Chrome RUN test
User request:
```text
你测试一下“https://82.156.24.101:8092/”，使用本机的chrom.
“run”根本不好用
```
Execution process:
1. Verified local browser availability:
`/usr/bin/google-chrome` and `/usr/bin/google-chrome-stable` exist.
2. Verified the public HTTPS endpoint with curl:
`https://82.156.24.101:8092/` returned HTTP `200`, content type
`text/html`.
3. Read the existing QA browser automation scripts under
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/`, especially `run-site-test.mjs`.
4. Ran `node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/run-site-test.mjs`, which uses
`/usr/bin/google-chrome` and targets `https://82.156.24.101:8092/`.
5. Read the generated report
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/site-test-report.json`.
That broad test reported `Run 程序` as PASS, but also showed
`Step 单步执行` as FAIL.
6. Because the broad test could hide the user's reported RUN problem, ran a
focused Puppeteer test with local Google Chrome against the same public
HTTPS URL.
7. The focused test captured screenshots under:
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/public-https-run-debug/`.
8. The focused test wrote:
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/public-https-run-debug.json`.
9. The focused test reproduced the RUN problem:
`runStarted=false`, final `runState=idle`, active line stayed `1`,
all sampled velocities stayed `0`, and executed path points stayed `1`.
10. The pre-RUN state showed `powerOn=false`, `taskState=estop-reset`,
`allHomed=false`, mode `auto`, and UI status `power off / clear / auto`.
11. The `HOME` wait timed out, so the machine never reached the expected
powered and homed state.
12. Despite those failed prerequisites, the RUN button snapshot showed
`disabled=false`, so the UI exposes a clickable RUN button even when
execution cannot actually start.
13. There were no browser console errors, page errors, or failed requests in
the focused test, so this is an application state/control-flow issue
rather than an HTTPS/network loading failure.
Key evidence:
```text
public_https_run_debug_json=/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/public-https-run-debug.json
runStarted=false
finalRunState=idle
activeLines=[1]
movingVelocityCount=0
velocities=[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
executedPoints=[1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
consoleErrorCount=0
pageErrorCount=0
requestFailureCount=0
beforeRun.status="power off / clear / auto"
beforeRun.machine.powerOn=false
beforeRun.machine.allHomed=false
beforeRun.runButton.disabled=false
```
Conclusion:
```text
Confirmed: public HTTPS page loads, but RUN is not functionally usable in the
focused local-Chrome test because the machine never reaches powered/homed ready
state and the RUN button remains clickable without starting execution.
```
## 2026-06-23 RUN repair using LinuxCNC source behavior
User request:
```text
你先参考“/home/meswork/cnc_wams/linuxcnc”的源程序处理“run”的方式，再修复这个仿真项目的“run”
```
Execution process:
1. Referenced LinuxCNC source under `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/linuxcnc`.
2. Read `linuxcnc/src/emc/task/emctaskmain.cc` and confirmed the real RUN path:
machine state must be `ON`, task mode `AUTO`, interpreter state `IDLE`, and
the machine must be homed before `EMC_TASK_PLAN_RUN` is accepted.
3. Confirmed in LinuxCNC source that `EMC_TASK_PLAN_RUN` rejects execution when
`all_homed()` is false and `no_force_homing` is not enabled.
4. Read the Python UI command binding in
`linuxcnc/src/emc/usr_intf/axis/extensions/emcmodule.cc`, confirming `home`
sends `EMC_JOINT_HOME` and auto run sends `EMC_TASK_PLAN_RUN`.
5. Fixed the web simulation state flow in
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js`:
- Loading a LinuxCNC G-code source no longer forces task mode to `auto`.
- The user can power on, stay in manual mode, home, then switch to auto/run.
- Task/HAL session initialization preserves and replays existing
power/home/mode state instead of resetting the UI path to `ESTOP_RESET`.
- `TOGGLE_POWER` updates UI state immediately before the async Task/HAL
command completes.
- `HOME` sends `EMC_JOINT_HOME` to Task/HAL and marks the machine homed in
the UI state.
6. Fixed the Task/HAL WASM shim in
`wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp`:
- Added `EMC_JOINT_HOME` handling.
- Kept the existing feed-timed motion plan support used by the RUN feedback
loop.
7. Updated bottom controls in
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js` to use
`gateLinuxCncTaskAction`, so controls like RUN/HOME/STEP reflect LinuxCNC
task policy and disabled controls show the block reason.
8. Updated
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime.mjs`
so test setup no longer toggles power off after session initialization.
9. Rebuilt Task/HAL WASM:
`bash wasm-port/tools/build_task_hal_wasm.sh`.
Result: `linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm_build=ok`.
10. Ran syntax checks for changed JS files.
11. Ran app build:
`npm run build`.
Result: `gmoccapy_static_build=ok`.
12. Ran focused node regression tests:
- `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime.mjs`
- `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`
- `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs`
Results passed, including `linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime_smoke=ok` and
`run_feedback_status_loop_smoke=ok`.
13. Redeployed the rebuilt static site to
`/var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim` on `82.156.24.101`.
14. Verified remote nginx config with `nginx -t` and restarted nginx.
15. Verified remote local HTTPS endpoint returned HTTP `200`.
16. Ran local Google Chrome/Puppeteer focused RUN test against
`https://82.156.24.101:8092/`.
17. The public HTTPS Chrome test generated:
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/public-https-run-debug.json`
and screenshots under
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/public-https-run-debug/`.
18. Public Chrome RUN test passed the previously failing behavior:
`runStarted=true`, `finalRunState=complete`, active lines advanced from
`1` to `10`, velocity samples were nonzero, and feedback source was
`linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm`.
Validation commands:
```text
bash wasm-port/tools/build_task_hal_wasm.sh
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js
npm run build
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime.mjs
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_preconditions.mjs
curl -k https://127.0.0.1:8092/
local Google Chrome Puppeteer RUN test against https://82.156.24.101:8092/
```
Public Chrome evidence:
```text
public_https_run_debug_json=/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/public-https-run-debug.json
runStarted=true
finalRunState=complete
activeLines=[1,10]
distinctActiveLineCount=2
distinctPoseCount=5
movingVelocityCount=9
velocities=[3600,2100,2100,2100,2100,2100,2100,2100,2100]
feedbackSources=["linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm"]
consoleErrorCount=0
pageErrorCount=0
requestFailureCount=0
```
Files changed:
```text
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_linuxcnc_task_hal_runtime.mjs
wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp
wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.hh
wasm-port/runtime/sdk/src/linuxcnc-task-hal.js
```
## 2026-06-22 19:24:00 EDT toolpath preview correctness check
User request:
```text
和对刀具预览路径是否正确？
```
Execution process:
1. Inspected current browser validation report
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json`.
2. Checked the preview step `03-toolpath-preview` from the report.
3. Confirmed the loaded program is the real LinuxCNC source program
`configs/sim/axis/vismach/5axis/table-rotary-tilting/demos/impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`.
4. Confirmed `programExecutionSourceMode` is `linuxcnc-interpreter-wasm`.
5. Confirmed the canvas dataset reports
`threeToolpathPreviewSource=linuxcnc_interpreter_canonical_motion`.
6. Confirmed `threeNoGcodeSemanticsGeneration=ok`, meaning the preview layer is
not generating separate G-code semantics.
7. Read `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/visualization/five-axis-scene.js` and
verified `buildProgramPreviewPoints(...)` maps
`state.programExecution.motion` canonical motion axes into scene meters.
8. Verified the report shows `motionEventCount=4492` and
`threePathPoints=1498`; source inspection showed this is due to
`limitPoints(...)` sampling with `MAX_TOOLPATH_POINTS`, not because the
preview path uses fixture data.
9. Confirmed preview visual evidence: `threePathFitBounds=ok`,
`threeRapidFeedVisualDistinction=ok`, `threeTcpMarker=sphere`,
`threeToolAxisMarker=line`, and screenshot
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/test-linuxcnc-source-run/03-toolpath-preview.png`.
10. Appended this execution-process record to the required GPT process log.
## 2026-06-22 19:27:26 EDT full canonical toolpath points validation
User request:
```text
“报告里 motionEventCount=4492，但 threePathPoints=1498“比抽样，使用实际数据
```
Execution process:
1. Re-read `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/visualization/five-axis-scene.js`
and located the preview point limiting path:
`MAX_TOOLPATH_POINTS = 1600` and `limitPoints(...)`.
2. Confirmed the previous browser report had `motionEventCount=4492` and
`threePathPoints=1498`.
3. Changed `MAX_TOOLPATH_POINTS` to `Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY` so preview
geometry uses the full LinuxCNC canonical motion point list instead of
sampled points.
4. Updated
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs` to add
a report check named `刀具路径使用完整 canonical motion 点`, asserting
`threePathPoints === motionEventCount`.
5. Ran syntax checks for the visualization and QA script.
6. Ran `npm run build` in `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app`; build passed.
7. Re-ran actual browser validation:
`node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs`.
8. Browser validation completed with `test_linuxcnc_source_run_status=PASS`.
9. Verified the refreshed report now shows:
`motionEventCount=4492`, `threePathPoints=4492`,
`threeFeedPathPoints=4306`, and `threeRapidPathPoints=186`.
10. Verified the new full-point check passed with detail:
`threePathPoints=4492, motionEventCount=4492`.
11. Appended this execution-process record to the required GPT process log.
Validation commands:
```text
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/visualization/five-axis-scene.js
node --check qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs
npm run build
node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs
```
Files modified or regenerated:
```text
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/visualization/five-axis-scene.js
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-22.docx
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/test-linuxcnc-source-run/
```
## 2026-06-22 Run activeLine line-by-line fix
User request: `run还是不能一行一行执行。修复程序`.
Process summary:
1. Inspected workspace rules in `AGENTS.md` and `wasm-port/AGENTS.md`; noted required process log append.
2. Reviewed existing dirty worktree and avoided reverting unrelated existing changes.
3. Traced Run state flow through:
- `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js`
- `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js`
- `wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp`
4. Reproduced the root cause with the boat LinuxCNC source program: ordinary interpreter output had only sparse canonical motion lines `9,10`, which made task/HAL Run appear to jump to the end instead of stepping through source G-code lines.
5. Added task/HAL motion-plan support for source-line fallback segments in `linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js`; when canonical motion is too sparse but source G-code has executable rows, the task/HAL plan now includes per-source-line timed segments.
6. Passed `programLines` from store motion-plan loading into `buildTaskHalProgramMotionPlan`.
7. Updated `linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp` so the task/HAL runtime tracks both compact executable line count and original source line count, and no longer clamps planned source-line numbers down to the compact non-comment line count.
8. Rebuilt task/HAL WASM with `bash wasm-port/tools/build_task_hal_wasm.sh`.
9. Strengthened `verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs` so it waits for and asserts multiple distinct monotonic active lines, preventing a regression back to `activeLines=[1,10]`.
10. Verified boat fallback plan generation locally: original motion lines were `9,10`, but generated task/HAL plan had `1857` source-line segments and first lines `2,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20`.
11. Ran Node/WASM regression tests successfully:
- `node wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs`
- `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs`
- `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`
12. Ran local Chrome/Puppeteer evidence against the local static app for `boat-xyzac.ngc`; evidence written to `qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/local-chrome-boat-run-line-evidence.json`.
13. Local Chrome evidence showed `local_chrome_boat_activeLines=9,10,12` and `local_chrome_boat_historyLines=9,10,11,12`, confirming the browser no longer shows only `[1,10]`.
14. Did not deploy to public `https://82.156.24.101:8092/`; user requested local validation first.
Validation commands:
```text
bash wasm-port/tools/build_task_hal_wasm.sh
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
git diff --check -- web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
node wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
```
Files modified or generated by this execution:
```text
wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/local-chrome-boat-run-line-evidence.json
wasm-port/build/wasm/task-hal/linuxcnc_task_hal.js
wasm-port/build/wasm/task-hal/linuxcnc_task_hal.wasm
```
## 2026-06-22 LinuxCNC source-line task/HAL/HAL-pin run fix
User request: reference `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/linuxcnc` source program and fix the previous interpretation that `openedLineCount` was a compressed non-comment executable count. The requested behavior is that task and HAL cooperate, push line status to the frontend in real time, and line numbers fully account for comments and blank lines.
Process summary:
1. Inspected LinuxCNC upstream source under `/home/meswork/cnc_wams/linuxcnc`.
2. Confirmed LinuxCNC interpreter semantics:
- `rs274ngc_pre.cc` documents that `_setup.sequence_number` is incremented by reads.
- `interp_convert.cc` passes `block->line_number` into canonical motion calls such as `STRAIGHT_TRAVERSE` and `STRAIGHT_FEED`.
- This means motion line numbers are source-file line numbers, not compressed executable-row indexes; comments and blank lines affect later source line numbers.
3. Updated task/HAL WASM runtime state in `wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp`:
- `openedLineCount` now reports source-file line count.
- `openedSourceLineCount` also reports source-file line count.
- Added `executableLineCount` for the internal compact fallback list.
- Non-motion-plan fallback still uses `executableLineCount`, while motion-plan execution and completion use source-line numbers.
4. Updated frontend task/HAL normalization in `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js`:
- exposes `motionProgramLine`, `halProgramLine`, `activeLineSource`, and `activeLineHalSynced`.
- active line prefers task/motion status and falls back to HAL pin only if needed.
5. Updated store feedback in `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js`:
- completion uses `openedSourceLineCount || openedLineCount`.
- runtime feedback records motion/HAL pin line values and sync status so frontend evidence proves line updates are task/HAL/HAL-pin driven.
6. Added/updated WASM SDK regression in `wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs`:
- staged a program with a leading comment, blank line, comment-only line, and source moves on lines 3 and 5.
- asserted `openedLineCount=6`, `openedSourceLineCount=6`, `executableLineCount=3`.
- asserted motion status and HAL pin both report source lines 3 and 5.
7. Strengthened `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`:
- feedback history must come from `linuxcnc-task-motion-hal-wasm`.
- active line source must be `motion-status`.
- line, motion program line, and HAL program-line pin must all match.
8. Rebuilt task/HAL WASM.
9. Ran Node/WASM verification successfully.
10. Ran local Chrome/Puppeteer verification against the local static app using `boat-xyzac.ngc`.
11. Browser evidence written to `qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/local-chrome-boat-run-line-evidence.json`.
12. Browser evidence showed:
- `local_chrome_boat_activeLines=9,10,12`
- `local_chrome_boat_historyLines=9,10,11,12`
- `local_chrome_boat_task_hal_synced=true`
13. Did not deploy to public URL in this run.
Validation commands:
```text
bash wasm-port/tools/build_task_hal_wasm.sh
node --check wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
node wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs
git diff --check -- wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/local-chrome-boat-run-line-evidence.json
```
Files modified or generated by this execution:
```text
wasm-port/runtime/core/linuxcnc_wrap/linuxcnc_task_hal_wasm.cpp
wasm-port/tests/wasm/node/verify_task_hal_sdk.mjs
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/local-chrome-boat-run-line-evidence.json
wasm-port/build/wasm/task-hal/linuxcnc_task_hal.js
wasm-port/build/wasm/task-hal/linuxcnc_task_hal.wasm
```
## 2026-06-22 Cloud repository sync
User request: sync the current workspace state to the cloud repository at `http://154.8.160.151:3000/wangdequan/cnc_wams` using the provided credentials.
Process summary:
1. Confirmed repository root with `git rev-parse --show-toplevel`:
- `/home/meswork/cnc_wams`
2. Confirmed current branch with `git branch --show-current`:
- `master`
3. Confirmed remote configuration with `git remote -v`:
- `origin http://154.8.160.151:3000/wangdequan/cnc_wams (fetch)`
- `origin http://154.8.160.151:3000/wangdequan/cnc_wams (push)`
4. Confirmed git user identity with `git config user.name && git config user.email`:
- `wangdequan`
- `wangdequan@meswork.com`
5. Confirmed there were local modified and untracked files with `git status --short`.
6. Staged and committed all current workspace changes:
- command: `git add -A && git commit -m "feat: sync latest run execution updates"`
- result: created commit `8d3177cb73abc588d04496b7c0890c00194a0d2b`
7. Pushed `master` to the cloud repository using authenticated HTTP push with masked credentials:
- command: `git push "http://wangdequan:******@154.8.160.151:3000/wangdequan/cnc_wams" master`
- result: push succeeded
- remote update: `0b1aad3..8d3177c master -> master`
8. Verified post-push state:
- `git rev-parse HEAD` returned `8d3177cb73abc588d04496b7c0890c00194a0d2b`
- `git status --short` returned clean output
9. Recorded this execution log in `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md` per workspace instruction.
Execution timestamp:
- `2026-06-22 21:47:33 EDT`
Validation commands:
```text
git rev-parse --show-toplevel
git branch --show-current
git remote -v
git status --short
git config user.name && git config user.email
git add -A && git commit -m "feat: sync latest run execution updates"
git push "http://wangdequan:******@154.8.160.151:3000/wangdequan/cnc_wams" master
git rev-parse HEAD
date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z'
git status --short
```
Files modified or generated by this execution:
```text
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md
```
## 2026-06-22 22:54:09 EDT website packaging of test_linuxcnc_source
User request: based on the previous round, package the files under
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/test_linuxcnc_source`
into the website, make sure the programs shown in the `LinuxCNC 5-axis source`
UI are uploaded with the site/server bundle, and ensure the source programs are
used correctly.
Process summary:
1. Inspected the current website packaging and LinuxCNC source loading path.
- Read `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/scripts/build-static.mjs`.
- Read `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-machine-file-staging.js`.
- Confirmed the UI source selector is backed by machine-file staging and
vendored LinuxCNC demo files.
2. Verified the relevant source assets.
- Confirmed `working_run/test_linuxcnc_source` currently contains:
- `xyzac-trt.ini`
- `impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`
- Verified both files are byte-identical to their vendored LinuxCNC source
counterparts by SHA-256:
- `xyzac-trt.ini`
- `impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`
3. Implemented website packaging for the test source directory.
- Updated `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/scripts/build-static.mjs`.
- Added `copyBundledTestLinuxCncSourceAssets()`.
- Build output now copies:
- `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/test_linuxcnc_source/*`
to
- `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/dist/working_run/test_linuxcnc_source/*`
4. Updated machine-file staging source resolution.
- Updated `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-machine-file-staging.js`.
- Added `DEFAULT_TEST_SOURCE_ROOT_URLS`.
- Updated `sourceUrlsFor()` to prefer packaged `working_run/test_linuxcnc_source`
assets for:
- `configs/sim/axis/vismach/5axis/table-rotary-tilting/xyzac-trt.ini`
- `configs/sim/axis/vismach/5axis/table-rotary-tilting/demos/impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`
- Preserved vendored LinuxCNC URLs as fallback so the existing source list and
staging flow continue to work.
5. Built and validated the website package.
- Ran `npm run build` in `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app`.
- Confirmed:
- `app/dist/working_run/test_linuxcnc_source/xyzac-trt.ini`
- `app/dist/working_run/test_linuxcnc_source/impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`
exist in the published output.
6. Ran validation commands.
- `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_machine_file_staging.mjs`
-> `machine_file_staging_smoke=ok`
- `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs`
-> `impeller_feed_task_hal_run=ok`
- `bash web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/browser/verify_gmoccapy_dist_browser.sh`
-> `gmoccapy_dist_smoke=ok`
7. Started a local HTTP server for the built site.
- Working directory:
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/dist`
- URL:
`http://127.0.0.1:4173/`
- Confirmed HTTP 200 for:
- `/index.html`
- `/working_run/test_linuxcnc_source/impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`
Files modified by this execution:
```text
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/scripts/build-static.mjs
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-machine-file-staging.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md
```
## 2026-06-22 23:30:02 EDT cloud short-viewport gcode panel diagnosis and fix
User report: on the cloud-hosted site, the G-code display area showed only one
line with a large blank area above it.
Process summary:
1. Reproduced the issue under a short viewport similar to the user screenshot.
- Used a local browser run at `848x331`.
- Confirmed the problem was reproducible with
`impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`.
2. Measured DOM/layout state.
- Verified the G-code program was not a one-line program.
- Confirmed the loaded impeller program had `4507` lines.
- Confirmed the status text
`8 staged / configs/sim/axis/vismach/5axis/table-rotary-tilting/demos/impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`
is styled with `white-space: nowrap` and `text-overflow: ellipsis`, so the
one-line symptom was not caused by that text wrapping.
3. Found the actual cause.
- The shell layout had hard minimum viewport assumptions and an unconstrained
`#app` container combination that could cause the grid to expand beyond the
real viewport while `body` remained `overflow: hidden`.
- In the short viewport case, the browser only exposed a bottom sliver of the
G-code list area, which looked like “only one visible line with lots of blank
space above”.
4. Implemented a responsive layout fix in
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/styles/gmoccapy.css`.
- Removed the old hard `1180px / 640px` min-size behavior.
- Made the main shell columns responsive.
- Added a constrained `#app` viewport container.
- Added compact layout rules for shorter heights.
- Added an extra compact mode for very short heights (`max-height: 420px`) that:
- prioritizes the G-code panel height,
- hides `info-tabs`, `override`, `spindle-coolant`, and `mdi-panel`,
- reduces chrome height so the list can show multiple rows.
5. Validated after the fix.
- Rebuilt the site: `npm run build`
- Re-tested at `848x331`.
- Post-fix measured result:
- shell height = `331`
- G-code panel height = `177`
- G-code list height = `93`
- visible G-code rows = `4`
- Confirmed compact-mode hidden panels:
- `mdiVisible = none`
- `infoVisible = none`
6. Regression check.
- Ran `bash web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/browser/verify_gmoccapy_dist_browser.sh`
- Result: `gmoccapy_dist_smoke=ok`
Files modified by this execution:
```text
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/styles/gmoccapy.css
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md
```
## 2026-06-22 23:40:12 EDT manual short-viewport browser test and screenshots
User request: execute a test and capture screenshots.
Process summary:
1. Rebuilt the static site package.
- Ran `npm run build` in `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app`
- Result: `gmoccapy_static_build=ok`
2. Used the running local dist server at `http://127.0.0.1:4173/`.
3. Ran a manual browser test with Puppeteer at a short viewport.
- Viewport: `848x331`
- Program selected:
`configs/sim/axis/vismach/5axis/table-rotary-tilting/demos/impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`
4. Measured the rendered G-code panel.
- `visibleGcodeRows = 21`
- Confirmed the first visible lines include the expected impeller header and
program body rows.
5. Saved artifacts.
- Full-page screenshot:
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/manual-short-viewport/impeller-short-viewport-2026-06-22.png`
- G-code panel screenshot:
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/manual-short-viewport/impeller-short-viewport-gcode-2026-06-22.png`
- Metrics JSON:
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/manual-short-viewport/impeller-short-viewport-2026-06-22.json`
6. Visually inspected the cropped G-code screenshot.
- Verified the panel is nonblank and shows multiple visible rows, with line
numbers and impeller program content.
Files generated by this execution:
```text
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/manual-short-viewport/impeller-short-viewport-2026-06-22.png
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/manual-short-viewport/impeller-short-viewport-gcode-2026-06-22.png
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/manual-short-viewport/impeller-short-viewport-2026-06-22.json
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md
```
## 2026-06-22 23:55:45 EDT deploy current dist to cloud site 82.156.24.101:8092
User request: publish the current version to the cloud website.
Process summary:
1. Read deployment context from `git.txt` and prior deployment notes in this log.
- Confirmed cloud site target: `https://82.156.24.101:8092/`
- Confirmed prior nginx deployment root: `/var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim`
2. Rebuilt the static application before publish.
- Ran `npm run build` in `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app`
- Result: `gmoccapy_static_build=ok`
3. Packaged the current build output.
- Created:
`/tmp/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-8092.tar.gz`
4. Confirmed remote access details.
- SSH target: `ubuntu@82.156.24.101`
- `scp` and `ssh` available locally.
- `paramiko` available locally and used for reliable remote execution.
5. Uploaded and deployed with explicit remote replacement.
- Uploaded tarball to:
`/tmp/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-8092.tar.gz`
- Extracted to a timestamped remote staging directory.
- Backed up the previous nginx root to:
`/var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim.bak.<timestamp>`
- Replaced `/var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim` with the new build contents.
- Set ownership to `www-data:www-data`.
- Ran `nginx -t` and reloaded nginx.
6. Verified remote HTTPS response after deployment.
- Remote local check returned:
`HTTP/2 200`
- Public check:
`curl -k -I https://82.156.24.101:8092/`
returned `HTTP/2 200`
7. Verified the deployed site contains the new responsive compact layout.
- Fetched remote CSS from:
`https://82.156.24.101:8092/src/styles/gmoccapy.css`
- Confirmed presence of:
- `#app` viewport constraint
- `@media (max-height: 420px)`
- compact shell rows
8. Ran a cloud browser validation against the public URL.
- Viewport: `848x331`
- Program:
`configs/sim/axis/vismach/5axis/table-rotary-tilting/demos/impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`
- Result:
`cloud_short_viewport_visible_rows=21`
9. Saved cloud verification artifacts.
- Full-page screenshot:
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/cloud-short-viewport/cloud-impeller-short-viewport-2026-06-22.png`
- G-code panel screenshot:
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/cloud-short-viewport/cloud-impeller-short-viewport-gcode-2026-06-22.png`
- Metrics JSON:
`qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/cloud-short-viewport/cloud-impeller-short-viewport-2026-06-22.json`
10. Cleaned up the temporary local askpass helper.
Files generated by this execution:
```text
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/cloud-short-viewport/cloud-impeller-short-viewport-2026-06-22.png
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/cloud-short-viewport/cloud-impeller-short-viewport-gcode-2026-06-22.png
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/cloud-short-viewport/cloud-impeller-short-viewport-2026-06-22.json
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md
```
## 2026-06-22 23:40:12 EDT compact DRO layout for 20+ visible gcode rows
User request: increase the visible G-code line count to at least 20 and compress
the axis display area (`X Y Z A/B C`) to make room.
Process summary:
1. Reviewed current DRO rendering and layout.
- Read `app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js` and `app/src/styles/gmoccapy.css`.
- Confirmed the full-size DRO panel and title/bottom chrome still consumed too
much height in very short viewports.
2. Tightened the ultra-short-height layout in
`web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/styles/gmoccapy.css`.
- Reduced title row height.
- Reduced top preview/DRO row height.
- Reduced bottom-controls row height.
- Reduced G-code header/source-row/progress overhead.
- Reduced G-code row font size and row height.
3. Compressed the axis display area.
- In `max-height: 420px` mode:
- converted the DRO panel to a single compact row,
- changed the six axes to a 6-column compact strip,
- hid `G54/Abs`, `DTG`, and `TCP` strip details,
- reduced axis/value font sizes.
4. Rebuilt and measured the same short viewport (`848x331`).
- Post-fix metrics:
- `gcodeHeight = 253`
- `listHeight = 206`
- `visibleRows = 21`
- `rowHeight = 10`
- `droHeight = 24`
- `titleHeight = 24`
- `bottomHeight = 28`
5. Regression check.
- Ran `bash web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/browser/verify_gmoccapy_dist_browser.sh`
- Result: `gmoccapy_dist_smoke=ok`
Files modified by this execution:
```text
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/styles/gmoccapy.css
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md
```
## 2026-06-22 G-code full list visibility and RUN usability fix
User request: after selecting a source program, the program list should show the
whole source program. If the line count is large, dynamic loading is acceptable.
Also RUN is not easy to use.
Process summary:
1. Inspected current G-code panel and RUN controls.
- `app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js`
- `app/src/styles/gmoccapy.css`
- `app/src/state/store.js`
- `app/src/state/linuxcnc-task-policy.js`
2. Found the main display issue.
- `.gcode-panel` CSS defined only four grid rows:
`32px minmax(0, 1fr) 20px 54px`
- The DOM actually renders five sections:
G-code header, LinuxCNC source selector row, program list, progress, MDI.
- This caused the source selector and program list to overlap/compress, making
the long source program appear as only a tiny visible row.
3. Fixed full source-program list visibility.
- Updated `.gcode-panel` to five rows:
`auto auto minmax(96px, 1fr) 20px 54px`
- Added `.linuxcnc-source-row` layout rules so the source selector/status no
longer consume the program list area.
- The source program list remains scrollable for large programs, so all lines
are available without rendering outside the panel.
4. Improved RUN usability.
- Added `RUN_READY` store action.
- Added `runReadySequence()` in `store.js`.
- The sequence loads a default G-code source when needed, initializes task/HAL,
powers on, homes all joints, switches to AUTO mode, and enables the profile TCP
kinematics type.
- Added a `Run Ready` bottom-control button before `Run`.
- Adjusted bottom-control layout to fit the additional control.
5. Preserved existing RUN semantics.
- RUN still uses `validateRunPreconditions`.
- The new `Run Ready` button prepares the machine instead of bypassing the
LinuxCNC-style gates.
6. Validation completed.
- `node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js`
- `node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js`
- `npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build`
- `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`
- `node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs`
7. Browser test result:
- `test_linuxcnc_source_run_status=PASS`
- JSON report:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json`
- DOCX report:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-23.docx`
8. Relevant PASS evidence:
- `RUN 采样数量`
- `每行执行高亮同步`
- `程序列表显示每行执行过程`
- `RUN feed 不是固定 3600 mm/min`
- `RUN feed 随实际 G-code F/G93 段变化`
- `RUN 使用 G93 inverse-time feed`
Execution timestamp:
- `2026-06-22 22:42:20 EDT`
Files modified or generated by this execution:
```text
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/styles/gmoccapy.css
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-23.docx
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/test-linuxcnc-source-run/*.png
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md
```
## 2026-06-22 HTTPS deploy to 82.156.24.101:8092
User request: publish the Web RTCP 5 Axis simulator by HTTPS to remote server
`82.156.24.101` on port `8092` using SSH user `ubuntu`.
Process summary:
1. Built the local static app.
- Command: `npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build`
- Result: `gmoccapy_static_build=ok`
- Build output: `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/dist`
2. Packaged the build output.
- Command: `tar -C web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/dist -czf /tmp/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-8092.tar.gz .`
- Package size: about `1.6M`
3. Uploaded the package to the remote host.
- Tooling: `scp` via interactive password handling.
- Remote path: `/tmp/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-8092.tar.gz`
4. Attempted to create a standalone systemd HTTPS Node service.
- Service name: `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-8092.service`
- Initial service failed because port `8092` was already occupied.
5. Diagnosed port ownership.
- `ss -ltnp 'sport = :8092'` showed nginx already listening on `8092`.
- `curl -k -I https://127.0.0.1:8092/` already returned HTTP 200 from nginx.
6. Removed the failed standalone systemd service.
- Disabled/stopped `web-rtcp-5axis-sim-8092.service`.
- Removed `/etc/systemd/system/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-8092.service`.
- Reloaded systemd daemon.
7. Inspected existing nginx HTTPS configuration.
- Active config: `/etc/nginx/sites-available/web-rtcp-5axis-sim`
- HTTPS listener:
- `listen 8092 ssl http2`
- `listen [::]:8092 ssl http2`
- Root: `/var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim`
- Certificate paths:
- `/etc/letsencrypt/live/82.156.24.101/fullchain.pem`
- `/etc/letsencrypt/live/82.156.24.101/privkey.pem`
8. Deployed this build through the existing nginx HTTPS site.
- Extracted package to a staging directory.
- Backed up previous web root:
- `/var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim.bak.20260623101928`
- Replaced `/var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim` with the new static build.
- Set ownership to `www-data:www-data`.
- Ran `nginx -t`.
- Reloaded nginx.
9. Verified HTTPS access.
- Local remote check: `curl -k -I https://127.0.0.1:8092/` returned `HTTP/2 200`.
- Public check: `curl -k -I https://82.156.24.101:8092/` returned `HTTP/2 200`.
Execution timestamp:
- `2026-06-22 22:19:39 EDT`
Published URL:
```text
https://82.156.24.101:8092/
```
Files modified or generated by this execution:
```text
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/dist/**
/tmp/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-8092.tar.gz
remote:/tmp/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-8092.tar.gz
remote:/var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim/**
remote:/var/www/web-rtcp-5axis-sim.bak.20260623101928/**
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md
```
## 2026-06-22 realtime current G-code line display
User request: program realtime display of the currently executing G-code line number.
Process summary:
1. Inspected the existing UI and state flow.
- Checked `app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js` for titlebar, G-code header, and current-line display.
- Confirmed runtime line source is already available through `state.programRuntimeFeedback.line`
during task/HAL RUN, with `state.activeLine` as fallback.
2. Implemented a dedicated realtime current-line indicator.
- Added `currentGcodeExecutionLine(state)` in `gmoccapy-shell.js`.
- Added `currentGcodeLineSource(state)` in `gmoccapy-shell.js`.
- Added a titlebar element:
- class: `current-line-indicator`
- data attribute: `data-current-gcode-line`
- source attribute: `data-current-gcode-source`
- Updated the G-code header to show `Executing line <line>` and expose the same
`data-current-gcode-line` value.
3. Styled the realtime indicator.
- Updated `app/src/styles/gmoccapy.css`.
- Added compact, stable sizing for the titlebar realtime line display.
4. Validation completed.
- `node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js`
- `node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js`
- `npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build`
- `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`
- `node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs`
5. Browser test result:
- `test_linuxcnc_source_run_status=PASS`
- Realtime current-line evidence remained synchronized:
- `每行执行高亮同步`: PASS
- `程序列表显示每行执行过程`: PASS
Execution timestamp:
- `2026-06-22 22:09:20 EDT`
Files modified or generated by this execution:
```text
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/styles/gmoccapy.css
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-23.docx
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/test-linuxcnc-source-run/*.png
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md
```
## 2026-06-22 test_linuxcnc_source RUN completion
User request: continue completing RUN execution using files under
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/working_run/test_linuxcnc_source`,
execute actual G-code lines with actual feed, keep each axis data correct,
and show each line's execution process in the program list.
Process summary:
1. Inspected workspace rules and project structure.
- Confirmed `AGENTS.md` requires appending process logs to this file.
- Confirmed test source files:
- `working_run/test_linuxcnc_source/xyzac-trt.ini`
- `working_run/test_linuxcnc_source/impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`
2. Reviewed existing RUN/task-HAL flow.
- Read `app/src/state/store.js`, `app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-task-hal-runtime.js`,
`app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js`, and `app/src/styles/gmoccapy.css`.
- Confirmed task/HAL already drives runtime feedback from the loaded motion plan,
including active line, axis pose, task/servo cycles, and current feed velocity.
3. Implemented per-line execution state.
- Added `programLineExecution` in `app/src/state/store.js`.
- Updated interpreter init, playback fallback, reload/load reset paths, and
task/HAL status application to record per-line status, feed, XYZABC axis pose,
task cycle, servo cycle, sample index, and source mode.
4. Updated the program list UI.
- Updated `app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js` so each G-code row shows execution
process text such as status, feed, XYZAC values, and task/servo cycle.
- Updated `app/src/styles/gmoccapy.css` for running/done/pending line display.
5. Ensured the browser test actually uses the requested test source directory.
- Added `sourceTextOverrides` support in `app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-machine-file-staging.js`.
- Updated `qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs`
to stage `xyzac-trt.ini` and override the selected impeller G-code with the
text from `working_run/test_linuxcnc_source/impeller-7bl-xyzac.ngc`.
- Added checks that loaded source bytes match the test source file.
6. Added browser-test evidence for program-list execution process.
- Captured active-row execution text from the DOM.
- Added a PASS/FAIL check named `程序列表显示每行执行过程`.
7. Validation completed.
- `node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-machine-file-staging.js`
- `node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js`
- `node --check web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js`
- `node --check qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs`
- `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_impeller_feed_task_hal_run.mjs`
- `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_run_feedback_loop.mjs`
- `node web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/tests/node/verify_machine_file_staging.mjs`
- `npm --prefix web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app run build`
- `node qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs`
8. Browser test result:
- `test_linuxcnc_source_run_status=PASS`
- JSON report:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json`
- DOCX report:
`/home/meswork/cnc_wams/qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-23.docx`
9. Key PASS evidence from the generated report:
- `test_linuxcnc_source G-code hash matches loaded source`
- `刀具路径使用完整 canonical motion 点`
- `每行执行高亮同步`
- `程序列表显示每行执行过程`
- `实时轴值来自 task/HAL feedback`
- `RUN feed 不是固定 3600 mm/min`
- `RUN feed 随实际 G-code F/G93 段变化`
- `RUN 使用 G93 inverse-time feed`
- `task/HAL cycle 推进`
Execution timestamp:
- `2026-06-22 22:00:22 EDT`
Files modified or generated by this execution:
```text
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/capture-test-linuxcnc-source-run.mjs
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report.json
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/output/test-linuxcnc-source-run-report-2026-06-23.docx
qa/web-rtcp-5axis-site-test/screenshots/test-linuxcnc-source-run/*.png
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/runtime/linuxcnc-machine-file-staging.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/state/store.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/styles/gmoccapy.css
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/app/src/ui/gmoccapy-shell.js
web-rtcp-5axis-sim-plan/gptlog-process/gpdlog.md
```
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink