84 lines
84 KiB
TypeScript
84 lines
84 KiB
TypeScript
export type LegacyPageKey = "home" | "press" | "judging" | "scholarly" | "services" | "why" | "resources" | "faq" | "thanks" | "terms" | "privacy" | "disclaimer";
|
||
|
||
export type LegacyPage = {
|
||
key: LegacyPageKey;
|
||
path: string;
|
||
title: string;
|
||
html: string;
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
export const legacyPages = {
|
||
"home": {
|
||
"key": "home",
|
||
"path": "/",
|
||
"title": "Paprika",
|
||
"html": "\n <section class=\"hero\">\n <h1>O-1 evidence should not be built in a <em>panic.</em></h1>\n <p class=\"subhead\">Paprika helps founders, engineers, researchers, executives, and creators build credible public recognition early — through attorney-curated press, judging opportunities, and evidence-conscious visibility strategy.</p>\n <div class=\"actions\">\n <a class=\"button primary\" href=\"/start\">Send Us Your Profile</a>\n <a class=\"button secondary\" href=\"/ask\">Ask a Question</a>\n </div>\n <p class=\"microcopy\">Share your LinkedIn or CV. We review your background and tell you what evidence path makes sense for your profile and timeline — no commitment required.</p>\n <p class=\"time-line\">The only thing you cannot buy later is time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"home-services-intro\">\n <div class=\"kicker\">Core services</div>\n <h2>Three core services.</h2>\n <p>Curated by attorneys. Designed for evidence value, not vanity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"cards\">\n \n <article class=\"card\">\n <div class=\"meta\"><span class=\"num\">01</span><span class=\"label\">Press</span></div>\n <h2>Editorial feature in a recognized publication in your field.</h2>\n <p>Tailored to your profile. Reviewed for outlet credibility, editorial independence, and evidence value — beyond name recognition.</p>\n <a class=\"explore\" href=\"/press\">Explore Press</a>\n </article>\n \n <article class=\"card\">\n <div class=\"meta\"><span class=\"num\">02</span><span class=\"label\">Judging</span></div>\n <h2>Opportunities to judge work that matters.</h2>\n <p>We help you secure judging roles at credible competitions, awards panels, and peer review journals that count.</p>\n <a class=\"explore\" href=\"/judging\">Explore Judging</a>\n </article>\n \n <article class=\"card\">\n <div class=\"meta\"><span class=\"num\">03</span><span class=\"label\">Scholarly Articles</span></div>\n <h2>Scholarly articles in credible, peer-reviewed publications.</h2>\n <p>We help you publish in peer-reviewed, Scopus-indexed, and Google-verified journals in support of the Scholarly Articles criterion.</p>\n <a class=\"explore\" href=\"/scholarly\">Explore Articles</a>\n </article>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"statement-section split-feature\">\n <div class=\"section-head\">\n <div class=\"kicker\">Start Early</div>\n <h2>The one thing you cannot buy later is time.</h2>\n <p>Evidence that appears in a single burst right before filing raises questions. Paprika helps you build a public record over time — so your profile looks like what it is: real recognition, built before you needed it.</p>\n </div>\n <ul class=\"list\">\n <li><span class=\"arrow\">→</span><span>Build recognition before you need to prove it</span></li>\n <li><span class=\"arrow\">→</span><span>Create a more natural publication and judging timeline</span></li>\n <li><span class=\"arrow\">→</span><span>Avoid last-minute evidence panic</span></li>\n <li><span class=\"arrow\">→</span><span>Give you or your immigration attorney stronger materials to work with</span></li>\n <li class=\"no-arrow\"><span class=\"arrow\">→</span><span>Start today — one article or one judging role can dramatically change your timeline.</span></li>\n </ul>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"question-section\">\n <div class=\"section-head\" style=\"margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;\">\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">Our standard</div>\n <h2 class=\"section-title\">Not all press helps. Not all judging counts.</h2>\n <p class=\"section-copy\">Paprika focuses on evidence value. Before recommending any placement or opportunity, we evaluate it against the standards that matter for your specific profile and future immigration review.</p>\n </div>\n <div class=\"question-card\">\n <h3 class=\"question-card-title\">The questions we ask before recommending anything</h3>\n <div class=\"questions\">\n <div class=\"question-item\"><span class=\"question-num\">01</span><span>Is the article actually about you — not just your company or product?</span></div>\n <div class=\"question-item\"><span class=\"question-num\">02</span><span>Does it connect to your specific professional field and O-1 criteria?</span></div>\n <div class=\"question-item\"><span class=\"question-num\">03</span><span>Does the outlet appear credible, independent, and documentable?</span></div>\n <div class=\"question-item\"><span class=\"question-num\">04</span><span>Does the timing make sense for a natural, organic-looking public profile?</span></div>\n <div class=\"question-item\"><span class=\"question-num\">05</span><span>Does the judging role involve genuinely evaluating others’ work — or is it ceremonial?</span></div>\n <div class=\"question-item\"><span class=\"question-num\">06</span><span>Does the authorship reflect real expertise, or does it read as promotional content?</span></div>\n <div class=\"question-item\"><span class=\"question-num\">07</span><span>Can this be clearly organized and used in an evidence package?</span></div>\n <div class=\"question-item\"><span class=\"question-num\">08</span><span>Does it complement your other existing criteria?</span></div>\n </div>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"process-section\">\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">How it works</div>\n <h2 class=\"section-title\" style=\"margin-top:18px;\">Four simple steps</h2>\n <p class=\"section-copy\">Four steps from profile review to a clean, documented evidence package.</p>\n <div class=\"steps\">\n <article class=\"step\"><div class=\"step-num\">1</div><p>Send us your profile — LinkedIn, CV, or a short description of your work<br>and goals.</p></article>\n <article class=\"step\"><div class=\"step-num\">2</div><p>We assess your background and recommend the evidence path that fits.</p></article>\n <article class=\"step\"><div class=\"step-num\">3</div><p>We work with you — building a credible public record tailored to your profile, timeline, and O-1 goals.</p></article>\n <article class=\"step\"><div class=\"step-num\">4</div><p>Receive a clean, documented evidence package built for O-1 review — organized with publication details, screenshots, source links, outlet context, and supporting materials.</p></article>\n </div>\n <div class=\"pricing-band\">\n <div>\n <h3>Packages start at <strong>$1,699+</strong></h3>\n <p>Final pricing depends on outlet level, timeline, field, and evidence goals. We'll recommend what makes sense after reviewing your background.</p>\n </div>\n <a class=\"button primary\" href=\"/services\">See Services</a>\n </div>\n </section>"
|
||
},
|
||
"press": {
|
||
"key": "press",
|
||
"path": "/press",
|
||
"title": "Paprika - press",
|
||
"html": "\n \n <section class=\"hero subpage\">\n <div class=\"hero-kicker\">Press</div>\n <h1>Attorney-Curated Press for O-1 Talent.</h1>\n <p class=\"subhead press-hero-subhead\">Press that works as evidence, not just visibility. Editorial coverage is strongest when the outlet, format, field relevance, and documentation all work together.</p>\n <div class=\"actions\">\n <a class=\"button primary\" href=\"/start\">Start Here</a>\n <a class=\"button secondary\" href=\"/ask\">Ask a Question</a>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"press-cadence\">\n <p>Uncurated evidence that appears without strategy or in a single burst right before filing raises questions. Paprika helps you build a natural cadence of press over time — so your profile looks like what it is: real recognition, built before you needed it.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"press-standard\">\n <div class=\"section-head\">\n <div>\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">Evidence standards</div>\n <h2 class=\"section-title\">What Paprika looks for.</h2>\n </div>\n <p class=\"section-copy\">Before recommending any placement, we evaluate your profile and the opportunity against the considerations that actually matter for immigration evidence.</p>\n </div>\n <div class=\"press-check-card\">\n <div class=\"press-check-item\"><span class=\"press-check-num\">01</span><span>Is the article about you personally — your expertise, your work, your recognition — not just your company?</span></div>\n <div class=\"press-check-item\"><span class=\"press-check-num\">02</span><span>Does the headline feature your name and connect to your field?</span></div>\n <div class=\"press-check-item\"><span class=\"press-check-num\">03</span><span>Is the content editorial genuine coverage, not a paid feature or contributor post?</span></div>\n <div class=\"press-check-item\"><span class=\"press-check-num\">04</span><span>Does the outlet have real readership, editorial standards, and a clean track record?</span></div>\n <div class=\"press-check-item\"><span class=\"press-check-num\">05</span><span>Is there any contributor, sponsored, or editorial-staff-not-involved disclosure, among countless others, that signals the article lacks true independence?</span></div>\n <div class=\"press-check-item\"><span class=\"press-check-num\">06</span><span>Does the timing fit a natural, organic-looking trajectory rather than a sudden cluster before filing?</span></div>\n <div class=\"press-check-item\"><span class=\"press-check-num\">07</span><span>Does the coverage complement your other O-1 criteria?</span></div>\n <p class=\"press-check-closing\">The outlet name is not the evidence. The editorial independence is.</p>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"avoid-section\">\n <div class=\"section-head\">\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">What to avoid</div>\n <h2 class=\"section-title\">Press that will not help your case.</h2>\n <p class=\"section-copy\">A recognizable outlet name is not enough. Disclosures, contributor labels, sponsored formats, and weak editorial involvement can make a placement much harder to use as evidence.</p>\n </div>\n <div class=\"avoid-grid\">\n \n <article class=\"avoid-card\">\n <div class=\"avoid-mock\">\n <div class=\"mock-bar\"></div>\n <span class=\"mock-source\">Major Tech Publication</span>\n <span class=\"mock-disclosure\">Contributor content</span>\n <span class=\"avoid-x-stamp\" aria-hidden=\"true\"></span>\n </div>\n <div class=\"avoid-card-body\">\n <h3>Contributor content</h3>\n <p>A byline or label that signals the article was not selected through normal editorial review.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n \n <article class=\"avoid-card\">\n <div class=\"avoid-mock\">\n <div class=\"mock-bar\"></div>\n <span class=\"mock-source\">National Daily</span>\n <span class=\"mock-disclosure\">Editorial staff not involved</span>\n <span class=\"avoid-x-stamp\" aria-hidden=\"true\"></span>\n </div>\n <div class=\"avoid-card-body\">\n <h3>Editorial staff not involved</h3>\n <p>A disclosure that the outlet’s editors did not participate in creating or approving the content.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n \n <article class=\"avoid-card\">\n <div class=\"avoid-mock\">\n <div class=\"mock-bar\"></div>\n <span class=\"mock-source\">Lifestyle Magazine</span>\n <span class=\"mock-disclosure\">Sponsored or promotional placement</span>\n <span class=\"avoid-x-stamp\" aria-hidden=\"true\"></span>\n </div>\n <div class=\"avoid-card-body\">\n <h3>Sponsored or promotional placement</h3>\n <p>Coverage that reads like marketing, advertorial content, or company promotion rather than recognition of your work.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n </div>\n <div class=\"avoid-explain\">\n <h3>Why these labels matter.</h3>\n <ul>\n <li>The outlet did not editorially choose to cover this person.</li>\n <li>A third party produced or paid for the content.</li>\n <li>The article is not evidence of independent recognition. It reads more like advertising.</li>\n </ul>\n <p class=\"avoid-explain-note\">This is one of the most common and costly mistakes in O-1 press strategy. Paprika’s attorney-curated review evaluates every placement for editorial independence before it moves forward. We do not present contributor content — regardless of how it is labeled — as editorial coverage.</p>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"outlet-network\">\n <div class=\"outlet-network-head\">\n <div>\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">Our outlet network</div>\n <h2>Representative outlets.</h2>\n </div>\n <p>Our network is not limited to the publications below.</p>\n </div>\n <div class=\"outlet-grid\">\n <span class=\"outlet-name\">Forbes</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Bloomberg</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Vogue</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Business Insider</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">USA Today</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">TechCrunch</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">VentureBeat</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Los Angeles Times</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">HuffPost</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Newsweek</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Marie Claire</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Mashable</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Rolling Stone</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Maxim</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">GQ</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Yahoo News</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">People</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Elle</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">OK!</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Billboard</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Los Angeles Magazine</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">MarketWatch</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Men's Journal</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">SmartCompany</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Success</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">CEOWorld Magazine</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Grit Daily</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Benzinga</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Fast Company México</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">WWD</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Global Banking & Finance Review</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Paper</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Fashion Times</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Paste</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Bustle</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Footwear News</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Nylon</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Cosmopolitan</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Inverse</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Fox</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">The Zoe Report</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Entrepreneur</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Life & Style</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">International Business Times</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Tech Times</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Galore</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Digital Journal</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">CBJ</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">LA Weekly</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Muscle & Fitness</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Geek Extreme</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Venture Capital Post</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Harper's Bazaar</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">E! News</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Detroit Free Press</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">SFGate</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Hollywood Life</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Glamour</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Grazia</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Investing.com</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">GeekWire</span><span class=\"outlet-name\">Time</span>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"services-cta\">\n <div class=\"services-cta-inner\">\n <div>\n <h2>Build the record your work deserves.</h2>\n <p>Share your background. We’ll help identify the evidence path that fits your field, timeline, and O-1 goals.</p>\n </div>\n <a class=\"button\" href=\"/start\">Send Us Your Profile <span class=\"button-arrow\">→</span></a>\n </div>\n </section>"
|
||
},
|
||
"judging": {
|
||
"key": "judging",
|
||
"path": "/judging",
|
||
"title": "Paprika - judging",
|
||
"html": "\n \n <section class=\"hero subpage judging-hero\">\n <div class=\"hero-kicker\">Judging</div>\n <h1>Judging roles should show that your field trusts your expertise.</h1>\n <p class=\"subhead\">Paprika helps source and vet selective evaluation opportunities where you are asked to review, rank, score, or judge others’ work.</p>\n <div class=\"actions\">\n <a class=\"button primary\" href=\"/start\">Start Here</a>\n <a class=\"button secondary\" href=\"/ask\">Ask a Question</a>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"judging-counts\">\n <div class=\"section-head\">\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">Judging evidence</div>\n <h2 class=\"section-title\">What counts as judging.</h2>\n <p class=\"section-copy\">Judging must be selective, field-relevant, and genuinely evaluative. Paprika secures roles where your background speaks for itself — as a reviewer, judge, committee member, or evaluator in your field.</p>\n </div>\n <div class=\"judging-counts-grid\">\n \n <article class=\"judging-count-card\">\n <span class=\"arrow\">→</span>\n <div>\n <h3>Startup pitch competitions</h3>\n <p>Accelerator demo-day judging panels and pitch evaluation roles.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"judging-count-card\">\n <span class=\"arrow\">→</span>\n <div>\n <h3>Hackathon & innovation judging</h3>\n <p>Judging roles at selective, well-recognized hackathons and innovation competitions.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"judging-count-card\">\n <span class=\"arrow\">→</span>\n <div>\n <h3>Industry award committees</h3>\n <p>Award evaluation committees in your professional field.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"judging-count-card\">\n <span class=\"arrow\">→</span>\n <div>\n <h3>Academic & conference peer review</h3>\n <p>Peer review roles at established, credible journals and recognized academic conferences in your field.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"judging-count-card\">\n <span class=\"arrow\">→</span>\n <div>\n <h3>Grant review panels</h3>\n <p>Reviewing applications for grant programs, fellowships, or accelerators.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"judging-count-card\">\n <span class=\"arrow\">→</span>\n <div>\n <h3>Research competition judging</h3>\n <p>Evaluating research projects, theses, or competitive scientific submissions.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"judging-network\">\n <div class=\"judging-network-head\">\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">Judging network</div>\n <h2>Examples from Paprika's judging network.</h2>\n </div>\n <div class=\"judging-network-chips\">\n <span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Y Combinator Demo Day Adjacent</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">TechCrunch Disrupt</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">SXSW Pitch</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Web Summit</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Slush</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Collision</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">F.ounders</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Startup Grind Global</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">MassChallenge</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Plug and Play</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">500 Global</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Berkeley SkyDeck</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">AngelPad</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Techstars</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Founder Institute</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">NewChip Accelerator</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Field-specific peer review panels</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Academic journal review</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Conference TPCs</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Design competition juries</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Arts award panels</span><span class=\"judging-network-chip\">Research grant committees</span>\n </div>\n <div class=\"judging-network-note\">Competition and judging placement is matched to your field, background, and timeline.</div>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"judging-package\">\n <div class=\"judging-package-head\">\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">Evidence package</div>\n <h2>Your judging role, fully documented.</h2>\n </div>\n <div class=\"judging-package-grid\">\n \n <article class=\"judging-package-card\">\n <span class=\"check-dot\">✓</span>\n <div>\n <h3>Signed organizer recommendation letter</h3>\n <p>A signed letter from the competition or program organizer documenting your judging role, panel selectivity, and the scope of your evaluation work.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"judging-package-card\">\n <span class=\"check-dot\">✓</span>\n <div>\n <h3>Judge selection documentation</h3>\n <p>How judges were selected and what criteria were used — the selectivity narrative.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"judging-package-card\">\n <span class=\"check-dot\">✓</span>\n <div>\n <h3>Organizer correspondence</h3>\n <p>Email and formal communication confirming your participation, preserved for the record.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"judging-package-card\">\n <span class=\"check-dot\">✓</span>\n <div>\n <h3>Agenda & event page</h3>\n <p>Official agenda, program materials, or event page showing the judging opportunity and the context of your role.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"judging-package-card\">\n <span class=\"check-dot\">✓</span>\n <div>\n <h3>Panel agenda & bio listing</h3>\n <p>Program documentation showing your name and judging role.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"judging-package-card\">\n <span class=\"check-dot\">✓</span>\n <div>\n <h3>Ready-to-use packet</h3>\n <p>A structured summary of your judging role — the panel's selectivity, field relevance, and the substance of what you evaluated — compiled with all supporting materials into a single clean packet.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"services-cta\">\n <div class=\"services-cta-inner\">\n <div>\n <h2>Extraordinary work deserves a record that shows it.</h2>\n <p>Share your background. We’ll help identify the evidence path that fits your field, timeline, and O-1 goals.</p>\n </div>\n <a class=\"button\" href=\"/start\">Send Us Your Profile <span class=\"button-arrow\">→</span></a>\n </div>\n </section>"
|
||
},
|
||
"scholarly": {
|
||
"key": "scholarly",
|
||
"path": "/scholarly",
|
||
"title": "Paprika - scholarly",
|
||
"html": "\n \n <section class=\"hero subpage scholarly-articles-hero\">\n <div class=\"hero-kicker\">Scholarly Articles</div>\n <h1>Scholarly articles in credible, peer-reviewed publications.</h1>\n <p class=\"subhead\">We help you publish in peer-reviewed, Scopus-indexed, and Google-verified journals in support of the Scholarly Articles criterion.</p>\n <div class=\"actions\">\n <a class=\"button primary\" href=\"/start\">Start Here</a>\n <a class=\"button secondary\" href=\"/ask\">Ask a Question</a>\n </div>\n </section>\n <section class=\"section\">\n <div class=\"two-col\"><article class=\"panel\"><h2>Attorney-curated strategy</h2><p>We identify publication opportunities that fit your field, background, and O-1 profile — with an evidence-conscious lens on credibility, relevance, and positioning.</p></article><article class=\"panel\"><h2>Complete evidence packet</h2><p>Everything organized and ready to use. The result is a clean, professional package that brings the evidence together in a clear, usable format to support your O-1 profile.</p></article></div>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"services-cta\">\n <div class=\"services-cta-inner\">\n <div>\n <h2>Build authorship evidence with purpose.</h2>\n <p>Share your background. We’ll help identify whether scholarly articles make sense for your field, timeline, and O-1 goals.</p>\n </div>\n <a class=\"button\" href=\"/start\">Send Us Your Profile <span class=\"button-arrow\">→</span></a>\n </div>\n </section>"
|
||
},
|
||
"services": {
|
||
"key": "services",
|
||
"path": "/services",
|
||
"title": "Paprika - services",
|
||
"html": "\n \n <section class=\"hero subpage services-hero\">\n <div class=\"hero-kicker\">Services</div>\n <h1>Build every part of your<br>O‑1 profile in <span class=\"accent\">one place.</span></h1>\n <p class=\"subhead\">Attorney-curated, tailored to your profile, and fully documented.</p>\n <div class=\"actions\">\n <a class=\"button primary\" href=\"/start\">Start Here</a>\n <a class=\"button secondary\" href=\"/ask\">Ask a Question</a>\n </div>\n </section>\n <section class=\"cards\">\n \n <article class=\"card\">\n <div class=\"meta\"><span class=\"num\">01</span><span class=\"label\">Press</span></div>\n <h2>Editorial feature in a recognized publication in your field.</h2>\n <p>Tailored to your profile. Reviewed for outlet credibility, editorial independence, and evidence value — beyond name recognition.</p>\n <a class=\"explore\" href=\"/press\">Explore Press</a>\n </article>\n \n <article class=\"card\">\n <div class=\"meta\"><span class=\"num\">02</span><span class=\"label\">Judging</span></div>\n <h2>Opportunities to judge work that matters.</h2>\n <p>We help you secure judging roles at credible competitions, awards panels, and peer review journals that count.</p>\n <a class=\"explore\" href=\"/judging\">Explore Judging</a>\n </article>\n \n <article class=\"card\">\n <div class=\"meta\"><span class=\"num\">03</span><span class=\"label\">Scholarly Articles</span></div>\n <h2>Scholarly articles in credible, peer-reviewed publications.</h2>\n <p>We help you publish in peer-reviewed, Scopus-indexed, and Google-verified journals in support of the Scholarly Articles criterion.</p>\n <a class=\"explore\" href=\"/scholarly\">Explore Articles</a>\n </article>\n \n <article class=\"card\">\n <div class=\"meta\"><span class=\"num\">04</span><span class=\"label\">Expert consultation</span></div>\n <h2>Know where you stand before you commit.</h2>\n <p>A profile review and evidence path recommendation tailored to your background, field, and goals.</p>\n <a class=\"explore\" href=\"/start\">Start Here</a>\n </article>\n \n <article class=\"card\">\n <div class=\"meta\"><span class=\"num\">05</span><span class=\"label\">Agency representation</span></div>\n <h2>Useful when you have multiple engagements or no single employer.</h2>\n <p>We can refer you to trusted agent petitioners who can serve as your U.S. agent for O-1 purposes, if you need one.</p>\n <a class=\"explore\" href=\"/start\">Start Here</a>\n </article>\n \n <article class=\"card\">\n <div class=\"meta\"><span class=\"num\">06</span><span class=\"label\">Attorney Referral</span></div>\n <h2>The right attorney, when you need one.</h2>\n <p><strong>Need an attorney?</strong> We can introduce you to O-1 immigration attorneys selected for elite legal training, BigLaw-level rigor, thoughtful case strategy, and genuine care for your outcome.</p>\n <a class=\"explore\" href=\"/start\">Start Here</a>\n </article>\n </section>\n <p class=\"services-record-note\">Paprika helps you build a public record over time — so your profile looks like what it is:<br>real recognition, built before you needed it.</p>\n \n <section class=\"services-cta\">\n <div class=\"services-cta-inner\">\n <div>\n <h2>You’ve done the work. Now build the record that shows it.</h2>\n <p>Share your background. We’ll help identify the evidence path that fits your field, timeline, and O-1 goals.</p>\n </div>\n <a class=\"button\" href=\"/start\">Send Us Your Profile <span class=\"button-arrow\">→</span></a>\n </div>\n </section>\n "
|
||
},
|
||
"why": {
|
||
"key": "why",
|
||
"path": "/why",
|
||
"title": "Paprika - why",
|
||
"html": "\n \n <section class=\"hero subpage why-paprika-hero\">\n <div class=\"hero-kicker\">Why Paprika</div>\n <h1>Evidence built to matter.</h1>\n <p class=\"subhead\">Attorney-curated, tailored to your profile, timed with purpose, and completely documented — here's what sets Paprika apart.</p>\n <div class=\"actions\">\n <a class=\"button primary\" href=\"/start\">Start Here</a>\n <a class=\"button secondary\" href=\"/ask\">Ask a Question</a>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"why-v2\">\n <div class=\"why-v2-grid\">\n \n <article class=\"why-card featured\">\n <div>\n <div class=\"why-card-num\">01</div>\n <h3>Attorney-curated. Built to matter.</h3>\n </div>\n <div>\n <p>Some evidence looks impressive — until it has to support an O-1 profile.<br><br>A famous outlet name, a glossy article, or a judging title is not enough if the opportunity is promotional, editorially ambiguous, off-field, or poorly documented. A contributor feature in a popular publication carries less evidentiary weight than a field-specific editorial piece that clearly supports your recognition.<br><br>Most people only find out when it is too late to fix.<br><br>Paprika looks beneath the surface. Every opportunity is evaluated for credibility, independence, field fit, timing, and documentation. The result is evidence you can stand behind — not just evidence that looks like it should help.</p>\n <div class=\"why-card-line\">Not more evidence. Better evidence.</div>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"why-card\">\n <div>\n <div class=\"why-card-num\">02</div>\n <h3>Built before you need it.</h3>\n </div>\n <div>\n <p>Recognition built in a rush can feel thin, reactive, and less convincing. Paprika helps you build with a cleaner cadence — one that gives each piece time, context, and purpose.<br><br>Starting early gives you more control. Even one well-chosen article can meaningfully change what your profile looks like when it is time to file.</p>\n <div class=\"why-card-line\">Start earlier. Build stronger.</div>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"why-card\">\n <div>\n <div class=\"why-card-num\">03</div>\n <h3>A coherent profile, tailored to you.</h3>\n </div>\n <div>\n <p>A strong O-1 profile is not a collection of impressive things. It is a coherent story about who you are and what your field recognizes you for.<br><br>Paprika starts with your background, field, existing recognition, goals, and timeline — then builds an evidence path designed for your specific profile. Every piece is selected for how it fits the larger picture: what it shows, why it belongs, and how it supports the recognition story your profile needs to tell.<br><br>The result is evidence that works together — not a pile of disconnected achievements.</p>\n <div class=\"why-card-line\">The right pieces. A stronger O-1 story.</div>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"why-card\">\n <div>\n <div class=\"why-card-num\">04</div>\n <h3>A complete evidence record.</h3>\n </div>\n <div>\n <p>Paprika does not stop at the placement. We deliver a complete evidence file behind it — relevant publication details, screenshots, source links, outlet/event context, editor/organizer correspondence, organizer recommendation letters where applicable, and other supporting materials.<br><br>Everything is organized, contextualized, and prepared in a clear, complete evidence package designed to support your O-1 profile.</p>\n <div class=\"why-card-line\">No scattered files. No missing context. Evidence ready for the next step.</div>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"why-card\">\n <div>\n <div class=\"why-card-num\">05</div>\n <h3>Everything in one place.</h3>\n </div>\n <div>\n <p>Paprika helps you build the evidence side of your O-1 profile in a way that fits your specific background, field, timeline, and goals — whether you plan to work with an attorney or take your own next step.<br><br>If you decide to engage legal counsel, we can introduce you to carefully selected O-1 immigration attorneys held to the standard of BigLaw rigor and elite legal training. Not a name pulled from a directory of thousands — a deliberate introduction to counsel who meets a higher standard.</p>\n <div class=\"why-card-line\">Evidence, documentation, and the right attorney when you want one. All in one place.</div>\n </div>\n </article>\n </div>\n <div class=\"why-v2-peace\">\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">Peace of mind</div>\n <h2>You do not have to second-guess what you are building.</h2>\n <p>When every piece of evidence is attorney-curated, tailored to your profile, timed with purpose, and completely documented, the path feels clearer.</p>\n <div class=\"why-card-line\">You just build.</div>\n </div>\n </section>"
|
||
},
|
||
"resources": {
|
||
"key": "resources",
|
||
"path": "/resources",
|
||
"title": "Paprika - resources",
|
||
"html": "\n \n <section class=\"hero subpage resources-hero\">\n <div class=\"hero-kicker\">Resources</div>\n <h1>The 8 O-1A criteria, explained.</h1>\n <p class=\"subhead\">What each O-1A criterion means, what matters, and what to watch out for.</p>\n <div class=\"actions\">\n <a class=\"button primary\" href=\"/start\">Start Here</a>\n <a class=\"button secondary\" href=\"/ask\">Ask a Question</a>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"criteria-page\">\n <div class=\"criteria-intro\">\n <p>The O-1A visa is for individuals with extraordinary ability in the sciences, education, business, or athletics. Most applicants build an O-1A profile by showing evidence under at least three of the eight criteria, unless they have received a major internationally recognized award, such as a Nobel Prize. This page explains what each criterion means, in plain English.</p>\n <div class=\"criteria-note-inline\">\n <h2>A note before you read</h2>\n <p>Meeting three criteria is the threshold, not the finish line. The O-1A analysis is not just a numbers game. After the minimum evidence categories are addressed, USCIS may evaluate the totality of the record to determine whether the evidence shows sustained national or international acclaim and extraordinary ability in the field.</p>\n <p>That is why quality matters. A smaller set of credible, well-documented, field-relevant evidence can be stronger than a larger set of disconnected materials that only look impressive on the surface.</p>\n </div>\n </div>\n <div class=\"criteria-grid\">\n \n <article class=\"criterion-card\">\n <div class=\"criterion-meta\">01 — Criterion</div>\n <h2>Awards</h2>\n <p><strong>Nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in your field.</strong></p>\n <p>Awards can support an O-1A profile when they show recognized achievement in your field. What matters is not just the name of the award, but the standard behind it: who gives it, how winners are selected, how competitive the process is, whether recognized experts are involved, and whether the recognition extends beyond a narrow internal setting.</p>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Stronger examples</span><p>Industry awards from major organizations, government fellowships, and competitive national or international prizes with expert-led selection.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Watch out for</span><p>Internal company awards, participation certificates, pay-to-win honors, or awards with unclear selection standards.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Bottom line</span><p>The strongest awards show real selectivity, recognition in your field, and independent expert judgment — not just a title or certificate.</p></div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"criterion-card\">\n <div class=\"criterion-meta\">02 — Criterion</div>\n <h2>Memberships</h2>\n <p><strong>Membership in associations that require outstanding achievements, judged by recognized experts.</strong></p>\n <p>Memberships can support an O-1A profile when admission itself reflects achievement. The key issue is whether membership is genuinely selective: what the admission standard is, who evaluates candidates, whether recognized experts are involved in making the judgment, and whether your membership tier actually reflects achievement.</p>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Stronger examples</span><p>Fellow or invited tiers of professional societies, selective academies, founder or research communities with merit-based admission, and associations where admission requires demonstrated achievement formally reviewed by experts in the field.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Watch out for</span><p>Memberships open to anyone who pays dues, ordinary professional associations, paid directories, networking groups, or organizations where anyone in the field can join.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Bottom line</span><p>The strongest memberships are earned, not purchased — admission itself should say something about your work.</p></div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"criterion-card\">\n <div class=\"criterion-meta\">03 — Criterion</div>\n <h2>Published Material About You</h2>\n <p><strong>Published material about you and your work in professional publications, major trade publications, or major media.</strong></p>\n <p>Published material can support an O-1A profile when the coverage recognizes you, your work, and your role in the field. The key issue is not whether the outlet name looks impressive, but whether the piece is genuinely about you: what it says about your work, whether the publication is credible, whether the format is independent, and whether the article is clearly documented with a title, date, author, and source.</p>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Stronger examples</span><p>Independent editorial features, interviews, and field-specific articles in credible publications that discuss your work, expertise, recognition, or impact.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Watch out for</span><p>Contributor-style articles, sponsored or paid placements, self-authored content, promotional pieces, or articles that mainly cover a company without clearly recognizing your individual role — no matter how recognizable the outlet name is.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Bottom line</span><p>The strongest press is about you, written independently, in an outlet that matters to your field. A famous logo is not the same as editorial recognition.</p></div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"criterion-card\">\n <div class=\"criterion-meta\">04 — Criterion</div>\n <h2>Judging the Work of Others</h2>\n <p><strong>Serving as a judge of others' work in your field or an allied field.</strong></p>\n <p>Judging can support an O-1A profile when it shows that your expertise was trusted to evaluate work in your field. The key issue is whether the role is genuinely evaluative: why you were selected, what you actually assessed, whether the role connects to your field, and whether your participation is clearly documented.</p>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Stronger examples</span><p>Journal peer review, conference review committees, grant review panels, award committees, startup pitch or competition judging, hackathon judging, research competition judging, and other selective evaluation roles where your expertise is used to assess work in your field.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Watch out for</span><p>Ceremonial titles, vague advisory roles, informal mentorship, event attendance, student-only activities with limited field relevance, one-off or little-known hackathons with unclear judging standards, or opportunities with no clear evaluation function.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Bottom line</span><p>The strongest judging roles are selective, genuinely evaluative, field-relevant, and well documented — not just your name on an event page.</p></div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"criterion-card\">\n <div class=\"criterion-meta\">05 — Criterion</div>\n <h2>Original Contributions of Major Significance</h2>\n <p><strong>Original scientific, scholarly, or business-related contributions of major significance in your field.</strong></p>\n <p>Original contributions can support an O-1A profile when your work did more than solve an internal problem or show personal talent. The key issue is impact: what you created, why it was original, who used it or relied on it, and whether there is evidence that the contribution mattered beyond your immediate role. Originality alone is not enough — there should be evidence that the contribution was recognized, used, adopted, cited, or relied on beyond the ordinary course of your work.</p>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Stronger examples</span><p>Cited research, widely adopted products or tools, patents in commercial use, open-source projects with meaningful usage, technical methods adopted by others, industry-recognized innovations, and expert commentary explaining the significance of your work.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Watch out for</span><p>Calling something “innovative” without evidence of impact, internal projects with no outside recognition, patents that were never used, products with unclear adoption, or achievements described only by your employer without independent support.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Bottom line</span><p>The strongest contributions show originality and significance together — not just that you built something impressive, but that the field noticed, used, adopted, cited, or relied on it.</p></div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"criterion-card\">\n <div class=\"criterion-meta\">06 — Criterion</div>\n <h2>Scholarly Articles</h2>\n <p><strong>Authorship of scholarly articles in your field, in professional journals or other major media.</strong></p>\n <p>Scholarly articles can support an O-1A profile when they show that you have contributed written expertise to your field. The key issue is not just whether an article was published, but whether it is genuinely scholarly and reflects your subject-matter expertise: what you wrote about, whether the topic fits your field, whether the publication has credible editorial or peer-review standards, whether the venue has meaningful field recognition, and whether your authorship is clearly documented — you as the author, not just a cited or quoted figure.</p>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Stronger examples</span><p>Peer-reviewed journal articles, indexed publications, reviewed conference papers, scholarly book chapters with editorial oversight, and substantive professional or trade articles that demonstrate expertise in an area connected to your O-1A profile.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Watch out for</span><p>Low-quality journals, pay-to-publish outlets with weak editorial standards, preprints with no peer review or citation history, blog-style posts without editorial oversight, irrelevant topics, unclear authorship on multi-author papers, superficial commentary, or articles that do not connect to the field you are trying to establish.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Bottom line</span><p>The strongest scholarly articles show real authorship, credible publication standards, and clear field relevance — not just that your name appeared on a published piece.</p></div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"criterion-card\">\n <div class=\"criterion-meta\">07 — Criterion</div>\n <h2>Critical or Essential Role</h2>\n <p><strong>Serving in a critical or essential capacity for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation.</strong></p>\n <p>A critical or essential role can support an O-1A profile when the evidence shows two things together: your role mattered, and the organization itself had a distinguished reputation. The key issue is not just your title, but what the role actually required: what you owned, what decisions you influenced, what outcomes you helped drive, and why your work was important to the organization’s activities.</p>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Stronger examples</span><p>Founder or executive roles at credible startups, leadership of major products or initiatives, key technical or business roles tied to revenue, funding, launches, growth, research output, or strategic decisions, and roles at organizations with strong outside signals such as recognized investors, major funding, press coverage, awards, selective accelerator participation, major customers, or significant market traction.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Watch out for</span><p>Impressive titles without clear authority or impact, generic employment letters that do not explain what you actually did, ordinary job descriptions, junior or peripheral roles at famous organizations, senior roles at organizations with little outside recognition, or evidence that proves the organization is distinguished without showing why your role was critical.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Bottom line</span><p>The strongest critical-role evidence proves both halves — a distinguished organization and a role that was genuinely important to what the organization achieved.</p></div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"criterion-card\">\n <div class=\"criterion-meta\">08 — Criterion</div>\n <h2>High Salary or Remuneration</h2>\n <p><strong>High salary or other significantly high compensation compared with others in your field.</strong></p>\n <p>This is one of the most objectively documentable criteria — but only with the right comparison data. A large number on its own proves little. High compensation can support an O-1A profile when the evidence shows not just what you earned or will earn, but why it is high for your field. The key issue is comparison: your role, level, industry, geography, total compensation package, and the benchmark data showing your compensation is meaningfully above comparable professionals. Location matters — a salary that is high in one market may be ordinary in another.</p>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Stronger examples</span><p>Signed offer letters or employment agreements, recent pay records, tax documents with sensitive information redacted, bonus documentation, equity grant agreements with vesting schedules and valuation support, and third-party compensation data for comparable roles in the same field and market.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Watch out for</span><p>Salary numbers without comparison data, equity without valuation support, broad or cherry-picked benchmarks, promised future compensation without written documentation, or compensation that sounds high in general but is not clearly high for the relevant role, field, and location.</p></div>\n <div class=\"criterion-block\"><span class=\"criterion-label\">Bottom line</span><p>The strongest high-compensation evidence shows both the number and the context — what you earned or will earn, how it is documented, and why it is high compared with the right market.</p></div>\n </article>\n </div>\n <div class=\"criteria-disclaimer\">\n <p>This overview is general information about the O-1A visa category, not legal advice about any individual's eligibility. Paprika is not a law firm and does not provide legal services. For case-specific guidance, consult a licensed immigration attorney.</p>\n </div>\n </section>"
|
||
},
|
||
"faq": {
|
||
"key": "faq",
|
||
"path": "/faq",
|
||
"title": "Paprika - faq",
|
||
"html": "\n \n <section class=\"hero subpage resources-hero faq-hero\">\n <div class=\"hero-kicker\">Resources</div>\n <h1>Frequently asked questions.</h1>\n \n \n </section>\n \n <section class=\"faq-page\">\n \n <section class=\"faq-section\">\n <div class=\"faq-section-head\">\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">About Paprika</div>\n <h2>How Paprika works.</h2>\n \n </div>\n <div class=\"faq-list\">\n \n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">01</div>\n <div>\n <h3>Is Paprika a law firm?</h3>\n <p>No. Paprika is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or legal representation. Using Paprika does not create an attorney-client relationship.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">02</div>\n <div>\n <h3>What does Paprika actually do?</h3>\n <p>Paprika helps build and document the evidence side of an O-1 profile. We start with your background, field, timeline, and goals, then create an attorney-curated evidence path tailored to your profile for a stronger, more coherent record. The goal is simple: evidence built with purpose, not random visibility.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">03</div>\n <div>\n <h3>Who is Paprika for?</h3>\n <p>Founders, engineers, researchers, executives, creators, and other high-achieving professionals building the public recognition their O-1 profile needs. It's especially useful for people who have done strong work, but whose public record does not yet fully show it.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">04</div>\n <div>\n <h3>How does the Paprika process work?</h3>\n <p>You share your background, field, existing recognition, and timeline. We review your profile, recommend an evidence path that fits, and then help build it with documentation from the start.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">05</div>\n <div>\n <h3>When should I start?</h3>\n <p>As early as practical. Evidence is usually stronger when it is not rushed — coverage built over time looks like what it is: real recognition, while evidence that appears in a single burst right before filing raises questions. Starting early gives each piece more time, context, and purpose. Even one well-chosen evidence piece can meaningfully strengthen the record available when it is time to file.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">06</div>\n <div>\n <h3>Does Paprika guarantee visa approval?</h3>\n <p>No — and you should be cautious of anyone who does. USCIS makes the final decision based on the full petition and supporting evidence. Paprika helps build and organize evidence, but we do not control government decisions or provide legal representation. What we stand behind is our work: when a specific deliverable is included in a written scope, we deliver it.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">07</div>\n <div>\n <h3>Do I need an immigration attorney before using Paprika?</h3>\n <p>No — and some people never hire one. You can start building evidence before selecting an attorney, alongside an attorney you already have, or before deciding how to handle the next step.</p><p>Paprika helps build and organize the evidence record. If you have counsel, we can work alongside them. If you do not, you can still use Paprika to prepare clear, well-documented materials for whatever next step you choose. And if you want legal representation, we can introduce you to specialized O-1 immigration attorneys.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">08</div>\n <div>\n <h3>Is it legitimate to build O-1A evidence?</h3>\n <p>Yes — when the evidence is real, earned, and accurately documented. Building an O-1 profile is not about manufacturing credentials. It is about identifying legitimate opportunities that fit your background, completing the actual work, and creating a clear record of what happened. Paprika helps build that record with purpose: real recognition, real participation, and complete documentation — not fake awards, empty titles, or evidence that only looks impressive on the surface.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">09</div>\n <div>\n <h3>Is my information secure?</h3>\n <p>Yes. Paprika is designed to protect sensitive professional and personal information. Your information is transmitted securely and stored using reputable services with industry-standard protections. Access is limited to team members who need it to perform the service, and attorneys only see your materials after you authorize access.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n </div>\n </section>\n <section class=\"faq-section\">\n <div class=\"faq-section-head\">\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">O1 Visa</div>\n <h2>O-1 Basics</h2>\n \n </div>\n <div class=\"faq-list\">\n \n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">10</div>\n <div>\n <h3>What is the O-1A visa?</h3>\n <p>The O-1A visa is for individuals with extraordinary ability in the sciences, education, business, or athletics. U.S. regulations describe extraordinary ability as a level of expertise showing that a person is among the small percentage who have risen to the very top of the field. See our plain-English breakdown: The 8 O-1A Criteria, Explained.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">11</div>\n <div>\n <h3>What does “evidence-building” mean?</h3>\n <p>Evidence-building means developing and documenting credible, field-relevant recognition that can support an O-1. It is not just about having more materials – it is about building a clearer record: what the evidence is, why it fits your field, and how it connects to your profile.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">12</div>\n <div>\n <h3>Is more evidence always better?</h3>\n <p>No. More evidence is not always stronger evidence. A smaller set of credible, well-documented, field-relevant evidence can be stronger than a larger set of disconnected materials that only look impressive on the surface.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">13</div>\n <div>\n <h3>Do I need to be featured in The New York Times or another top-tier outlet?</h3>\n <p>No. A top-tier outlet can be valuable, but it’s not the only path — and chasing famous logos is often the wrong strategy. What matters is whether the coverage is credible, independent, field-relevant, meaningfully about you, and properly documented. A famous logo is not the same as editorial recognition.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">14</div>\n <div>\n <h3>Do hackathon judging roles help?</h3>\n <p>They can — but not all hackathons are equal. A hackathon judging role is stronger when the event is credible, the judging standards are clear, your role is genuinely evaluative, and the subject matter connects to your field. One-off or little-known hackathons with unclear standards adds little.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n </div>\n </section>\n <section class=\"faq-section\">\n <div class=\"faq-section-head\">\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">Timeline</div>\n <h2>How long things take.</h2>\n \n </div>\n <div class=\"faq-list\">\n \n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">15</div>\n <div>\n <h3>Does the timing of my articles matter?</h3>\n <p>Yes, more than most people realize. If all your press coverage is published just before filing, it can appear rushed and artificial. Coverage spaced out over time demonstrate a naturally established profile rather than one manufactured all at once. This is exactly why starting early matters.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">16</div>\n <div>\n <h3>How long does press take?</h3>\n <p>It varies by publication, topic, editorial process, and how quickly you provide the information needed. It typically ranges from a few days to several weeks per placement.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">17</div>\n <div>\n <h3>How long does it take to secure a judging role?</h3>\n <p>Timing depends on your field, the event calendar, organizer availability, and your profile fit. Some judging paths may open within weeks; others follow competition cycles, conference review schedules, or invitation timelines. After intake, Paprika provides a proposed path and realistic timing.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">18</div>\n <div>\n <h3>How long do scholarly articles take?</h3>\n <p>It depends on the publication path. Peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings can take months; professional or field-specific articles may move faster. Paprika helps identify publication paths that fit your field, timeline, and evidence goals.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n </div>\n </section>\n <section class=\"faq-section\">\n <div class=\"faq-section-head\">\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">Pricing Structure</div>\n <h2>Pricing, scope, and refunds</h2>\n \n </div>\n <div class=\"faq-list\">\n \n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">19</div>\n <div>\n <h3>How is pricing structured?</h3>\n <p>Pricing depends on the evidence path, number of deliverables, outlet or opportunity tier, and timeline needs. After intake, Paprika provides a written scope and quote before work begins.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n <article class=\"faq-item\">\n <div class=\"faq-num\">20</div>\n <div>\n <h3>Do you offer refunds?</h3>\n <p>Refund terms are set in your written scope and service agreement. We do not offer refunds based on visa outcomes, because Paprika does not control USCIS decisions. If we are unable to secure the agreed-upon media placements within the timeframe specified in your agreement, you are entitled to a refund.</p>\n </div>\n </article>\n </div>\n </section>\n </section>\n \n <section class=\"services-cta\">\n <div class=\"services-cta-inner\">\n <div>\n <h2>Questions answered.<br>Now let's talk about<br>your profile.</h2>\n <p>Share your background. We'll review it and recommend the evidence path that fits — no commitment required.</p>\n </div>\n <a class=\"button\" href=\"/start\">Send Us Your Profile <span class=\"button-arrow\">→</span></a>\n </div>\n </section>"
|
||
},
|
||
"thanks": {
|
||
"key": "thanks",
|
||
"path": "/thanks",
|
||
"title": "Paprika - thanks",
|
||
"html": "\n <section class=\"notice\">\n <h2>Thank you. We received your background.</h2>\n <p>The Paprika team will review your profile and follow up with next steps. If your timeline is urgent, mention that in your reply.</p>\n <div class=\"actions\"><a class=\"button secondary\" href=\"/\">Back to Homepage</a></div>\n </section>"
|
||
},
|
||
"terms": {
|
||
"key": "terms",
|
||
"path": "/terms",
|
||
"title": "Paprika - terms",
|
||
"html": "\n <section class=\"legal-doc\">\n <div class=\"legal-doc-head\">\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">Terms</div>\n <h1>Terms of Service</h1>\n <div class=\"legal-date\">Last updated: July 6, 2026</div>\n </div>\n <div class=\"legal-sections\">\n <article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>1. Agreement to These Terms</h2><p>By accessing the Paprika website or purchasing Paprika services (“the Services”), operated by MeetPaprika (“Paprika,” “we,” “us,” or “our”), you agree to these Terms of Service. If you do not agree, please do not use the Services.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>2. What Paprika Provides</h2><p>Paprika is a non-legal evidence preparation and documentation service for individuals building an O-1 profile. We help clients identify, organize, document, and compile evidence of their professional achievements. Paprika does not provide legal advice, determine immigration eligibility, prepare immigration petitions, or file immigration applications. The specific services, deliverables, timelines, and fees for each engagement are set out in a written scope agreed before work begins (“Written Scope”).</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>3. Not a Law Firm — No Legal Advice</h2><p>Paprika is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or legal representation. Content on this website, communications with our team, and materials we prepare are general information and evidence-support services — not legal advice about any individual's eligibility, petition strategy, or case. References to \"attorney-curated\" mean that evidence-building services are reviewed for general immigration-evidence relevance by licensed legal professionals or legally trained reviewers; they do not mean legal advice is being provided.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>4. No Attorney-Client Relationship</h2><p>Use of the Services — including submitting a form, asking a question, booking a call, or purchasing an engagement — does not create an attorney-client relationship with Paprika or any individual associated with Paprika. If you engage an immigration attorney, including one we refer you to, that relationship is formed separately under the attorney's own engagement terms.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>5. No Guarantee of Immigration Outcomes</h2><p>Immigration decisions are made by USCIS and other government agencies based on the full petition and record. Paprika does not guarantee visa approval, the treatment of any evidence by any government agency, or any legal outcome. Where a specific deliverable is included in a Written Scope, we stand behind that deliverable under the terms of the applicable agreement — but no deliverable is a promise of an immigration result.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>6. Attorney Referrals</h2><p>Paprika may refer clients to independent immigration attorneys, including affiliated legal services. Any such relationship is disclosed at the time of referral. Referred attorneys operate under their own engagement agreements, fees, conflict checks, and professional obligations, independent of Paprika.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>7. Fees, Payment, and Refunds</h2><p>Fees are set out in your Written Scope and quoted before work begins. Unless your Written Scope states otherwise: payment terms, milestones, and any deposit requirements are as stated in the Written Scope; refund terms are governed by the Written Scope and applicable service agreement. We do not offer refunds based on visa or immigration outcomes. If we are unable to deliver an agreed placement or deliverable within the timeframe specified in your agreement, your remedy — including any refund — is as set out in that agreement.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>8. Client Responsibilities and Accuracy of Information</h2><p>You agree to provide accurate, truthful, and complete information about your background, credentials, and work. Paprika's services depend on the integrity of the information you provide. You are responsible for reviewing materials we prepare and for the accuracy of any information you or your representatives submit to any publication, organization, or government agency.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>9. Evidence Integrity</h2><p>Paprika builds and documents real recognition: genuine editorial coverage, genuine evaluative roles, and genuine authorship. We do not fabricate credentials, create fictitious awards or titles, or misrepresent the nature of any placement or role. We may decline or discontinue any engagement that, in our judgment, would require misrepresenting facts.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>10. Third-Party Decisions</h2><p>Publications, competitions, journals, and other organizations make their own editorial, selection, and acceptance decisions. Paprika coordinates and supports placements but does not control third-party editorial judgment, publication timing, event scheduling, or organizational decisions. Deliverable commitments are as defined in your Written Scope.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>11. Your Materials</h2><p>You retain ownership of the documents and information you provide to us. You grant Paprika a limited license to use them solely to perform the Services. We do not sell your information or use it for purposes unrelated to your engagement. Our handling of personal information is described in our Privacy Policy.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>12. Work Product</h2><p>Upon full payment, deliverables prepared specifically for you under a Written Scope are yours to use. Paprika retains ownership of its methods, templates, internal processes, and know-how.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>13. Prohibited Uses</h2><p>You may not use the Services to pursue fraudulent immigration filings or misrepresent your background or credentials; interfere with or attempt to gain unauthorized access to our systems or other clients' information; or resell or redistribute our services or materials without written permission.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>14. Disclaimer of Warranties</h2><p>Except as expressly stated in a Written Scope, the Services are provided \"as is\" and \"as available,\" without warranties of any kind, express or implied, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>15. Limitation of Liability</h2><p>To the maximum extent permitted by law, Paprika is not liable for indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages, including loss of profits, opportunities, or immigration outcomes, arising from the Services. Our total liability for any claim arising from an engagement shall not exceed the amount you paid Paprika under the applicable Written Scope.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>16. Changes to These Terms</h2><p>We may update these Terms from time to time. Material changes will be posted on this page with an updated date. Continued use of the Services after changes take effect constitutes acceptance.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>18. Governing Law</h2><p>These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to conflict of law provisions.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>19. Contact</h2><p>Questions about these Terms: support@meetpaprika.com.</p></article>\n </div>\n </section>"
|
||
},
|
||
"privacy": {
|
||
"key": "privacy",
|
||
"path": "/privacy",
|
||
"title": "Paprika - privacy",
|
||
"html": "\n <section class=\"legal-doc\">\n <div class=\"legal-doc-head\">\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">Privacy</div>\n <h1>Privacy Policy</h1>\n <div class=\"legal-date\">Last updated: July 6, 2026</div>\n </div>\n <div class=\"legal-sections\">\n <article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>1. Introduction</h2><p>Paprika (\"we,\" \"us,\" or \"our\") respects your privacy. This Privacy Policy explains how we collect, use, store, and protect your information when you visit our website or use our services.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>2. Information We Collect</h2><p>Information you provide. When you submit our intake form, ask a question, or engage our services, we may collect your name, email address, LinkedIn URL, website, current role and company, field or industry, location, visa status or goals, timeline, budget range, descriptions of your background and existing recognition, and any documents you choose to share, such as a CV or resume.</p><p>Information collected during an engagement. If you become a client, we collect the information needed to deliver your services — including biographical and professional details used for press placements, judging applications, and publication submissions, plus related correspondence.</p><p>Usage data. We collect standard website analytics, such as page views and general interaction patterns. This data is used in aggregate and is not tied to the content of your documents.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>3. How We Use Your Information</h2><p>We use your information to review your background and recommend an evidence path; deliver the services in your written scope; prepare documentation and evidence packages; respond to your questions and communicate about your engagement; process payments; and improve our website and services using aggregate data.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>4. How We Share Your Information</h2><p>We do not sell your personal information. We share information only as follows:</p><p>To deliver your services. Delivering Paprika's services inherently involves sharing relevant information with third parties on your behalf — for example, providing your professional background to publications or editors in connection with opportunities you have engaged us to pursue. We share what is needed for the specific opportunity, consistent with your engagement.</p><p>With attorneys, only when you authorize it. We do not share your profile or materials with any attorney — including attorneys we refer you to — unless you authorize that sharing.</p><p>With service providers. We use reputable third-party tools to operate our business, such as form, scheduling, file storage, customer management, email, and analytics providers. These providers process information solely to support our services and are not permitted to use it for their own purposes.</p><p>As required by law. We may disclose information if required by law, legal process, or to protect the rights, safety, or property of Paprika or others.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>5. Data Storage and Security</h2><p>Your information is transmitted securely and stored using reputable services with industry-standard protections. Access is limited to team members who need it to perform the services. We take reasonable administrative and technical measures to protect your information, though no method of transmission or storage is completely secure.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>6. Data Retention</h2><p>We retain your information for as long as needed to deliver your services, maintain our business records, and comply with legal obligations. If you are not a client, intake and inquiry information is retained only as long as reasonably needed to respond and follow up.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>7. Your Rights</h2><p>You may request access to the personal information we hold about you, correction of inaccurate information, or deletion of your information, subject to any legally required retention (such as payment and tax records). To make a request, contact us at support@meetpaprika.com. Depending on where you live, you may have additional rights under applicable privacy laws, including California law.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>8. Cookies</h2><p>We use essential cookies for website functionality and analytics tools to understand general usage. We do not use advertising cookies or sell data collected through cookies.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>9. Children's Privacy</h2><p>Our website and services are not intended for anyone under 18. We do not knowingly collect information from children.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>10. International Users</h2><p>Our services are operated from the United States. If you access them from elsewhere, your information may be transferred to and processed in the United States.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>11. Changes to This Policy</h2><p>We may update this Privacy Policy from time to time. Material changes will be posted on this page with an updated date.</p></article><article class=\"legal-section\"><h2>12. Contact</h2><p>Questions about this Policy or your information: support@meetpaprika.com.</p></article>\n </div>\n </section>"
|
||
},
|
||
"disclaimer": {
|
||
"key": "disclaimer",
|
||
"path": "/disclaimer",
|
||
"title": "Paprika - disclaimer",
|
||
"html": "\n <section class=\"legal-doc\">\n <div class=\"legal-doc-head\">\n <div class=\"process-kicker\">Legal Notice</div>\n <h1>Disclaimer</h1>\n <div class=\"legal-date\">Last updated: July 6, 2026</div>\n </div>\n <div class=\"legal-sections\">\n \n <article class=\"legal-section\">\n <h2>Not a Law Firm</h2>\n <p>Paprika is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice, legal representation, immigration legal services, or petition filing services. Paprika is an evidence preparation and documentation service for individuals building an O-1 profile. We help clients identify, organize, document, and compile evidence related to their professional achievements. The specific services, deliverables, timelines, and fees for each engagement are set out in a written scope agreed before work begins (“Written Scope”).</p><p>Nothing on this website, in our communications, or in materials prepared by Paprika should be understood as legal advice about any individual’s immigration eligibility, petition strategy, filing options, petitioner or agent structure, or likely outcome.</p>\n </article>\n <article class=\"legal-section\">\n <h2>What \"Attorney-Curated\" Means</h2>\n <p>References to \"attorney-curated\" mean that Paprika's evidence-building services is shaped by an attorney-informed standard for evidence quality, including credibility, field fit, timing, independence, coherence, and documentation.</p><p>This reflects a service-quality standard for how opportunities are evaluated, selected, organized, and documented. It is general in nature and is not a legal review of any individual’s immigration eligibility, petition strategy, or case merits.</p><p>\"Attorney-curated\" does not mean any of the following:</p><ul><li>that Paprika is providing legal advice or legal services;</li><li>that Paprika is making an immigration eligibility determination about you;</li><li>that Paprika is preparing, reviewing, or filing an immigration petition;</li><li>that any attorney is acting as your attorney or representing your interests;</li><li>that a legal opinion has been given about whether any evidence satisfies any O-1 criterion; or</li><li>that any evidence will be accepted, credited, or weighed in any particular way by USCIS or any other government agency.</li></ul><p>Paprika may consider whether an evidence opportunity appears generally relevant to an O-1 profile. That consideration is a service-quality judgment, not a legal conclusion. Any determination about whether evidence satisfies a legal criterion, how evidence should be presented or used in a petition, or what a petition should contain must be made by independent, licensed immigration counsel engaged by you.</p>\n </article>\n <article class=\"legal-section\">\n <h2>No Attorney-Client Relationship</h2>\n <p>Use of Paprika's does not create an attorney-client relationship. This includes visiting the website, submitting a form, asking a question, booking a call, uploading materials, receiving communications from our team, purchasing services, or receiving an evidence package. No attorney-client relationship is formed with Paprika or with any person associated with Paprika.</p>\n </article>\n <article class=\"legal-section\">\n <h2>Independent Counsel</h2>\n <p>O-1 eligibility, petition strategy, petitioner and agent structures, filing decisions, responses to government requests, and immigration case strategy are legal matters. You should consult independent, licensed immigration counsel for advice about your specific situation. If you engage an attorney, that relationship is formed separately under the attorney's own engagement terms.</p>\n </article>\n <article class=\"legal-section\">\n <h2>Attorney Referral Disclosure</h2>\n <p>Paprika may refer clients to independent immigration attorneys, including affiliated legal services. Where such a relationship exists, it is disclosed at the time of referral. Referred attorneys operate under their own engagement agreements, fees, and professional obligations, independent of Paprika. A referral is not a guarantee of eligibility, approval, or legal outcome.</p>\n </article>\n <article class=\"legal-section\">\n <h2>No Outcome Guarantee</h2>\n <p>Immigration decisions are made by USCIS and other government agencies based on the full petition, record, applicable law, and agency discretion. Paprika does not guarantee visa approval, petition approval, government treatment of any evidence, avoidance of a request for evidence or denial, or any legal outcome. Where a specific deliverable is included in a Written Scope, Paprika stands behind that deliverable under the terms of the applicable agreement — but no deliverable is a promise of an immigration result.</p>\n </article>\n <article class=\"legal-section\">\n <h2>User Responsibility</h2>\n <p>You are responsible for providing accurate, complete, and truthful information to Paprika.</p><p>Paprika may rely on the information, documents, and representations you provide, and does not independently verify every fact, credential, employment history, award, publication, or achievement unless verification is expressly included in the Written Scope.</p><p>You should not submit false, misleading, fabricated, or exaggerated information. Paprika may decline, pause, or terminate services if we believe information provided is inaccurate, incomplete, misleading, or inconsistent with the purpose of building a credible evidence record.</p>\n </article>\n <article class=\"legal-section\">\n <h2>General Information Only</h2>\n <p>Content on this website is provided for general informational purposes only. It may describe O-1 evidence categories, common documentation considerations, or general evidence-building concepts, but it is not legal advice and should not be relied on as a substitute for advice from a licensed immigration attorney.</p>\n </article>\n <article class=\"legal-section\">\n <h2>Questions</h2>\n <p>If anything on this page is unclear, contact us at support@meetpaprika.com.</p>\n </article>\n </div>\n </section>"
|
||
}
|
||
} as const satisfies Record<LegacyPageKey, LegacyPage>;
|