From 1bee73bf8e19e8a3626a3f2544d4716cf730a03e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: seven Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2026 11:35:55 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] v1: full rebuild as Paprika (13 pages from build note v2) --- v1/about.html | 123 +++++ v1/attorneys.html | 318 ------------- v1/disclaimer.html | 132 ++++++ v1/faq.html | 202 +++++++++ v1/index.html | 1041 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- v1/judging.html | 467 ++++++++++--------- v1/login.html | 352 --------------- v1/petitions.html | 511 --------------------- v1/press.html | 636 +++++++++++++++++--------- v1/privacy.html | 130 ++++++ v1/resources.html | 226 ++++++++++ v1/scholarly.html | 244 ++++++++++ v1/services.html | 479 +++++++++++--------- v1/start-here.html | 390 ++++++++++++++++ v1/styles.css | 520 ++++++++++----------- v1/terms.html | 138 ++++++ v1/why-paprika.html | 283 ++++++++++++ 17 files changed, 3697 insertions(+), 2495 deletions(-) create mode 100644 v1/about.html delete mode 100644 v1/attorneys.html create mode 100644 v1/disclaimer.html create mode 100644 v1/faq.html delete mode 100644 v1/login.html delete mode 100644 v1/petitions.html create mode 100644 v1/privacy.html create mode 100644 v1/resources.html create mode 100644 v1/scholarly.html create mode 100644 v1/start-here.html create mode 100644 v1/terms.html create mode 100644 v1/why-paprika.html diff --git a/v1/about.html b/v1/about.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d330d5d --- /dev/null +++ b/v1/about.html @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ + + + + + +About — Paprika + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
About
+

About Paprika.

+
+
+ +
+
+
+

Paprika exists because the most consequential O-1 evidence — press, judging, and authorship — is also the easiest to get wrong. Generic PR firms chase visibility. Paprika is built to chase evidence value, with attorney-caliber judgment.

+ +

What we do

+

We coordinate press placements, judging opportunities, and scholarly article authorship for high-achieving professionals — founders, researchers, executives, creators — building credible public recognition designed to support their future immigration strategy. Every opportunity is evaluated through an attorney-level lens before we recommend it.

+ +

What we are not

+

Paprika is not a law firm. We do not provide immigration legal advice or representation. We do not file O-1 petitions or serve as agent petitioners. When clients need petition representation, we connect them with experienced immigration counsel — but that is a referral, not a service Paprika delivers.

+ +

Why now

+

O-1 evidence should not be built in a panic. The strongest profiles look organic, with press, judging, and authorship accumulated over months — not packed into the weeks right before filing. Paprika gives candidates a way to build that record early, with judgment about which placements actually matter.

+ +

Who we serve

+

Founders, researchers, executives, creators, and global talent preparing for O-1, EB-1A, or long-term public recognition. We are selective about engagements — we turn down clients whose profiles aren't yet a fit, and we turn down placements that won't serve a client's case.

+ +

The standard

+

Our review framework is developed by attorneys with Ivy League legal training and Vault 10 BigLaw experience — direct experience evaluating immigration-related evidence and professional credentials. See Our Standard for the credential floor.

+
+
+
+ +
+
+
+

Start with your profile.

+

Share your LinkedIn or CV. We'll tell you what evidence path makes sense for you.

+ Send Us Your Profile +
+
+
+ + + + + diff --git a/v1/attorneys.html b/v1/attorneys.html deleted file mode 100644 index 698758c..0000000 --- a/v1/attorneys.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,318 +0,0 @@ - - - - - -Attorney Network — Abigail - - - - - - - - - - -
-
-
The Attorney Network
-

The same credentials Fortune 500 companies retain.
Without the Fortune 500 invoice.

-

When you elect attorney review, your case is signed off by an Ivy / BigLaw-trained immigration attorney engaged through Abigail Legal Services, P.C. — not a scattered network of solo practitioners.

-
-
- -
-
-
-

The credential floor — every attorney we engage clears it.

-

A single, verifiable standard. No exceptions, no two-tier sourcing, no offshored review.

-
- -
-
-
STANDARD 01
-

Top-tier JD

-

Columbia, Stanford, Yale, Harvard, NYU, Chicago, Penn, Berkeley — or an equivalent comparably-ranked law program.

-
-
-
STANDARD 02
-

BigLaw training

-

At least three years at an AmLaw 100 firm (Kirkland, Latham, Cravath, Skadden, Wachtell, S&C, etc.) before joining the network.

-
-
-
STANDARD 03
-

Immigration depth

-

Substantive employment-immigration experience: 50+ approved O-1A / EB-1 / H-1B petitions or equivalent in-house immigration leadership.

-
-
-
STANDARD 04
-

Active US bar

-

Bar admission in good standing in a US jurisdiction. Malpractice insurance carried through Abigail Legal Services, P.C.

-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-

How the roles work.

-

Every reviewed case has a named attorney of record. Most cases are handled by a single senior attorney; complex matters add a partner.

-
- -
-
-
Lead Reviewing Attorney
-

The attorney on your case.

-

Reviews the AI-prepared package end-to-end, annotates and revises where needed, signs the petition, and serves as your point of contact through filing and any post-filing actions in the Lifecycle tier.

-
-
TrainingTop-tier JD · BigLaw
-
Experience5–15 years immigration
-
Caseload cap≤ 25 active matters
-
BarActive US jurisdiction
-
-
- -
-
Supervising Partner
-

For complex strategy decisions.

-

Pulled in for borderline qualification calls, novel RFE arguments, or cases involving multiple parallel filings. Partners are former senior immigration leads at AmLaw 100 firms or in-house counsel at large multinationals.

-
-
TrainingTop-tier JD · BigLaw partner track
-
Experience12+ years immigration
-
Engaged whenComplex / borderline cases
-
BarActive, multiple jurisdictions
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-

How we vet attorneys.

-

A four-stage process. Every reviewing attorney goes through it. We turn away most candidates.

-
-
-
-
1
-

Credential audit

-

Bar standing, education, firm history, and malpractice record verified independently.

-
-
-
2
-

Sample review

-

Candidates review a representative test petition. Quality of annotation, precision of feedback, and legal sharpness are scored.

-
-
-
3
-

Working trial

-

Three live cases under partner supervision. We watch for turnaround discipline and accuracy, not just credentials on paper.

-
-
-
4
-

Continuous review

-

Every client engagement is rated. Anyone who slips below the bar is rotated out, not coached.

-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-

You'll know your attorney's name and credentials before they touch your case.

-

When attorney review is elected, you're matched to a specific named attorney and receive their full credentialed bio before they begin work.

-
- See attorney-reviewed tier - All services -
-
-
-
- - - - - - - diff --git a/v1/disclaimer.html b/v1/disclaimer.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3579230 --- /dev/null +++ b/v1/disclaimer.html @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ + + + + + +Disclaimer — Paprika + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Legal
+

Full Disclaimer.

+
+
+ +
+
+
+

Last updated: 2026

+ +
+

Paprika is a media, visibility, and evidence-support company. Paprika is not a law firm and does not provide immigration legal advice, legal representation, or visa filing services. References to "attorney-curated" mean that evidence-building services are reviewed for general immigration-evidence relevance by licensed legal professionals or legally trained reviewers. Use of Paprika's services does not create an attorney-client relationship. O-1 eligibility, petition strategy, petitioner and agent matters, and filing decisions should be reviewed by independent immigration counsel. No press, judging, authorship, or visibility service can guarantee visa approval or USCIS acceptance of any evidence.

+
+ +

Not a law firm

+

Paprika is not a law firm. Paprika does not have attorneys representing clients in immigration matters through Paprika. Paprika team members and reviewers do not act as your immigration counsel through Paprika's services.

+ +

No legal advice

+

Nothing on this website, in our written materials, or in our service communications constitutes legal advice. We make no representations or warranties about O-1 eligibility, USCIS evidentiary weight, petition strategy, agent filing structures, or any other legal question. Even where our materials touch on legal concepts (e.g., O-1 criteria, USCIS evidentiary standards), these are described for educational and service-coordination purposes, not as legal counsel.

+ +

No attorney-client relationship

+

Submitting an intake form, scheduling an introductory call, or engaging Paprika for services does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Paprika, between you and any Paprika team member, or between you and any reviewer affiliated with Paprika. Communications with Paprika are not protected by attorney-client privilege through Paprika.

+ +

Independent counsel for legal matters

+

Any legal question about your immigration status, petition strategy, agent filing, eligibility, or USCIS proceedings should be directed to a licensed immigration attorney with whom you have a direct attorney-client relationship. Paprika can refer you to experienced immigration counsel upon request — this referral is not legal representation by Paprika.

+ +

No outcome guarantees

+

Paprika does not guarantee:

+

(a) approval of any visa petition, including O-1A, O-1B, EB-1A, or EB-2 NIW;
+ (b) USCIS acceptance, weight, or evaluation of any evidence Paprika helps coordinate;
+ (c) editorial outcomes beyond specific deliverables expressly described in a signed engagement letter;
+ (d) timeline outcomes for press, judging, or authorship placements outside of what is committed in the engagement letter.

+ +

Placement guarantee (limited)

+

Where Paprika expressly offers a placement-delivery guarantee for a specific engagement, that guarantee is limited to refunding the unpublished placement fee. It does not extend to immigration outcomes, legal eligibility, or USCIS acceptance of the placement as evidence.

+ +

Editorial integrity policy

+

Paprika does not purchase editorial placements. Paprika does not represent contributor or sponsored content as editorial coverage. Paprika does not place ghost-authored articles in venues that solicit payment for bylines. These boundaries protect client cases — paid or sponsored coverage carries minimal evidentiary weight and may actively harm a petition.

+ +

Forward-looking statements

+

Statements about timelines, outcomes, or attorney-evaluation likelihood are educated estimates, not commitments. Actual outcomes depend on factors outside Paprika's control, including the full case record, the specific USCIS officer, and policy changes.

+
+
+
+ + + + + diff --git a/v1/faq.html b/v1/faq.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..17947d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/v1/faq.html @@ -0,0 +1,202 @@ + + + + + +FAQ — Paprika + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
FAQ
+

Common questions.

+

Direct answers about what Paprika is, what we don't do, and how the engagement works.

+
+
+ +
+
+
+ +
+ +
No. Paprika is a media, visibility, and evidence-building company. We do not provide immigration legal advice or representation. Legal advice and filing should be handled by licensed immigration counsel.
+
+ +
+ +
It means every press, judging, and scholarly article opportunity is reviewed through an attorney-caliber lens — evaluating credibility, field-fit, timing, and documentation before we recommend or coordinate anything. It does not mean Paprika is providing legal advice or guaranteeing USCIS acceptance.
+
+ +
+ +
The earlier the better. Evidence built over time looks more credible than a cluster of placements right before filing. That said, Paprika can work with any timeline — we will prioritize the most practical evidence-building steps based on when you are.
+
+ +
+ +
Yes. Paprika is especially useful before the formal O-1 process begins. You can start building press, judging, and authorship early, then give your future attorney stronger material to work with.
+
+ +
+ +
Yes. Many clients already have immigration counsel. Paprika provides press, judging, authorship, and documentation support that your attorney can review and use as appropriate.
+
+ +
+ +
No. No PR, press, judging, or authorship service can guarantee a visa outcome. Paprika guarantees specific placement deliverables where expressly stated. Visa results depend on the full case and USCIS review.
+
+ +
+ +
Yes. Paprika can connect you with experienced immigration counsel for O-1 petitions, agent filing structures, and legal representation. This is a referral, not a legal service provided by Paprika.
+
+ +
+ +
Yes, selectively. Paprika's main focus is O-1 evidence and press, but the same strategy can support founders and companies expanding into the U.S. market. General PR is secondary to our O-1 evidence work.
+
+ +
+ +
Packages start at $1,999+. Final pricing depends on outlet level, timeline, field, number of placements, and documentation needs. Send us your profile and we will recommend what makes sense for your goals and budget.
+
+ +
+
+
+ +
+
+
+

Still have a question?

+

Send it via the intake form. The team replies within 2 business days.

+ Ask a Question +
+
+
+ + + + + + + diff --git a/v1/index.html b/v1/index.html index 54c7f08..8657455 100644 --- a/v1/index.html +++ b/v1/index.html @@ -3,236 +3,395 @@ -Abigail — AI-native O-1 & EB-1 representation - +Paprika — Attorney-Curated Press & Evidence for O-1 Talent + - + @@ -240,237 +399,327 @@ -
+ +
-

Attorney-led O-1 & EB-1.
Powered by AI.

-

Abigail combines an AI drafting engine with Ivy / BigLaw-trained attorneys. Flat fees, 5-business-day prep, no retainers — for extraordinary-ability cases.

+

O-1 evidence should not be built in a panic.

+

Paprika helps extraordinary founders, researchers, executives, and creators build credible public recognition early — through attorney-curated press, judging, scholarly articles, and evidence-conscious visibility strategy.

- Sign up - See services -
-
- Flat fees.   No retainers.   Ivy / BigLaw attorneys. + Send Us Your Profile + Ask a Question
+

Share your LinkedIn or CV. We review your background and tell you what evidence path makes sense for your profile and timeline — no commitment required.

+
The only thing you cannot buy later is time.
+ +
+
+ Built for founders, researchers, executives, creators, and global talent preparing for O-1, EB-1A, or long-term public recognition. +
+
+ +
-
-

What we do.

-

Three coordinated layers — filing, evidence, lifecycle — under one engagement.

-
- -
-
-
PILLAR 01
-

Filing

-

AI builds the petition narrative, evidence map, support letter frameworks, and forms. An Ivy / BigLaw-trained attorney reviews, annotates, and signs. 5-business-day turnaround.

- See filing tiers → -
-
-
PILLAR 02
-

Evidence

-

Optional services that strengthen the criteria where applicants commonly fall short — press placement for Criterion 3 and peer-review intros for Criterion 4.

- See evidence services → -
-
-
PILLAR 03
-

Lifecycle

-

Continuous attorney representation from intake to filing to RFE response to extension. One named attorney across the entire arc, not a rotating cast.

- Meet the network → -
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
5 days
-
Target prep, intake to attorney-ready
-
-
-
Ivy / BigLaw
-
The credential floor for every reviewing attorney
-
-
-
Flat fees
-
No retainers, no hourly billing, no scope creep
-
-
-
150+
-
Founder's in-house immigration matters managed
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-

The evidence layer.

-

Most O-1A and EB-1A denials trace to two criteria: published material and judging. We help close the gap before filing.

-
- -
- -
Criterion 3
-

Press & Media Support

-

Editorial outreach to publications that qualify for USCIS — no paid placements, no fake bylines.

- Learn more → - - -
Criterion 4
-

Peer-Review Intros

-

Matched introductions to journals, conferences, and grant panels actively recruiting reviewers in your field.

- Learn more → - - -
Resource
-

Petition Anatomy

-

Browse every petition type we cover — what USCIS wants, where filings go wrong, and our exhibit-mapping playbook.

- Browse petitions → - -
-
-
- -
-
-
+
-

From intake to filing-ready in five business days.

-

Most attorney-only firms quote 4–6 weeks. Even AI-assisted firms quote 2 weeks. Abigail's AI does the work in parallel with evidence collection — your package is ready when your last document arrives.

- See how it works +

The one thing you cannot buy later is time.

+

Press, judging, and scholarly articles are strongest when they look like part of a real professional trajectory. If every placement and publication appears in the weeks right before filing, the profile can feel rushed or manufactured. USCIS reviewers are trained to evaluate organic recognition over time. Paprika helps you build a natural cadence before you are under filing pressure — regardless of your specific timeline.

+ Start Here
-
    -
  • - 01 -
    Intake & document uploadAI classifies, extracts, and runs consistency checks the moment you upload.
    -
    • -
  • - 02 -
    AI drafts your packagePetition narrative, support letter frameworks, evidence map, cover letter — all grounded in your facts.
    -
    • -
  • - 03 -
    Attorney reviews & signs3–5 business-day turnaround. Engagement via Abigail Legal Services, P.C.
    -
    • -
  • - 04 -
    Filed & trackedUSCIS receipt tracked. Alerts proactive. RFE response capability built in.
    -
    • +
      +
    • Build recognition before you need to prove it
      • +
    • Create a more natural publication and judging timeline
      • +
    • Avoid last-minute evidence panic
      • +
    • Give your future immigration attorney stronger material to work with
      • +
    • Build a public record that helps your career regardless of immigration outcome
      • +
    • Start with one article, one judging opportunity, or a full profile review
+ +
+
+
+

Three core services.

+

Coordinated by attorneys. Designed for evidence value, not vanity.

+
+
+ +
SERVICE · 01
+

Press

+

Feature articles, expert commentary, founder profiles, and media coverage that builds credible public recognition around your work.

+ + +
SERVICE · 02
+

Judging

+

Panels, competitions, peer review, and evaluation roles that show your field trusts your expertise to judge theirs.

+ + +
SERVICE · 03
+

Scholarly Articles

+

Scholarly, industry, and expert-authored articles that establish professional authority and field-specific thought leadership.

+ +
+
+
+ +
-
-

Ready when you are.

-

Sign up to be matched with an attorney and start your filing. Or read the services overview first.

-
- Sign up - See services +
+

Not all press helps. Not all judging counts.

+

Generic PR focuses on visibility. Paprika focuses on evidence value. Before recommending any placement or opportunity, we evaluate it against the standards that matter for your specific profile and your future immigration review.

+
+
+

The questions we ask before recommending anything

+
    +
  1. Is the article actually about you — not just your company or product?
    2. +
  2. Does it connect to your specific professional field and O-1 criteria?
    3. +
  3. Does the outlet appear credible, independent, and documentable to USCIS standards?
    4. +
  4. Does the timing make sense for a natural, organic-looking public profile?
    5. +
  5. Does the judging role involve genuinely evaluating others' work — or is it ceremonial?
    6. +
  6. Does the authorship reflect real expertise, or does it read as promotional content?
    7. +
  7. Can your future attorney use this cleanly in an evidence package?
    8. +
  8. Does it complement your other existing criteria?
    9. +
+
These are not questions that generic PR firms ask. They require attorney-level judgment to answer correctly for a specific person's case.
+
+ +
+
+ + +
+
+
+

Press that helps your O-1 is not the same as press that just mentions you.

+

USCIS reviewers are trained to identify the difference between genuine editorial recognition and paid or contributor content. The distinction is not always obvious from the publication name alone — it lives in how the article is labeled, who authored it, and whether the editorial team was actually involved.

+
+ +
+
+
Major Tech Publication
+
CONTRIBUTOR CONTENT BY [Third Party]
+
+
How AI Is Reshaping the Future of Work
+
Published · Contributor
+
+ What the label signals: + The editorial team did not select this. A third party wrote or paid for it. USCIS will likely treat this as advertising, not editorial recognition. +
+
+
+
+
National Daily
+
EDITORIAL STAFF WERE NOT INVOLVED WITH THIS CONTENT
+
+
10 Trends Changing the Industry in 2026
+
Published · Branded content
+
+ What the label signals: + Same outlet name, same domain — but this is paid placement. The editorial team explicitly disclaims involvement. Essentially an advertisement. +
+
+
+
+ +
An article on the exact same outlet can be extremely strong evidence — or essentially useless evidence — depending entirely on how it was produced and labeled.
+
The outlet name is not the evidence. The editorial independence is.
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+

How it works.

+

Five steps from profile review to a USCIS-ready evidence package.

+
+
+
+
1
+

Send us your profile — LinkedIn, CV, or a short description of your work and goals.

+
+
+
2
+

Receive a profile assessment and recommended evidence path specific to your background.

+
+
+
3
+

Choose your services: press, judging, scholarly articles, full evidence strategy, or counsel referral.

+
+
+
4
+

We source, vet, coordinate, and document each opportunity.

+
+
+
5
+

Receive a USCIS-ready evidence package organized for attorney review.

+ +
+
+
+
+

Packages start at $1,999+

+

Final pricing depends on outlet level, timeline, field, and evidence goals. Custom packages available. We will recommend what makes sense after reviewing your background and timeline.

+
+
+ See Services +
+
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+

Attorney-caliber review for every opportunity.

+

Our attorneys bring Ivy League legal training and Vault 10 BigLaw experience to every evidence review — the same judgment applied to high-stakes legal work, now applied to your O-1 profile. That means evaluating not just whether a placement is obtainable, but whether it will actually serve your case.

+
+ Ivy League legal training + Vault 10 BigLaw experience + Evidence-conscious review +
+ See Why Paprika +
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+
+

Need immigration counsel or an O-1 agent petitioner?

+

Building strong evidence is the first step. When you're ready to file — or if you have legal questions about O-1 eligibility, petition strategy, or agent filing — Paprika can connect you with experienced immigration attorneys who handle O-1 petitions and agent structures.

+
+ Talk to Our Team +
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+

General PR for founders and companies. The same visibility strategy that helps O-1 talent can also support founders and companies expanding into the U.S. market — for investors, customers, partners, and long-term positioning.

+ Learn more about Founder Visibility → +
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+

Questions, briefly.

+

Full answers on the FAQ page.

+
+
+
+

Is Paprika a law firm?

+

No. Paprika is a media and evidence-building company. We do not provide immigration legal advice.

+
+
+

Does Paprika guarantee visa approval?

+

No. We guarantee specific placement deliverables where stated. Visa outcomes depend on the full case.

+
+
+

When should I start?

+

The earlier the better. Evidence built over time looks more credible than a cluster of placements right before filing.

+
+
+

Can I use Paprika before hiring an attorney?

+

Yes. Paprika is especially useful before the formal O-1 process begins.

+
+
+

Can I use Paprika if I already have an attorney?

+

Yes. Many clients already have immigration counsel.

+
+
+

How does pricing work?

+

Packages start at $1,999+. Final pricing depends on outlet level, timeline, field, and evidence goals.

+
+
+
+
+ + +
+
+

Your work may already be extraordinary. Your public record should show it.

+

Send us your profile. We'll tell you whether Paprika can help and what evidence-building path makes sense for your timeline and goals.

+
+ Send Us Your Profile + Ask a Question +
+
+
+ +
-
Abigail.
-
Attorney-led, AI-powered
+
Paprika
+
Attorney-Curated Press & Evidence for O-1 Talent.
-
-
-
Services
- - - - -
-
-
Resources
- - - - -
-
-
Account
- - - - -
+
+

Services

+ Press + Judging + Scholarly Articles + Packages +
+
+

About

+ Why Paprika + Resources + FAQ + About +
+
+

Legal

+ Terms of Service + Privacy + Disclaimer + Start Here
- Abigail Technologies, Inc. operates an AI-native immigration platform and does not provide legal services. Legal services, where elected, are provided by Abigail Legal Services, P.C. through a separate engagement letter. Evidence-building services are non-legal professional services and do not guarantee specific outcomes. Use of the platform does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. + Paprika is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or immigration representation. Use of our services does not create an attorney-client relationship.
- - diff --git a/v1/judging.html b/v1/judging.html index 91c67c8..2f0d5c0 100644 --- a/v1/judging.html +++ b/v1/judging.html @@ -3,100 +3,133 @@ -Peer-Review Intros — Abigail +Judging — Paprika + - + @@ -104,237 +137,191 @@ -
+ +
-
-
-
Peer-Review Introductions · O-1A Criterion 4
-

Build the judging evidence USCIS actually credits.

-

Many strong candidates miss Criterion 4 simply because no one ever invited them to review. Abigail introduces qualified applicants to journals, conferences, panels, and grant committees actively seeking reviewers in their field.

-
- Request matching - Read the guide -
-
-
-
- Criterion 4: Evidence of the alien's participation, either individually or on a panel, as a judge of the work of others in the same or an allied field of specialization for which classification is sought. - 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(o)(3)(iii)(B)(4) -
-
+
Judging
+

Attorney-Curated Judging
for O-1 Talent.

+

Evaluating the work of others in your field is one of the most valued — and most overlooked — O-1 evidence categories.

+

Being selected to judge means professionals and organizations in your field have recognized your expertise as sufficient to evaluate others' work. The roles that carry evidentiary weight are selective, field-relevant, properly documented, and clearly evaluative — not ceremonial or participation-based. Paprika identifies and coordinates judging opportunities that meet these standards.

+
+ Send Us Your Profile + See Packages
+
-

What counts as "judging."

-

USCIS reads Criterion 4 broadly — but only when the evidence is documented properly. Here's what we help match you to.

+

What counts as judging.

+

Roles that demonstrate professionals in your field trust your expertise to evaluate the work of others.

- -
-
-

Academic peer review

-

Refereeing manuscripts for peer-reviewed journals or conference proceedings.

-
    -
  • Journal manuscript reviews
    • -
  • Conference paper reviews (NeurIPS, ICML, ACL, CHI, etc.)
    • -
  • Special-issue editorial roles
    • -
+
+
+

Startup pitch competitions

+

Accelerator demo-day judging panels and pitch evaluation roles.

-
-

Conference & panel judging

-

Serving on selection committees, panels, or technical program committees.

-
    -
  • Conference program committees
    • -
  • Best-paper / best-poster panels
    • -
  • Industry track selection committees
    • -
+
+

Hackathon & innovation judging

+

Technical evaluation of submissions to competitive innovation events.

-
-

Competition & hackathon judging

-

Evaluating submissions to competitive events in your field.

-
    -
  • Hackathon technical judging
    • -
  • Startup competition panels
    • -
  • Industry awards programs
    • -
+
+

Industry award committees

+

Award evaluation committees in your professional field.

-
-

Grant & funding review

+
+

Academic & conference peer review

+

Refereeing manuscripts for journals, conferences, or field publications.

+
+
+

Grant review panels

Reviewing applications for grant programs, fellowships, or accelerators.

-
    -
  • NSF / NIH study sections (rare but powerful)
    • -
  • Foundation grant panels
    • -
  • Accelerator / fellowship selection
    • -
+
+
+

Professional program reviews

+

Serving on review boards for established professional development programs.

+
+
+

Startup investment committees

+

Investment committee participation evaluating funding decisions.

+
+
+

Research competition judging

+

Evaluating research projects, theses, or competitive scientific submissions.

+
-

How the matching service works.

-

A 60-day engagement. We do the outreach. You do the reviews. Documentation is automatic.

+

Judging competition network.

+

Examples from Paprika's judging network, tailored by field.

-
-
-
1
-

Profile intake

-

You share your field, publications, prior reviewing experience, availability, and target O-1A timeline.

-
-
-
2
-

Targeted outreach

-

We identify journals, conferences, and panels actively recruiting reviewers in your specialty — then make introductions.

-
-
-
3
-

You review

-

You accept invitations that fit your time and expertise. Decline anything that doesn't. Quality of review is on you.

-
-
-
4
-

Documentation

-

For each accepted review, Abigail collects the invitation letter and completion confirmation — formatted as O-1A exhibits.

+
+

Startup & Technology

+
+ Y Combinator Demo Day adjacentTechCrunch DisruptSXSW PitchWeb SummitSlushCollisionF.oundersStartup Grind GlobalMassChallengePlug and Play500 GlobalBerkeley SkyDeckAngelPadTechstarsFounder InstituteNewChip AcceleratorAdjacent
+ +
+

Sciences, Design, Arts & Research

+
+ Field-specific peer review panelsAcademic journal reviewConference TPCsDesign competition juriesArts award panelsResearch grant committeesProfessional program reviews +
+
+ +

Competition and judging placement is matched to your field, background, and timeline on intake.

+
-

Common questions.

+

USCIS-ready evidence package for judging.

+

Documentation built for attorney use and exhibit preparation.

-
-
- -
No. We can guarantee the outreach (a defined number of targeted introductions per engagement), but acceptance is at the discretion of the program. Most applicants in a fitting field receive 3–8 viable invitations over the 60-day engagement.
+
+
+

Verification letter on letterhead

+

From the competition or program organizer, confirming your selection, panel selectivity, and the scope of your evaluation role.

-
- -
No. Peer-review introductions are a non-legal professional service. Legal evaluation of how your accumulated evidence maps to O-1A criteria is a separate service provided by Abigail Legal Services, P.C. under separate engagement.
+
+

Panel agenda & bio listing

+

Official program documentation showing your name and judging role.

-
- -
Ideally 4–6 months before your target filing date. Most reviews take 4–8 weeks from invitation to completion documentation. Starting 60 days out is feasible but tight.
+
+

Judge selection documentation

+

How judges were selected and what criteria were used — the selectivity narrative.

-
- -
Even better. We focus on filling gaps — adding 2–4 more high-credibility reviews can move a borderline Criterion 4 into clearly-satisfied territory.
+
+

Competitive pool confirmation

+

Where applicable: confirmation that you were selected from a competitive pool of applicants based on field expertise.

-
- -
No. Evidence-building services are available standalone. But the documentation we produce is exhibit-ready for any attorney's package.
+
+

Organizer correspondence

+

Email and formal communication confirming your participation, preserved for the record.

+
+
+

Attorney-ready packet

+

A documentation packet organized for clean attorney review and direct exhibit use.

-
+ +
-

Get matched.

-

Tell us your field, your timeline, and the criterion you're trying to strengthen. We'll respond within one business day.

-
- Start with intake - See all services +

Add judging to your evidence plan.

+

Tell us your field and timeline. We'll match you to selective judging opportunities that carry real evidentiary weight.

+
+ - - diff --git a/v1/login.html b/v1/login.html deleted file mode 100644 index 9d84a11..0000000 --- a/v1/login.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,352 +0,0 @@ - - - - - -Log in — Abigail - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - diff --git a/v1/petitions.html b/v1/petitions.html deleted file mode 100644 index 4ea4f5f..0000000 --- a/v1/petitions.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,511 +0,0 @@ - - - - - -Petitions — Abigail - - - - - - - - - - -
-
-
Resources · Petitions
-

Every petition we cover, explained like a builder.

-

What the criteria actually require, what evidence USCIS credits, and where most filings go wrong. Browse by visa type or by your situation.

-
-
- -
-
-
- - - - - -
- -
- - -
-
O-1A
-

Extraordinary Ability

-

Science, business, education, athletics

-
-
Sponsorship
Employer or agent
-
Validity
Up to 3 years, renewable
-
Cap
No lottery
-
Family
O-3 dependents
-
-
-

What USCIS wants

-

Sustained acclaim, demonstrated by 3 of 8 evidentiary criteria. Most filings rest on awards, peer review, original contributions, salary, and press.

-

Where filings go wrong

-
    -
  • Weak Criterion 3 (press): brief quotes, not feature pieces
    • -
  • Missing Criterion 4 (judging): no documented peer review
    • -
  • "Critical employment" claim without role-specific evidence
    • -
-
- Read the O-1A guide → -
- - -
-
O-1B
-

Extraordinary Ability — Arts

-

Arts, motion pictures, television

-
-
Sponsorship
Employer or agent
-
Validity
Up to 3 years, renewable
-
Cap
No lottery
-
Family
O-3 dependents
-
-
-

What USCIS wants

-

Distinction in the arts (3 of 6 criteria), or extraordinary achievement in motion picture / TV (3 of 6 + lead roles).

-

Where filings go wrong

-
    -
  • Conflating "arts" criteria with motion picture / TV criteria
    • -
  • Evidence focused on personal artistic merit, missing distinction
    • -
-
- Read the O-1B guide → -
- - -
-
EB-1A
-

Extraordinary Ability — Green Card

-

Self-petition, no labor cert, no employer required

-
-
Sponsorship
Self
-
Validity
Permanent residence
-
Premium proc.
Available
-
Priority date
Often current
-
-
-

What USCIS wants

-

Sustained national or international acclaim, demonstrated by 3 of 10 criteria — plus a final-merits determination that the applicant is at the top of their field.

-

Where filings go wrong

-
    -
  • Treating it as "O-1A but harder" — the final-merits step is independent
    • -
  • Heavy criterion stack with weak narrative tying it together
    • -
-
- Read the EB-1A guide → -
- - -
-
EB-2 NIW
-

National Interest Waiver

-

Self-petition, advanced degree or exceptional ability

-
-
Sponsorship
Self
-
Validity
Permanent residence
-
Premium proc.
Available
-
Backlog (China/India)
2–6 years
-
-
-

What USCIS wants

-

The three-prong Dhanasar test: substantial merit and national importance · well-positioned to advance the endeavor · waiver of labor cert benefits the US.

-

Where filings go wrong

-
    -
  • Generic statements of "national importance" with no specifics
    • -
  • Prong-2 (well-positioned) under-evidenced for early-career applicants
    • -
-
- Read the NIW guide → -
- - -
-
H-1B
-

Specialty Occupation

-

The default work visa, subject to annual lottery

-
-
Sponsorship
Employer
-
Validity
Up to 6 years
-
Cap
85K annual lottery
-
Family
H-4 dependents
-
-
-

What USCIS wants

-

A specialty occupation (requires a specific bachelor's-level degree), the applicant's qualification for it, and a certified LCA.

-

Where filings go wrong

-
    -
  • Weak "specialty occupation" argument for ambiguous job titles
    • -
  • Job description doesn't tie to the required degree field
    • -
  • LCA wage tier mismatched to actual role seniority
    • -
-
- Read the H-1B guide → -
- - -
-
L-1A / L-1B
-

Intracompany Transferee

-

Manager / executive (L-1A) or specialized knowledge (L-1B)

-
-
Sponsorship
Employer
-
Validity
7 years (L-1A) / 5 (L-1B)
-
Cap
None
-
Family
L-2 (work auth)
-
-
-

What USCIS wants

-

One year of qualifying employment at a related foreign entity in the prior three years, transferring to a US office in the same managerial or specialized-knowledge role.

-

Where filings go wrong

-
    -
  • "Manager" claim without genuine subordinates or budget authority
    • -
  • "Specialized knowledge" defined too broadly to be credible
    • -
-
- Read the L-1 guide → -
- - -
-
EB-1B
-

Outstanding Researcher

-

For academic and industry researchers

-
-
Sponsorship
Employer
-
Validity
Permanent residence
-
Premium proc.
Available
-
Experience
3+ years required
-
-
-

What USCIS wants

-

International recognition for outstanding achievement in a specific academic field. 2 of 6 criteria, plus a permanent research position.

-

Where filings go wrong

-
    -
  • "Outstanding" claim relies on citation count alone — without field context
    • -
  • Recommender letters too generic to establish international recognition
    • -
-
- Read the EB-1B guide → -
- - -
-
TN
-

USMCA Professional

-

Canadian and Mexican citizens only

-
-
Sponsorship
Employer
-
Validity
3 years, indefinitely renewable
-
Cap
None
-
Adjudication
Often same-day (border)
-
-
-

What USCIS wants

-

Treaty-based work authorization in one of the listed USMCA professional occupations, with the degree credentials each occupation requires.

-

Where filings go wrong

-
    -
  • Trying to fit a non-listed occupation by analogy
    • -
  • "Management Consultant" use without sufficient justification
    • -
-
- Read the TN guide → -
- -
-
-
- -
-
-
-

The anatomy of any petition.

-

What every winning filing contains, regardless of visa type. Skip any of these and USCIS will notice.

-
- -
-
-
- 01 -

Form package

Properly completed USCIS forms (I-129, I-140, G-28 where applicable) with consistent dates and identifiers across every line.

-
-
- 02 -

Petition narrative

A structured argument tying the applicant's facts to each statutory criterion, with cross-references to exhibits.

-
-
- 03 -

Evidence exhibits

Tabbed, indexed supporting documents — degrees, awards, publications, contracts, media — each mapped to a specific criterion.

-
-
- 04 -

Recommendation letters

Specific, signed letters from credible experts in the field, addressing the applicant's particular contributions — not generic endorsements.

-
-
- 05 -

Cover letter

The roadmap. A clear summary of the petition, the legal standard, and where each piece of evidence lands.

-
-
- 06 -

Filing fees

Correct fee amounts (they change). Premium processing if elected. Wrong fees = rejection without review.

-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-

Not sure which petition fits?

-

The free AI screener analyzes all major visa types simultaneously and outputs candidate pathways with evidence gap analysis.

-
- Run the screener - Browse the library -
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
Abigail.
-
AI-native immigration platform
-
-
- -
-
Resources
- - - -
-
-
Legal
- - - -
-
-
-
-
- Content on this page is general informational summary and is not legal advice. Immigration law and USCIS practice change; verify specifics against current USCIS policy or consult a licensed attorney. Reading this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. -
-
-
- - - - - diff --git a/v1/press.html b/v1/press.html index f3c4fc9..c37affd 100644 --- a/v1/press.html +++ b/v1/press.html @@ -3,87 +3,250 @@ -Press & Media Support — Abigail +Press — Paprika + - + @@ -91,229 +254,256 @@ -
+ +
-
-
-
Press & Media Support · O-1A Criterion 3
-

Coverage that actually qualifies as evidence.

-

Press placements are the single most-misunderstood O-1A criterion. We help applicants secure media coverage in the publications USCIS recognizes — and avoid the wasted effort that doesn't count.

-
- Request a strategy call - Read the guide -
-
-
-
- Criterion 3: Published material in professional or major trade publications or major media, relating to the alien's work in the field for which classification is sought. - 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(o)(3)(iii)(B)(3) -
-
+
Press
+

Attorney-Curated Press
for O-1 Talent.

+

Build credible media recognition that reflects your professional expertise — not your company's product launch.

+

Published articles about you and your work are one of the most direct ways to document public recognition in your field. But not all press serves that purpose. Paprika sources, vets, and coordinates press opportunities designed with O-1 evidentiary value in mind — evaluating the outlet, the framing, the timing, and the editorial independence, with attorney-level judgment at every step.

+
+ Send Us Your Profile + See Packages
+
-

What actually counts.

-

USCIS looks at three things: the publication's stature, whether the article is about you (not just quoting you), and the field relevance.

+

What Paprika looks for.

+

Before recommending any placement, we evaluate your profile and the opportunity against the considerations that actually matter for immigration evidence.

- -
-
-

Major trade & industry publications

-

Profile or feature pieces in publications respected within your specialty.

-
    -
  • Industry trade press (TechCrunch for tech, Variety for film, etc.)
    • -
  • Specialty publications with broad circulation in your field
    • -
  • Recognized academic-adjacent outlets (Nature News, Quanta, MIT Tech Review)
    • -
-
-
-

Major general media

-

Coverage in publications with broad national or international reach.

-
    -
  • National newspapers and magazines
    • -
  • Major broadcast / streaming media segments
    • -
  • Established business or news outlets
    • -
-
-
-

Long-form digital media

-

Substantive coverage in respected digital outlets and podcasts with editorial standards.

-
    -
  • Editorial podcast features (not promotional)
    • -
  • YouTube channels with credentialed editorial process
    • -
  • Newsletter platforms with verified scale
    • -
-
-
-

What doesn't count

-

Common applicant mistakes that USCIS routinely rejects.

-
    -
  • Self-published blog posts or LinkedIn articles you wrote
    • -
  • Press releases distributed by your employer
    • -
  • Brief quotes in articles primarily about someone else
    • -
  • Sponsored content or pay-to-publish outlets
    • -
  • Coverage outside your professional field
    • -
-
+
+
    +
  1. Is the article about you personally — your expertise, your work, your recognition — not just your company?
    2. +
  2. Does the headline feature your name and connect to your field?
    3. +
  3. Is the content editorial — 500 to 1,000+ words of genuine coverage, not a paid feature or contributor post?
    4. +
  4. Does the outlet have real readership, editorial standards, and a clean track record?
    5. +
  5. Is there any "CONTRIBUTOR CONTENT," "SPONSORED," or "EDITORIAL STAFF NOT INVOLVED" disclosure that signals the article lacks independence?
    6. +
  6. Does the timing fit a natural, organic-looking trajectory rather than a sudden cluster before filing?
    7. +
  7. Does the coverage complement your other O-1 criteria?
    8. +
+
The outlet name is not the evidence. The editorial independence is.
+
-

How the engagement works.

-

A structured 90-day program. Editorial outreach, not paid placement. No guarantees, but a defined process.

+

What to avoid: Press that won't help your case.

+

Two of the most-cited outlets in visa press are major national publications. But both publish two very different types of content: genuine editorial features and contributor or sponsored content. The difference is visible in the label.

-
-
-
1
-

Story discovery

-

We work with you to identify the angles in your work that journalists will actually find newsworthy.

+
+
+
Major Tech Publication
+
EDITORIAL STAFF WERE NOT INVOLVED WITH THIS CONTENT
+
+
How AI Is Reshaping the Future of Work
+
By A Third-Party Contributor
+
The article appears on the same domain as editorial coverage. The headline is professional. The byline looks legitimate. But the label at the top changes everything for an O-1 reviewer.
+
+ What this signals to USCIS: + The editorial team did not select this piece. A third party — often the subject or a PR firm — wrote or paid for it. Treated as advertising, not editorial recognition. +
+
-
-
2
-

Outlet mapping

-

We build a target list of publications matched to your field, your story, and USCIS's stature requirements.

-
-
-
3
-

Pitch & coordinate

-

Tailored pitches to identified journalists. We coordinate interviews, fact-checking, and review windows.

-
-
-
4
-

Documentation

-

Published coverage formatted as O-1A exhibits, with circulation evidence and editorial credential documentation.

+ +
+
National Daily
+
CONTRIBUTOR CONTENT BY [Sponsor]
+
+
10 Trends Changing the Industry in 2026
+
By Branded Content Team
+
Same outlet that produces award-winning journalism. Same URL pattern. Same logo at the top. But this section explicitly indicates third-party authorship and paid placement.
+
+ What this signals to USCIS: + Essentially an advertisement on a respected outlet. Carries minimal evidentiary weight regardless of how the outlet's other journalism is perceived. +
+
+ +

Illustrative mockups showing the labels that distinguish editorial content from contributor / sponsored content on major outlets.

+ +
+

When an article on a major outlet says "EDITORIAL STAFF WERE NOT INVOLVED WITH THIS CONTENT," or "CONTRIBUTOR CONTENT BY," those labels communicate to a USCIS reviewer that:

+
    +
  • The outlet did not editorially choose to cover this person
    • +
  • A third party, often the subject or a PR firm, produced or paid for the content
    • +
  • The article is not evidence of independent recognition — it is essentially an advertisement
    • +
+

This is one of the most common and costly mistakes in O-1 press strategy. Paprika's attorney-curated review catches these distinctions before a placement is made. We do not place contributor content and represent it as editorial coverage.

+
+
-

What we don't do.

-

Honest about the boundary between PR and pay-to-play.

+

Press outlet network.

+

Paprika works with a network of recognized publications across business, technology, science, arts, lifestyle, and industry media. Outlet selection is tailored to your field, background, and O-1 criteria.

-
-
-

No paid placements

-

We don't buy coverage. Paid editorial undermines O-1A admissibility and is increasingly flagged by USCIS adjudicators. Every placement is earned editorial.

+ +
+

Business & Technology

+
+ ForbesBloombergBusiness InsiderTechCrunchVentureBeatFast CompanyEntrepreneurGeekWireMashableYahoo NewsInternational Business TimesBenzingaMarketWatchInvesting.comTech TimesGrit DailyCEOWorld MagazineSmartCompanySuccessVenture Capital Post
-
-

No guaranteed coverage counts

-

We guarantee structured outreach to a defined number of outlets. We do not guarantee any specific journalist will write about you, or any specific publication will run a piece.

+
+ +
+

Science & Research

+
+ Field-specific peer-reviewed journalsAcademic publicationsResearch trade mediaConference proceedings publications
-
-

No fake bylines

-

We don't write articles for you to "publish under your name" in outlets that take submissions for fees. USCIS regularly rejects these.

+
+ +
+

Lifestyle, Arts & Culture

+
+ VogueRolling StoneBillboardGQElleCosmopolitanMarie ClaireHarper's BazaarNylonGlamourGraziaThe Zoe ReportFootwear NewsBustlePastePaperFashion TimesWWDLife & StylePeopleOK!Maxim +
+
+ +
+

Entertainment & Media

+
+ Hollywood LifeE! NewsLos Angeles MagazineLA Weekly +
+
+ +
+

News & General

+
+ USA TodayNewsweekTimeLos Angeles TimesDetroit Free PressSFGateDigital JournalInStyleGlobal Banking & Finance Review +
+
+ +
+

Startup & VC

+
+ Y Combinator-affiliated mediaTechstars publicationsStartup ecosystem coverageAccelerator program media +
+
+ +

Outlet selection is matched to your field and background on intake. Not every outlet is always available.

+
+
+ + +
+
+
+

USCIS-ready evidence package.

+

Every Paprika press engagement is documented for attorney use. Your evidence package typically includes:

+
+ +
+
+

Screenshots & archived links

+

All published articles archived and screenshotted, with date and outlet metadata.

+
+
+

Editor letters on letterhead

+

Letters from editors or managing editors confirming coverage was editorially selected — not sponsored.

+
+
+

Outlet credibility documentation

+

Traffic analytics, circulation data, and comparative readership to support "major media" or "national recognition" arguments where applicable.

+
+
+

Organized documentation packet

+

A clean, structured packet built for straightforward attorney review and exhibit preparation.

+
+
+

Article summary notes

+

For each placement: a brief explaining the outlet's significance, the article's focus, and how it relates to the relevant O-1 criterion.

-
+ +
+
+
+

Placement Guarantee

+

For eligible press packages: if Paprika accepts your project and cannot secure the agreed publication deliverable, we refund the unpublished placement fee. We do not guarantee immigration outcomes, legal eligibility, or USCIS acceptance of any evidence.

+
+
+
+ + +
-

Start with a strategy call.

-

A 30-minute call covering your story, target timeline, current evidence, and whether press is the right gap-filler for your case.

-
- Request a call - See all services +

Start with your profile.

+

Share your LinkedIn or CV. We'll tell you which press path makes sense for your field, timeline, and existing evidence.

+
+ - - diff --git a/v1/privacy.html b/v1/privacy.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..44e86bb --- /dev/null +++ b/v1/privacy.html @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ + + + + + +Privacy Policy — Paprika + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Legal
+

Privacy Policy.

+
+
+ +
+
+
+

Last updated: 2026

+ +

What we collect

+

When you submit the intake form, we collect: your name, email, LinkedIn URL, field, location, target visa or goal, timeline, existing evidence indicators, budget range, service interest, and any additional context you provide. Optionally, you may upload a CV or resume.

+

When you browse the site, we collect standard analytics (page views, referrers, device type) via privacy-respecting tools. We do not use third-party advertising trackers.

+ +

How we use it

+
    +
  • To assess your profile and respond with a recommendation
    • +
  • To coordinate services you engage us for (press, judging, scholarly articles, referrals)
    • +
  • To communicate with you about active engagements and follow-ups
    • +
  • To improve our service and editorial pipeline
    • +
+ +

Who sees your information

+

Your intake details are visible to Paprika team members involved in your engagement. We do not share your information with third parties for marketing.

+

For coordinated services, we may share necessary details with editors, panel organizers, or referred attorneys — only with your authorization, and only the specific details required to coordinate the service.

+ +

Confidentiality of materials

+

Profile materials, CVs, and engagement details are treated as confidential. We do not publish, share, or repurpose client materials without explicit written consent.

+ +

Data retention

+

Active client records are retained for the duration of the engagement and for a reasonable period after completion to support follow-up, references, and our own quality records. Prospect submissions that do not become engagements are retained for up to 24 months unless you request earlier deletion.

+ +

Your rights

+

You may request a copy of your data, request corrections, or request deletion at any time by emailing the contact listed on the Start Here page. We honor reasonable requests promptly.

+ +

Cookies

+

We use a minimal set of cookies for site functionality and aggregate analytics. We do not use cross-site tracking or advertising cookies.

+ +

Children

+

Paprika's services are not directed to individuals under 18. We do not knowingly collect information from minors.

+ +

Changes

+

If we materially change this Privacy Policy, we will update the date above and, for active clients, notify by email.

+ +

Contact

+

For privacy questions, use the Start Here form and note "privacy request" in the context field.

+
+
+
+ + + + + diff --git a/v1/resources.html b/v1/resources.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fe5ce17 --- /dev/null +++ b/v1/resources.html @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ + + + + + +Resources — Paprika + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Resources
+

Educational content for O-1 talent.

+

Criteria explainers, evidence-strategy guides, and answers to the questions every candidate ends up Googling.

+
+
+ +
+
+
+

Start here.

+

Three foundational reads for anyone exploring O-1 evidence-building.

+
+ +
+ +
FAQ
+

Frequently asked questions

+

What Paprika is, what we don't do, when to start, how pricing works, what attorney-curated means.

+ Read FAQ → + + + +
Press 101
+

Editorial vs. contributor content

+

Why an article on the same major outlet can be powerful evidence — or essentially useless. The label tells the story.

+ Read on the Press page → + + + +
Our Standard
+

The questions our review asks

+

The seven evaluative questions Paprika asks before recommending any opportunity. The attorney-caliber lens.

+ See Our Standard → + +
+
+
+ +
+
+
+

Articles in development

+

Our editorial pipeline. Subscribe via the intake form if you'd like to be notified when these go live.

+
    +
  • The O-1A criteria, decoded by what USCIS actually credits
    • +
  • How long should an O-1A press timeline actually be?
    • +
  • Why "contributor content" labels matter (with screenshots)
    • +
  • Picking judging opportunities that count: a field-by-field map
    • +
  • The Dhanasar test in plain English (EB-2 NIW)
    • +
  • What makes a recommendation letter strong vs. generic
    • +
  • Press strategy for founders vs. researchers vs. creators
    • +
  • When to use Paprika alongside your existing attorney
    • +
+
+
+
+ +
+
+
+

Want a profile-specific answer?

+

Generic guides only go so far. Send your LinkedIn or CV and we'll tell you what matters for your case.

+ Send Us Your Profile +
+
+
+ + + + + diff --git a/v1/scholarly.html b/v1/scholarly.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..454c807 --- /dev/null +++ b/v1/scholarly.html @@ -0,0 +1,244 @@ + + + + + +Scholarly Articles — Paprika + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Scholarly Articles
+

Attorney-Curated Scholarly Articles
for O-1 Talent.

+

Scholarly, industry, and expert-authored articles that establish your authority in your field.

+

Authorship of expert articles, industry analyses, and scholarly publications demonstrates that you are a recognized voice in your field — not just a practitioner, but someone whose perspectives and findings others turn to. Paprika coordinates article opportunities across the full spectrum: from peer-reviewed academic journals to recognized industry publications and expert-authored thought leadership.

+
+ Send Us Your Profile + See Packages +
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+

Article types Paprika supports.

+

Different venues serve different evidence purposes. We coordinate the type that fits your field and your trajectory.

+
+ +
+
+
Type · 01
+

Peer-reviewed scholarly articles

+

In academic or research journals with formal peer review processes — the gold standard for academic and research candidates.

+
+
+
Type · 02
+

Industry analysis & expert articles

+

In recognized trade publications where editorial teams credit subject-matter expertise and field credentials.

+
+
+
Type · 03
+

Thought leadership & expert commentary

+

In credible business media — substantive expert commentary that demonstrates authority rather than promotional copy.

+
+
+
Type · 04
+

Technology & research articles

+

For engineers, AI professionals, and scientists — technical articles in venues that engineers and researchers actually read.

+
+
+
Type · 05
+

Expert-authored articles for executives & founders

+

Industry-specific expert articles for senior professionals — written under the candidate's own authorship, in venues that signal field standing.

+
+
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+

USCIS-ready evidence package for scholarly articles.

+

Documentation built for clean attorney review and exhibit preparation.

+
+ +
+
+

Published article with full citation

+

Author, title, publication, date, volume/issue where applicable — every detail an attorney needs for exhibit work.

+
+
+

DOI for peer-reviewed journals

+

Document Object Identifier for any peer-reviewed publication, supporting authenticity verification.

+
+
+

Peer review process info

+

Information about the peer review process for journals that use it — demonstrating the article cleared editorial gatekeeping.

+
+
+

Publication credibility documentation

+

Editorial board details, readership data, ISSN, and other markers of publication standing.

+
+
+

Clean documentation packet for attorney review

+

The full set, organized and indexed for direct exhibit use — no follow-up requests required.

+
+
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+

Add authorship to your evidence plan.

+

Tell us your field and the article type that fits. We'll coordinate the placement, peer review, and documentation.

+ +
+
+
+ + + + + + diff --git a/v1/services.html b/v1/services.html index f731f96..aa59d1d 100644 --- a/v1/services.html +++ b/v1/services.html @@ -3,269 +3,344 @@ -Services — Abigail +Services & Packages — Paprika + - + +
-
Services
-

One platform. Five services.
Pick what your case needs.

-

From AI-only document preparation to full-lifecycle attorney representation, plus evidence-building services that strengthen the petition itself.

+
Services & Packages
+

Packages start at $1,999+

+

Final pricing depends on outlet level, timeline, field, number of placements, and documentation needs. Custom packages available. We recommend what makes sense after reviewing your profile.

+
- - -
-
- 01 -

Filing Services

-
-

Get the petition built, reviewed, and filed. Choose the level of attorney involvement that matches your case.

- -
-
- Self-serve -

AI Drafting Package

-

AI handles the full filing: intake, evidence map, petition narrative, support letter frameworks, cover letter, and form population. You review, sign, and file.

-
From $1,500 · flat fee per filing
- See pricing → -
- -
- Most popular -

AI + Attorney Review

-

Everything in the AI package, plus an Ivy / BigLaw-trained attorney reviews, annotates, and signs off. 3–5 business-day turnaround. Engagement via Abigail Legal Services, P.C.

-
From $5,500 · flat fee per filing
- See pricing → -
- -
- Premium -

Lifecycle Representation

-

Continuous attorney coverage across the full case lifecycle. RFE / NOID responses, status-change strategy, renewals, and green-card pathway planning included.

-
Custom · annual engagement
- Talk to us → -
-
+
+

Package framework.

+

Pick a starting point. Most clients combine services after the initial profile assessment.

- -
-
- 02 -

Evidence-Building Services

+
+ +
+ Starter +

Starter Visibility

+

One attorney-curated press or scholarly article opportunity. For early profile-building when you want to test the engagement before committing further.

+
Starting at $1,999+Per engagement · single placement
+ Start Here
-

Targeted help for the criteria where applicants commonly fall short. Optional add-ons to any filing tier.

-
-
- Add-on -

Press & Media Support

-

Coordinated outreach to industry publications, podcasts, and journalists — building media coverage that qualifies for O-1A Criterion 3 (published material about you).

-
From $2,500 · 90-day engagement
- Learn more → -
- -
- Add-on -

Peer-Review Intros

-

Matched introductions to journals, conferences, hackathons, and grant panels seeking reviewers in your field — building evidence for O-1A Criterion 4 (judging the work of others).

-
From $1,800 · 60-day engagement
- Learn more → -
- -
- Add-on -

RFE Response

-

AI-drafted, attorney-reviewed RFE / NOID responses. The AI has full case context, making responses faster and more precise than starting fresh.

-
From $799 · per response
- See pricing → -
+
+ Most Common +

O-1 Press Foundation

+

Multiple coordinated press opportunities over a natural timeline, with USCIS-ready documentation. The most-requested package for candidates 9–18 months out from filing.

+
Custom quoteBased on outlet level, timeline, field
+ Get a Quote
+ +
+ Comprehensive +

O-1 Evidence Builder

+

Press, judging, scholarly articles, and documentation strategy across multiple O-1 criteria. For candidates building a complete public profile from the ground up.

+
Custom quoteMulti-service · multi-criterion engagement
+ Get a Quote +
+ +
+ Strategy +

Evidence Strategy Session

+

A profile-specific plan: what to build, in what order, for what timeline. Includes criteria prioritization and budget-sensitive options — useful even if you ultimately go elsewhere.

+
Profile-specificSession-based · written plan included
+ Book a Session +
+ +
+ Referral +

Immigration Counsel Referral

+

Need an O-1 attorney or agent petitioner? Paprika can connect you with experienced immigration counsel. This is a referral — not a legal service provided by Paprika.

+
ComplimentaryFor active and qualified inbound clients
+ Contact Our Team +
+ +
+ For Founders +

Founder Visibility

+

For founders and companies expanding into the U.S. market who need credible English-language media presence — for investors, customers, partners, and long-term positioning.

+
Custom quoteTailored to company stage and market
+ Get a Quote +
+
- - -
-
- 03 -

Free Services

-
-

Start here, regardless of which path you eventually take.

- -
-
- Free -

AI Visa Screener

-

Multi-visa simultaneous analysis with green-card roadmap. Outputs candidate pathways and evidence gap analysis based on your background — not a quiz, a structured reasoning engine.

- Run the screener → -
- -
- Free -

Library & Guides

-

Attorney-written breakdowns of every visa category, the criteria USCIS actually credits, and how to respond when an RFE shows up.

- Browse the library → -
-
-
-
+ +
+
+
+

Quality over volume.

+

Paprika is not a mass-placement press shop. We turn down clients whose profiles don't yet make sense for the placements they want. We turn down placements that won't serve a client's case. That selectivity is the service.

+
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+
+

Need immigration counsel or an O-1 agent petitioner?

+

Building strong evidence is the first step. When you're ready to file — or if you have legal questions about O-1 eligibility, petition strategy, or agent filing — Paprika can connect you with experienced immigration attorneys who handle O-1 petitions and agent structures.

+
+ Talk to Our Team +
+
+
+ +
-

Not sure which to start with?

-

The free screener tells you which visa pathway fits and which evidence gaps to close. Most users start there.

-
- Start the free screener - See full pricing -
+

Send your profile.

+

We'll recommend the right package — or tell you honestly if Paprika isn't a fit for where you are in your timeline.

+ Send Us Your Profile
+
-
Abigail.
-
AI-native immigration platform
+
Paprika
+
Attorney-Curated Press & Evidence for O-1 Talent.
-
- -
-
Resources
- - - -
-
-
Legal
- - - -
+
+

Services

+ Press + Judging + Scholarly Articles + Packages +
+
+

About

+ Why Paprika + Resources + FAQ + About +
+
+

Legal

+ Terms of Service + Privacy + Disclaimer + Start Here
- Abigail Technologies, Inc. operates an AI-native immigration platform and does not provide legal services. Legal services, where elected, are provided by Abigail Legal Services, P.C. through a separate engagement letter. Evidence-building services are non-legal professional services and do not guarantee specific media placements or peer-review invitations. Use of the platform's screener output does not constitute legal advice or an attorney-client relationship. + Paprika is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or immigration representation. Use of our services does not create an attorney-client relationship.
- - diff --git a/v1/start-here.html b/v1/start-here.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3742b9b --- /dev/null +++ b/v1/start-here.html @@ -0,0 +1,390 @@ + + + + + +Start Here — Paprika + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Start Here
+

Send us your profile.

+

Share your LinkedIn or CV. We review your background and tell you what evidence path makes sense for your profile and timeline — no commitment required.

+
+
+ +
+
+
+ + +
+

Profile assessment request

+

A real human reviews every submission. We respond within 2 business days.

+ +
+ +
About you
+
+
+ + +
+
+ + +
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+ + +
+
+ + +
+
+
+ + +
PDF, DOC, or DOCX. Optional but helpful.
+
+
+ + +
+ +
Your goals
+
+
+ + +
+
+ + +
+
+ +
Existing evidence
+
+
+ + +
+
+ + +
+
+
+
+ + +
+
+ + +
+
+ +
Engagement
+
+ + +
+
+ + +
+
+ + +
+ + + +
+ By submitting, you agree to be contacted about Paprika's services. We do not share your information with third parties. Submitting this form does not create a client engagement or attorney-client relationship. +
+
+
+ + +
+
+

What happens next

+

A real person from our team reviews your profile and responds with a candid assessment.

+
    +
  • Review within 2 business days
    • +
  • Email with profile feedback and recommended path
    • +
  • Optional follow-up call after written response
    • +
  • No spam, no Calendly link in this thread
    • +
+
+ +
+

Three ways to engage

+
+
Tier 1 · Email Q&A
+

Free. Low-friction inbound. Answered by our team. Not legal advice.

+
+
+
Tier 2 · Intro Call
+

Free or nominal fee. Intake calls, onboarding, service questions. Not a legal consultation.

+
+
+
Tier 3 · Evidence Strategy Session
+

Paid. Profile-specific evidence plan. Framed as evidence strategy, not legal advice.

+
+
+ +
+

Need immigration counsel?

+

If you need O-1 petition representation or agent filing, mention it in the form and our team will route you to an experienced immigration attorney. This is a referral, not a legal service provided by Paprika.

+
+
+ +
+
+
+ + + + + + diff --git a/v1/styles.css b/v1/styles.css index 6f01ac1..ae85185 100644 --- a/v1/styles.css +++ b/v1/styles.css @@ -1,343 +1,357 @@ :root { - --ink: #0A0E1A; - --ink-2: #1A1F2E; - --paper: #FAFAF7; - --paper-2: #F2F2EE; - --signal: #2E6BFF; - --signal-2: #1E50CC; - --caution: #E8A33D; - --halt: #D7423F; - --mute: #8A8F99; - --mute-2: #C7C9CE; - --rule: #E5E5E0; - --rule-dark: #2A2F3D; + /* Paprika brand */ + --paprika: #C0392B; + --paprika-2: #E8472B; + --paprika-light: #FEF5F5; + --warm: #FEF9E7; + --green: #E8F8F5; + + /* Neutrals */ + --ink: #2C3E50; + --body: #333333; + --mute: #888888; + --rule: #E8E8E8; + --paper: #FFFFFF; + --paper-2: #FAFAFA; } * { box-sizing: border-box; } html, body { margin: 0; padding: 0; background: var(--paper); - color: var(--ink); + color: var(--body); font-family: "Inter", -apple-system, "PingFang SC", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; - line-height: 1.55; + line-height: 1.6; -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; } a { color: inherit; text-decoration: none; } -.container { max-width: 1200px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 32px; } +.container { max-width: 1180px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 32px; } + +/* Editorial serif for headlines */ +h1, h2, h3 { + font-family: "Fraunces", "Source Serif Pro", Georgia, serif; + font-weight: 600; + color: var(--ink); + letter-spacing: -0.015em; +} +h1 { font-weight: 700; } /* NAV */ nav { position: sticky; top: 0; z-index: 50; - background: rgba(250,250,247,0.85); + background: rgba(255,255,255,0.96); backdrop-filter: blur(12px); border-bottom: 1px solid var(--rule); } nav .container { display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: space-between; - height: 64px; + height: 72px; + gap: 16px; } -.brand { font-weight: 700; font-size: 18px; letter-spacing: -0.01em; } -.brand-dot { color: var(--signal); } -.nav-links { display: flex; gap: 28px; font-size: 14px; align-items: center; } -.nav-links > a:hover, .nav-trigger:hover { color: var(--signal); } -.nav-links a.active { color: var(--signal); font-weight: 500; } +.brand { + display: flex; flex-direction: column; + text-decoration: none; +} +.brand-name { + font-family: "Fraunces", Georgia, serif; + font-weight: 700; + font-size: 22px; + color: var(--paprika); + letter-spacing: -0.01em; + line-height: 1; +} +.brand-tagline { + font-size: 11px; + color: var(--mute); + font-weight: 400; + letter-spacing: 0.02em; + margin-top: 3px; +} +.nav-links { + display: flex; gap: 28px; + font-size: 14px; + align-items: center; + font-weight: 500; +} +.nav-links a { color: var(--ink); transition: color 0.15s; } +.nav-links a:hover { color: var(--paprika); } +.nav-links a.active { color: var(--paprika); } .nav-cta { - background: var(--ink); color: var(--paper); - padding: 9px 18px; border-radius: 999px; - font-size: 14px; font-weight: 600; - transition: background 0.15s, transform 0.1s; + background: var(--paprika); + color: white !important; + padding: 10px 22px; + border-radius: 999px; + font-size: 14px; + font-weight: 600; + transition: background 0.15s, transform 0.08s; } -.nav-cta:hover { background: var(--ink-2); } +.nav-cta:hover { background: #A8311F; color: white !important; } .nav-cta:active { transform: scale(0.97); } -/* Login link in nav */ -.nav-login { - color: var(--mute); - font-size: 14px; - transition: color 0.15s; -} -.nav-login:hover { color: var(--ink); } - -/* Theme toggle */ -.theme-toggle { - background: transparent; - border: 0; - width: 32px; height: 32px; - border-radius: 50%; - cursor: pointer; - display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; - color: var(--mute); - transition: color 0.15s, background 0.15s; - padding: 0; -} -.theme-toggle:hover { - color: var(--ink); - background: var(--paper-2); -} -.theme-toggle .icon-moon { display: inline-block; } -.theme-toggle .icon-sun { display: none; } -html.dark .theme-toggle .icon-moon { display: none; } -html.dark .theme-toggle .icon-sun { display: inline-block; } - -/* Dark mode palette */ -html.dark { - --ink: #F5F5F0; - --ink-2: #2A2F3D; - --paper: #0A0E1A; - --paper-2: #14192A; - --rule: #2A2F3D; - --rule-dark: #3A3F4D; - --mute: #8A8F99; - --mute-2: #5A5F69; -} -html.dark body { background: var(--paper); color: var(--ink); } -html.dark .card, -html.dark .what-card, -html.dark .anti-card, -html.dark .role-card, -html.dark .pet-card, -html.dark .lead-form, -html.dark .mock, -html.dark .anatomy-wrap, -html.dark .compare-table, -html.dark .case-table, -html.dark .post-card, -html.dark .visa-card, -html.dark .reason-card, -html.dark .situation-card, -html.dark .tier-card { background: var(--ink-2); } -html.dark .field input, -html.dark .field select, -html.dark .field textarea { background: var(--paper-2); color: var(--ink); } -html.dark nav { background: rgba(10,14,26,0.85); } -html.dark .chip { background: var(--ink-2); border-color: var(--rule); color: var(--mute-2); } -html.dark .chip.active { background: var(--ink); color: var(--paper); } - -/* Resources dropdown */ -.nav-dropdown { position: relative; } -.nav-trigger { - background: transparent; border: 0; - font: inherit; font-size: 14px; color: var(--ink); - cursor: pointer; - display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 4px; - padding: 0; -} -.nav-trigger svg { transition: transform 0.2s; } -.nav-dropdown.open .nav-trigger svg { transform: rotate(180deg); } -.dropdown-menu { - position: absolute; - top: calc(100% + 12px); - left: 50%; - transform: translateX(-50%) translateY(-4px); - background: var(--ink); - color: var(--paper); - border: 1px solid var(--rule-dark); - border-radius: 14px; - padding: 12px; - min-width: 240px; - box-shadow: 0 12px 40px rgba(10,14,26,0.2); - opacity: 0; - pointer-events: none; - transition: opacity 0.18s, transform 0.18s; -} -.nav-dropdown.open .dropdown-menu { - opacity: 1; - pointer-events: auto; - transform: translateX(-50%) translateY(0); -} -.dropdown-menu a { - display: block; - padding: 12px 16px; - font-family: "JetBrains Mono", monospace; - font-size: 14px; - color: var(--paper); - border-radius: 8px; - transition: background 0.12s, color 0.12s; -} -.dropdown-menu a:hover { - background: var(--ink-2); - color: var(--signal); -} - /* HERO */ -.hero { padding: 80px 0 56px; } +.hero { padding: 88px 0 64px; } .hero.centered { text-align: center; } .eyebrow { - font-size: 12px; font-weight: 600; - color: var(--signal); - letter-spacing: 0.12em; text-transform: uppercase; - margin-bottom: 16px; + font-size: 12px; + font-weight: 600; + color: var(--paprika); + letter-spacing: 0.14em; + text-transform: uppercase; + margin-bottom: 20px; } .hero h1 { - font-size: 56px; - font-weight: 700; + font-size: 64px; line-height: 1.05; + margin: 0 0 24px; letter-spacing: -0.025em; - margin: 0 0 20px; } -.hero h1 em { font-style: normal; color: var(--signal); } .hero p.lead { - font-size: 18px; color: var(--mute); - margin: 0 0 28px; - max-width: 620px; + font-size: 19px; + color: var(--mute); + margin: 0 0 32px; + max-width: 680px; + line-height: 1.55; } .hero.centered p.lead { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; } - -/* Section */ -.section { padding: 80px 0; } -.section.alt { background: var(--paper-2); } -.section.dark { background: var(--ink); color: var(--paper); } -.section-head { text-align: center; margin-bottom: 48px; } -.section-head h2 { - font-size: 36px; font-weight: 700; - letter-spacing: -0.02em; - margin: 0 0 12px; - line-height: 1.15; - max-width: 760px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; +.hero-ctas { + display: inline-flex; gap: 12px; + margin-bottom: 14px; + flex-wrap: wrap; } -.section-head p { - font-size: 17px; color: var(--mute); - max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; +.hero.centered .hero-ctas { justify-content: center; } +.support-text { + font-size: 13px; color: var(--mute); + max-width: 540px; + line-height: 1.55; } -.section.dark .section-head h2 { color: var(--paper); } -.section.dark .section-head p { color: var(--mute-2); } +.hero.centered .support-text { margin: 0 auto; } /* Buttons */ .btn { display: inline-block; - padding: 12px 22px; - border-radius: 10px; - font-weight: 600; font-size: 14px; + padding: 13px 26px; + border-radius: 999px; + font-weight: 600; + font-size: 15px; transition: all 0.15s; border: 1px solid transparent; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; } -.btn-primary { background: var(--signal); color: white; } -.btn-primary:hover { background: var(--signal-2); } +.btn-primary { background: var(--paprika); color: white; } +.btn-primary:hover { background: #A8311F; color: white; } .btn-secondary { - background: transparent; color: var(--ink); + background: var(--paper); + color: var(--ink); + border-color: var(--rule); +} +.btn-secondary:hover { border-color: var(--ink); } -.btn-secondary:hover { background: var(--ink); color: var(--paper); } -/* Card grids */ -.grid-2 { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(2, 1fr); gap: 20px; } -.grid-3 { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr); gap: 20px; } -.grid-4 { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr); gap: 16px; } +/* Section */ +.section { padding: 88px 0; } +.section.alt { background: var(--paper-2); } +.section.warm { background: var(--paprika-light); } +.section-head { text-align: center; margin-bottom: 56px; } +.section-head h2 { + font-size: 40px; + line-height: 1.15; + margin: 0 0 16px; + max-width: 760px; + margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; +} +.section-head p { + font-size: 17px; + color: var(--mute); + max-width: 620px; + margin: 0 auto; + line-height: 1.6; +} +/* Card */ .card { - background: #FFFFFF; + background: var(--paper); border: 1px solid var(--rule); - border-radius: 16px; - padding: 28px; - transition: border-color 0.15s, transform 0.15s; + border-radius: 14px; + padding: 32px; + transition: border-color 0.15s, transform 0.15s, box-shadow 0.15s; } .card.hover:hover { - border-color: var(--signal); - transform: translateY(-2px); + border-color: var(--paprika); + transform: translateY(-3px); + box-shadow: 0 12px 32px rgba(192,57,43,0.08); } .card h3 { - font-size: 18px; font-weight: 600; - margin: 0 0 8px; - letter-spacing: -0.01em; + font-size: 22px; + margin: 0 0 10px; } -.card p { font-size: 14px; color: var(--mute); margin: 0; line-height: 1.55; } - -/* CTA band */ -.cta-band { - background: var(--ink); - color: var(--paper); - border-radius: 24px; - padding: 64px 48px; - text-align: center; - margin-bottom: 96px; -} -.cta-band h2 { - font-size: 36px; font-weight: 700; - letter-spacing: -0.02em; - margin: 0 0 16px; - line-height: 1.1; -} -.cta-band p { - color: var(--mute-2); - font-size: 17px; - max-width: 540px; margin: 0 auto 28px; -} -.cta-buttons { display: inline-flex; gap: 12px; } -.cta-band .btn-secondary { - color: var(--paper); - border-color: var(--rule-dark); -} -.cta-band .btn-secondary:hover { - background: var(--ink-2); - color: var(--paper); -} - -/* Footer */ -footer { - border-top: 1px solid var(--rule); - padding: 48px 0 64px; +.card p { + font-size: 15px; color: var(--mute); - font-size: 13px; -} -footer .container { - display: flex; justify-content: space-between; - align-items: flex-start; - flex-wrap: wrap; gap: 32px; -} -.footer-links { display: flex; gap: 32px; } -.disclaimer { - border-top: 1px dashed var(--rule); - margin-top: 32px; padding-top: 24px; - font-size: 12px; - line-height: 1.55; - max-width: 760px; + margin: 0; + line-height: 1.6; } -/* Pill / tag */ +.grid-2 { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(2, 1fr); gap: 20px; } +.grid-3 { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr); gap: 20px; } +.grid-4 { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr); gap: 20px; } + +/* Pill */ .pill { display: inline-block; - padding: 3px 10px; + padding: 4px 12px; border-radius: 999px; font-size: 11px; font-weight: 600; letter-spacing: 0.06em; text-transform: uppercase; - background: var(--paper-2); - color: var(--mute); + background: var(--paprika-light); + color: var(--paprika); } -.pill.signal { background: rgba(46,107,255,0.1); color: var(--signal); } -.pill.caution { background: rgba(232,163,61,0.15); color: var(--caution); } +.pill.warm { background: var(--warm); color: #9A6A0A; } +.pill.green { background: var(--green); color: #1B7A60; } +.pill.mute { background: #F0F0EE; color: var(--mute); } + +/* Callout */ +.callout { + background: var(--paprika-light); + border-left: 3px solid var(--paprika); + padding: 20px 24px; + border-radius: 8px; + font-size: 15px; + line-height: 1.6; +} +.callout.warm { background: var(--warm); border-color: #D4A53A; } +.callout.green { background: var(--green); border-color: #1B7A60; } +.callout .lbl { + display: block; + font-size: 11px; + font-weight: 700; + letter-spacing: 0.1em; + text-transform: uppercase; + margin-bottom: 8px; + color: var(--paprika); +} +.callout.warm .lbl { color: #9A6A0A; } +.callout.green .lbl { color: #1B7A60; } + +/* CTA Band */ +.cta-band { + background: var(--paper); + border: 1px solid var(--rule); + border-radius: 18px; + padding: 72px 48px; + text-align: center; + position: relative; + overflow: hidden; +} +.cta-band::before { + content: ""; + position: absolute; + top: -200px; left: 50%; + transform: translateX(-50%); + width: 800px; height: 400px; + background: radial-gradient(ellipse at center, rgba(192,57,43,0.08) 0%, transparent 60%); + pointer-events: none; +} +.cta-band > * { position: relative; } +.cta-band h2 { + font-size: 40px; + margin: 0 0 16px; + line-height: 1.1; +} +.cta-band p { + color: var(--mute); + font-size: 17px; + max-width: 600px; + margin: 0 auto 28px; + line-height: 1.6; +} +.cta-band-dark { + background: var(--ink); + color: var(--paper); + border-radius: 18px; + padding: 64px 48px; + text-align: center; +} +.cta-band-dark h2 { color: var(--paper); } +.cta-band-dark p { color: #C9CDD3; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto 28px; } /* Form */ -.field { display: flex; flex-direction: column; margin-bottom: 12px; } +.field { display: flex; flex-direction: column; margin-bottom: 16px; } .field label { - font-size: 12px; font-weight: 600; - color: var(--mute); letter-spacing: 0.04em; - margin-bottom: 4px; + font-size: 13px; + font-weight: 600; + color: var(--ink); + letter-spacing: 0.02em; + margin-bottom: 6px; } +.field label .req { color: var(--paprika); } .field input, .field select, .field textarea { - background: var(--paper-2); + background: var(--paper); border: 1px solid var(--rule); - border-radius: 8px; - padding: 10px 12px; + border-radius: 10px; + padding: 12px 14px; font: inherit; - font-size: 14px; + font-size: 15px; color: var(--ink); transition: border-color 0.15s, background 0.15s; } .field input:focus, .field select:focus, .field textarea:focus { outline: none; - border-color: var(--signal); - background: #FFFFFF; + border-color: var(--paprika); + background: var(--paprika-light); +} +.field textarea { resize: vertical; min-height: 90px; } +.field-hint { + font-size: 12px; + color: var(--mute); + margin-top: 4px; +} + +/* Footer */ +footer { + border-top: 1px solid var(--rule); + padding: 64px 0 48px; + color: var(--mute); + font-size: 13px; + background: var(--paper-2); +} +footer .container { + display: grid; + grid-template-columns: 1.5fr repeat(3, 1fr); + gap: 48px; + align-items: flex-start; +} +.footer-col h4 { + font-family: "Inter", sans-serif; + font-size: 12px; + font-weight: 700; + letter-spacing: 0.1em; + text-transform: uppercase; + color: var(--ink); + margin: 0 0 12px; +} +.footer-col a { display: block; padding: 4px 0; } +.footer-col a:hover { color: var(--paprika); } +.disclaimer { + border-top: 1px solid var(--rule); + margin-top: 32px; + padding-top: 24px; + font-size: 12px; + line-height: 1.6; + max-width: 820px; + color: var(--mute); } /* Responsive */ @media (max-width: 880px) { - .hero h1 { font-size: 40px; } + .hero h1 { font-size: 44px; } + .section-head h2 { font-size: 32px; } .grid-2, .grid-3, .grid-4 { grid-template-columns: 1fr; } .nav-links { display: none; } - .cta-band { padding: 48px 24px; } + .cta-band, .cta-band-dark { padding: 48px 28px; } .section { padding: 56px 0; } + footer .container { grid-template-columns: 1fr; gap: 32px; } } diff --git a/v1/terms.html b/v1/terms.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d711734 --- /dev/null +++ b/v1/terms.html @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + + + +Terms of Service — Paprika + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Legal
+

Terms of Service.

+
+
+ +
+
+
+

Last updated: 2026

+ +
+

Paprika is a media, visibility, and evidence-support company. Paprika is not a law firm and does not provide immigration legal advice, legal representation, or visa filing services.

+
+ +

1. Nature of services

+

Paprika provides press coordination, judging-opportunity introductions, scholarly article coordination, profile assessment, evidence-strategy planning, and immigration-counsel referrals. These are non-legal professional services.

+ +

2. "Attorney-curated" defined

+

References to "attorney-curated" mean that evidence-building services are reviewed for general immigration-evidence relevance by licensed legal professionals or legally trained reviewers. The phrase does not mean that Paprika provides legal advice through these services, that an attorney-client relationship is created, or that any specific O-1 outcome is being guaranteed or implied.

+ +

3. No attorney-client relationship

+

Use of Paprika's services does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Paprika or between you and any reviewer affiliated with Paprika. Communications with Paprika team members and reviewers are not covered by attorney-client privilege through Paprika.

+ +

4. Independent immigration counsel

+

O-1 eligibility, petition strategy, petitioner and agent matters, and filing decisions should be reviewed by independent immigration counsel. Paprika can connect clients with experienced immigration attorneys upon request — these connections are referrals, not legal services provided by Paprika.

+ +

5. No outcome guarantees

+

No press, judging, authorship, or visibility service can guarantee visa approval or USCIS acceptance of any evidence. Where Paprika expressly states a placement-delivery guarantee for a specific package, that guarantee is limited to the publication deliverable described in the engagement letter — it does not extend to immigration outcomes, legal eligibility, or USCIS evidentiary weight.

+ +

6. Editorial integrity

+

Paprika does not purchase editorial placements and does not represent contributor or sponsored content as editorial coverage. All press outreach is editorial in nature. Where an outlet permits paid sponsorship or contributor sections, Paprika does not place clients there in the course of O-1 evidence engagements.

+ +

7. Client representations

+

Clients represent that information provided in intake — including credentials, prior press, judging history, and authorship — is accurate. Paprika may decline or terminate engagements if material misrepresentations are identified.

+ +

8. Fees and refunds

+

Engagement-specific fees, milestones, and refund terms are set out in the individual engagement letter signed by both parties. Placement-guarantee refunds, where applicable, apply only to the unpublished placement fee, not to engagement-wide costs.

+ +

9. Confidentiality

+

Paprika treats client profiles, intake materials, and engagement details as confidential. We do not share client information with third parties except as necessary to coordinate the agreed services (e.g., communicating with editors, panel organizers, or referred attorneys with client authorization).

+ +

10. Limitation of liability

+

Paprika's liability under any engagement is limited to the fees actually paid for that engagement. Paprika is not liable for indirect, consequential, or speculative damages, including but not limited to denied or delayed immigration outcomes.

+ +

11. Governing law

+

These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of California. Any dispute arising under these Terms shall be resolved exclusively in the state or federal courts located in San Francisco, California.

+ +

12. Changes

+

Paprika may update these Terms from time to time. Material changes will be communicated to active clients via email. Continued use of Paprika services following an update constitutes acceptance of the revised Terms.

+
+
+
+ + + + + diff --git a/v1/why-paprika.html b/v1/why-paprika.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5fc0390 --- /dev/null +++ b/v1/why-paprika.html @@ -0,0 +1,283 @@ + + + + + +Our Standard — Paprika + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Why Paprika
+

Our Standard.

+

Paprika is built around a simple idea: visibility only matters if it can be trusted, documented, and used. Not every article helps an O-1 case. Not every judging role is worth doing. Our review process exists to ask the questions a generic PR firm never asks — and to apply judgment that comes from elite legal training, not marketing instinct.

+
+
+ + +
+
+
+
The credential floor
+

Our attorneys bring Ivy League legal training and Vault 10 BigLaw experience to every evidence review — the same judgment applied to high-stakes legal work, now applied to your O-1 profile.

+

Paprika's review framework is developed by attorneys with Ivy League legal training and experience at firms ranked among the most elite in the world — with direct experience reviewing immigration-related evidence, workforce documentation, and professional credentials across large cross-border organizations. Our role is not to provide immigration legal advice through Paprika. It is to apply that same level of judgment to the quality, timing, field-fit, and documentation of every press, judging, and scholarly article opportunity we coordinate.

+
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+

What the review asks.

+

Before recommending any press, judging, or scholarly article opportunity, Paprika evaluates it through the lens of what actually matters for evidence.

+
+ +
+
    +
  1. Is this genuinely about the individual, or just their company?
    2. +
  2. Does it connect to their specific O-1 field and criteria?
    3. +
  3. Is the source credible, independent, and properly documented?
    4. +
  4. Does the timing support a natural public profile?
    5. +
  5. Is this evaluative, substantive, or authoritative — or is it ceremonial or promotional?
    6. +
  6. Will an immigration attorney be able to use this cleanly?
    7. +
  7. Does it strengthen the overall evidence picture?
    8. +
+

These questions require attorney-level judgment, field-specific knowledge, and direct familiarity with how USCIS weighs evidence. Paprika applies that standard to every engagement.

+
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+

What this page is — and what it is not.

+

This page describes our review standard and the caliber of judgment we apply. It is intentionally not an attorney-matching marketplace or a directory of named lawyers.

+
    +
  • This is not an attorney directory or attorney-matching service.
    • +
  • Paprika does not pair clients with attorneys for legal filing through this page.
    • +
  • For O-1 petition filing and agent representation, see Immigration Counsel Referral.
    • +
  • Paprika does not represent itself as a law firm and does not provide legal advice.
    • +
+
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+

The standard, applied to your profile.

+

Send us your LinkedIn or CV. We'll tell you whether Paprika is the right fit — and what we'd actually recommend if it is.

+ +
+
+
+ + + + + +