Judging

Attorney-Curated Judging
for O-1 Talent.

Evaluating the work of others in your field is one of the most valued — and most overlooked — O-1 evidence categories.

Being selected to judge means professionals and organizations in your field have recognized your expertise as sufficient to evaluate others' work. The roles that carry evidentiary weight are selective, field-relevant, properly documented, and clearly evaluative — not ceremonial or participation-based. Paprika identifies and coordinates judging opportunities that meet these standards.

What counts as judging.

Roles that demonstrate professionals in your field trust your expertise to evaluate the work of others.

Startup pitch competitions

Accelerator demo-day judging panels and pitch evaluation roles.

Hackathon & innovation judging

Technical evaluation of submissions to competitive innovation events.

Industry award committees

Award evaluation committees in your professional field.

Academic & conference peer review

Refereeing manuscripts for journals, conferences, or field publications.

Grant review panels

Reviewing applications for grant programs, fellowships, or accelerators.

Professional program reviews

Serving on review boards for established professional development programs.

Startup investment committees

Investment committee participation evaluating funding decisions.

Research competition judging

Evaluating research projects, theses, or competitive scientific submissions.

Judging competition network.

Examples from Paprika's judging network, tailored by field.

Startup & Technology

Y Combinator Demo Day adjacentTechCrunch DisruptSXSW PitchWeb SummitSlushCollisionF.oundersStartup Grind GlobalMassChallengePlug and Play500 GlobalBerkeley SkyDeckAngelPadTechstarsFounder InstituteNewChip AcceleratorAdjacent

Sciences, Design, Arts & Research

Field-specific peer review panelsAcademic journal reviewConference TPCsDesign competition juriesArts award panelsResearch grant committeesProfessional program reviews

Competition and judging placement is matched to your field, background, and timeline on intake.

USCIS-ready evidence package for judging.

Documentation built for attorney use and exhibit preparation.

Verification letter on letterhead

From the competition or program organizer, confirming your selection, panel selectivity, and the scope of your evaluation role.

Panel agenda & bio listing

Official program documentation showing your name and judging role.

Judge selection documentation

How judges were selected and what criteria were used — the selectivity narrative.

Competitive pool confirmation

Where applicable: confirmation that you were selected from a competitive pool of applicants based on field expertise.

Organizer correspondence

Email and formal communication confirming your participation, preserved for the record.

Attorney-ready packet

A documentation packet organized for clean attorney review and direct exhibit use.

Add judging to your evidence plan.

Tell us your field and timeline. We'll match you to selective judging opportunities that carry real evidentiary weight.

Send Us Your Profile See Packages